@Karpel
There’s an assumption in the progressive community, which LGBT activists are a part of, that fauxsexuals, like lesbians and so on, are born, not made, or socially and/or self-constructed, but in actuality, it’s likely a combination of the two, which’s why I don’t think children should be exposed to this, because it could condition their still forming brain/minds into developing so called gender ‘dysphoria’, which’s a mental illness, when they otherwise wouldn’t’ve.
People with gender dysphoria often develop depression, anxiety disorders and commit suicide as a result of it.
People with gender dysphoria may feel compelled to undergo expensive and irreversible surgical procedures, sterilizing, mutilating, disfiguring and disabling them for life, take drugs and steroids with numerous side, and negative effects.
This is not something you mess a child’s mind around with, in fact, if anything, it should be considered a form of child abuse, to implant these ideas into their minds.
And we shouldn’t take claims children make about themselves regarding sex, gender and so on seriously, their brains are still forming, and so is their notion of sex and gender.
Children are highly suggestible, if you suggest they are or may be something, they may unthinkingly adopt that something, until it’s deeply ingrained, they have very limited capacity for self-assessment.
And once they go through puberty, they may feel completely different about themselves, there’s no way a child’s gender dysphoria could be set in stone, so the idea of giving kids traumatic, experimental, irreversible drugs and surgery seems ludicrous to me.
I couldn’t take a fauxsexual as the sex they believe they are, as they’re fundamentally the sex they believe they’re not, for the reasons given in this thread.
However, I could take, some of them as neuropsychological androgynes, depending largely on my own independent evaluation of their psychology.
While there is evidence to suggest their population group as a whole isn’t entirely fabricating this, how do you know every individual who claims to be a fauxsexual isn’t?
People make things up, they’re mistaken about themselves, they lie about themselves.
Why would this population group be any different?
The research, as demonstrated earlier, suggests they’re neuropsychologically androgynous, not fully males or females living inside the opposite body.
Many also end up committing suicide or trying to ‘change back’ into the sex they were.
Why is embracing their delusion the only solution?
It’s not good to believe you’re something you’re not.
If you’re a man, you will never think, feel or look exactly like a woman does, and vice versa.
Being delusional impairs ones navigation through the world.
Why not instead try getting them to see that while some of them may be neuropsychological androgynes, they’re not and can never be the other sex, not physically, not even neuropsychologically.
Why not try getting them to embrace their androgyny, instead of futilely setting them on a life long quest to become something they’re not, and will never be?
I support peoples right to think and do with their lives as they please.
Fauxsexuals represent a tiny fraction of the population, I think less than 1%, but the way the media talks about them, you’d think it would be closer to 10%.