What is Intuition? As a introduction to philosophizing.

The group thinks it is an infruitful means.

A

My mentuon of aristocracy had nothing to do with sociology or antropology.

B

Obviously understanding as you exposited does not do the same as intuition. To begin with, one needs a good reason to understand. The given seens. Because smartphone is a given seen being obsezzerved.

But if I see it, with the split? That can only ever be my problem. Words aren’t concerned with this. Just ask any acid head.

Indeed common sense is intuitive.

What is meaning here? Pointing to something and understanding what it is? E.g., a keyboard made of plastic? As opposed to: “a way of entering text into a computer” or some such definition?

How exactly is Plato more intuitional? And what does intuitional math mean? The group still has not answered what it long since raised.

The group must have more to go on.

Of course, under this determination, the paradox that one is defining or bounding intuition is in our midst, or does the group dyniey that? Determining can mean, that which is said on a metaphor with bounding a field with a river, stones, or through fences marked out after topographical marking, say with exacting scopes.

Is this your profound intuition speaking?

Perhaps that is because a woman realizes that intuition is not set in stone, it is not infallible, as our senses and our instincts are also not infallible.

Here are definitions of intuition.

Does intuition actually bring with it understanding or just a sense of something? Understanding to me means that we are clear about something, know it.
I am an agnostic but my intuition at times tells me that Something may be possible. Would you call this understanding? I would not. You can only go so far with intuition I think.

Our intuitions can also be based on our built-in beliefs and fears and so we are not necessarily receiving clear and right signals from below or above, as the case may be.

psychologytoday.com/us/blog … -we-use-it

The above definition to me almost sounds like intuition is a form of faith, where someone assumes to know something because they get that sense of it.

The group finds nothing obvious in this, rather, it is a quite vague cluster of notions. Not sure what the group wants understanding to mean that it “needs a good reason”. In ordinary usage understanding, knowing, and seeing, amount to the same thing. I understand this is a keyboard. I know a keyboard is here. I see something, it is a keyboard. Common sense. Common sense is split between spontaneous understanding, and learned phronesis. In other words, through experience and reflection, common sense is altered. If someone learns that smoking causes lung cancer, their spontaneous understanding of what a cigarette is changes.

The group finds this part of the group’s provocation profoundly boring and idiotically polemical. Therefore unworthy of answer or even decomposition. However, the group registers receipt of it.

in·tu·i·tion
ˌint(y)o͞oˈiSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning.
“we shall allow our intuition to guide us”
synonyms: instinct, intuitiveness; More
a thing that one knows or considers likely from instinctive feeling rather than conscious reasoning.
plural noun: intuitions

The group says, when one sees a house, is one unclear about what is there? Where is the unclarity supposed to be in seeing things such that it would lack understanding?

The group calls this apprehensiveness, or a forsight concerned with what is to come. Apprehensiveness is thereby distinguished from apprehension, which is understanding or knowing (simple seeing; a house is here, how do you know?, I see it).

The group could consider this a part of apprehensiveness, as so-called biased apprehension. However, this assumes a common sense knowing which is the measure of the bias as the mistake.

The group says, common sense is also a form of faith. The ground stands still, such is the claim of common sense.

One of my most tested claims to the possession of intuitive power lies in the FACT that during my college hiatus, I was employed as a professional psychic, paying good money.

Other then that my readings have mysteriously led me to esoteric Sources, among them Madame Blavasky. I have proceeded on this journey for at least 20 years, and very odd things have happened to me.

One of the most notable ones,( and if anyone read me in the past), came as attesting - to my mentioning oddity regularly, that is my audio dream with M.Polanyi.I have never, ever heard or seen this philosopher in my life, even though he was Humgarian , as I am.

I know for Some, this claim is suspect, butI am genuinely convinced that something significant is going on here.

Coincidentally, “Guide” is only one character different from my favourite Street Fighter 2 character. Can you guess who he is?

Guide,

The Group says…

Are you a part of the Borg or are you one personality belonging to multiple ones?

What is the Group? Are you part of a collective? Do you have the freedom to think for yourself and to question the Group or is it always “The Group says”?

The group is confused at the group’s sollipsism.

Are you using the term in this instance to denote ego to the point where only one’s own viewpoint or belief is the one and only to exist and to be seen? Or something else?

How does a brilliant and learned human being such as are some in here, I have to admit, go about removing his biases and God-like state of omniscience in order to discuss and arrive at some future unforeseen truth?

The group is considering not accepting girls anymore.

The group is also willing to concede that all philosophy might be the blues.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHwsYL4F4tw[/youtube]

The group says, what does significant mean? Is eating when hungry significant? Elidade, a near-dweller, of that region of the group’s origin, was given to such significances which he attests in his diaries. Where is Plato given to such significances? And the group claims Aristotle was not?

The group says, one might distinguish ipsissimosity from solipsism (in order to better see what solipsism says). Characteristic being, what is most like oneself, from the clock face turing that doesn’t change the clock hands, solipsism (cf. Wittgenstein).

Also, one might say ego names the inner actor in the mind or unconscious in contradistinction to the body in nature, nous in psuke not soma in phusis. Letting the precisions in what is written lead to the authority of the subject matter, seen in the paths, points away from ego and personal peculiarity.

Pedro I Rengel

Why is that? The girls are not living up to the group’s expectations of what was foreseen?

All? Nothing wrong with the blues. It help us to know where we are living. It is also a catharsis.
That guitar sent shivers through me.

Try this. It will take away the blues of Philosophy. Exquisite.

youtube.com/watch?v=h70ElpTQejc

Maybe this quote can also be said of the true philosopher, substituting words.
“We love surfers for the same reasons we have always admired doctors and pilots and firemen and shamans, for the same reasons we admire excellent soldiers: because despite themselves they have bowed to a force much greater than themselves, which in this case is the wave, and submitted to the gnarly rigors of its discipline. They have allowed themselves to be shaped and polished by the sea. They have given themselves up to this greater force, day after day, year after year. Crushed and punished, battered into something tempered and resilient, and sharpened to an edge by constant refinement. They are warriors in the best sense: by bending to the often brutal demands of surfing they have transformed themselves into beings who can respond to great violence with grace and humility. And beauty.”
― Peter Heller, Kook: What Surfing Taught Me About Love, Life, and Catching the Perfect Wave

I actually saw a movie at Imax the other day, Oceans 3d, where they show a wave from below. I almost cried, or did if tou count tears as crying!

But no, the group was considering this because the group notices that girls don’t take this seriously at all. It seems to the group.

“Man is the dream of the dolphin”

Always liked that phrase more than I think I should, seeing as it is out of a Enigma song.

But the first girl I truly loved was always playing it. “Return to innocence” which she never did manage.

The dialogs esp. meno has him learning without actually having anything but an embedded form to acquire it.

The dialogs esp. meno has him learning without actually having anything but an embedded form to acquire it.

A member of the group says, perhaps to entangle and overreach in the manner of a beguiling is what philosophy most demands of its guests, even those who go astray in cheep quips.

In assimilating, one is not merely private, an unknown artist, but one’s path into what is living in history comes to be for the group. Such speaks a member of the group, in the relation of its relativity, answering the group.