Well, at least your not national socialist, that has a ten year max duration and leads to the destruction of many of your own race.
The Kalergi Plan, we need to take out the white Europeans because they’re the only opposition to take us on in competition or opposing us. Our program against whiteness is progressing very well since the 1960’s.
All non Jews make up for a good servile population and we’re not really worried about them.
And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?
What about them?
It is great that we destroyed national socialism in Europe during World War II, it was the only political threat against us as it collectivized the Europeans in a form of organization that threatened our power or influence everywhere.
Being that we control capitalism and marxism we’ve essentially neutered or neutralized European whites where if they keep following both politics they’ll be within our realm of control.
And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?
[/quote]
What about them?
[/quote]
Well, you gotta figure out in your real and then fake Jewish separatisms how to deal with all the boundary cases, grey areas and close relations between races. IOW your own Nuremberg Laws.
Now you’re not making any sense at all.
Wendy has claimed you are a separatist, there are gray areas, hence the Nuremberg laws.
Nuremberg was pretty black and white. I’m unable to follow your rhetoric here.
This is a paradigm of how grey areas can give rise uncertainty, defeating deontological focus, used referentially as if it made some kind of objective sense possible.
A reductive gesture to a black and white argument failing a compromising situation, its a dilusive attempt to bring back to solvency that which can not again appear in concentrated forms.
Literally, Nuremberg could never due justice on what went on in those concentrated concentration camps.
They were not existential contraptions they were not merely metaphors of illness, they were epochs that prevented clarity in movement from sterile nihilism forwards or backwards
They literally and figuratively landed into a definitive black hole , from which escape was not possible or even conceivable.
Both: anti-semite and jew were caught in an inescapable paradoxical situation.
Ref: Sartre, ‘Reflexion sur question juive’.(in broad context) ed.1946 Edition Morihien
I am so glad the Soviets discovered those concentration camps before anybody else including the Americans. Thankfully the Bolsheviks were on our side…
Well, exactly. It was to get rid of gray areas.
The N laws laid out who was considered Jewish - amongst other things it did. Wendy says you are she are racial separatists. What will your parallel to the Nuremberg laws be. IOW how will you separate? What percentages of genes? What about adopted kids of other races? etc.
I fail to see the importance of the comparison.
Again, you are avoiding my point. What interest me about you is the extent to which you have thought through my contention that, with respect to issues like Putin’s hold on Trump [and support for Trump’s policies], your own particular “I” [here and now] is rooted in the manner in which I have come to construe the parameters of human identity [re dasein…an existential contraption] out in the is/ought world. Or, instead, is it anchored more to a philosophical/moral/political assessment that you are able to demonstrate is applicable to all men and women who wish to be thought of as rational human beings.
Are you willing to concede that perhaps your own values here are just one more example of run-of-the-mill political prejudices rooted largely in the life that you lived? Or are you convinced instead that a reasonable man must accept that those who think like “one of us” are either much closer to the objective truth or do in fact already embody it.
Besides, over and again I make it quite clear that my own understanding of nihilism is no less an existential contraption subject to change given new experiences, new relationships and new sources of information.
Just like you and your own value judgments.
Choose a context. Choose conflicting assessments of right and wrong behavior.
Then note for us the manner in which a true nihilist would react to that discussion.
More Kid stuff?
I asked Wendy a few questions that might enable us to understand better how and why she came to think and to feel as she does about Trump and Russia.
Then you react to this as you did.
It’s so ludicrous [from my point of view] I can’t help but wonder if the irony on display isn’t perhaps itself just another level of play acting.
Help me to get to the bottom of what actually motivates you to post as you do on threads like this.
^^^^Biggie,
You’re a fake pretentious nihilist (not a real one) that leans politically left and neo liberal in self described values, got it. 
I bet you’re a voter also.
Note to others:
Does he or does he not completely avoid the discussion that I wish to have with him?
This one: An exploration into the existential parameters of his own particular set of political prejudices.
As this relates to his reaction to Trump’s policies relating to, among other things, Russia and race.
Hell, he won’t even bring his contentions regarding “fake pretentious nihilists” down to earth.
And it really makes no difference in what direction “I” lean politically. Why? Because [from my perspective] that is no less itself an existential contraption rooted in dasein.
Though I suspect that what might trouble him the most here is that I will convince him this is applicable to his own political agenda as well.
Then what? How self-righteous can he be about the scumbag liberals if he comes to recognize that had his own life been different he might well be one of them today? Or that the liberals have just as many reasonable assumptions to make regarding their own political prejudices as the conservatives have about theirs.
All moral and political and philosophical objectivists start with one or another set of “givens” regarding the “human condition”.
Go ahead, let him pick an issue so that we might actually explore this more substantively “out in the world” – a world that, historically, culturally and experientially, most of us here are familiar with.
I’ve got to laugh , of course to my distractive self immolation, (purposely I may add) that it is the political middle that I and everyone nowadays is interested interested in.
For some it gives some breathing space, even of, it is the last underlying motive for human existence that’s left.
Other then that, watch the signs along the way, they do tell and show, if constructions do not devolve a grounded nihilism into something less worthy: human existence now and way back in the jungle. It is from the jungle that the lesser of evils-the abyss, which originally the caveman tried to make into his dwelling space.
You gotta get a handle on other people having their own goals in discussions. There is every chance he focuses on what he wants to just as you focus on what you want to.
I don’t think you understand how it comes off like you think other people either are here to serve your purposes or are afraid of doing what is right: iow what you want them to do.
Note: ‘comes off’. It is how you function in a discussion.
Even in a world sans God sans objective values other people may very well have internal lives and goals of their own.
Sigh. Wendy said you and she are racial separatists. It ain’t easy to separate races, give that they are often mixed in a variety of ways in one and hte same person or in families. There are percentages involved. The Nazis being the little drones they were came up with those laws, precisely to make separation and separate treatment easy to apply: you had this much jewish blood, you were Jewish, etc. I am pretty sure they broke up marriages where one was Jewish. I don’t know what they did with adopted Jews or Aryan children adopted by Jews. I am sure they did not care about long term professoinal and personal relatoinships. Those were some of their criteria when enacting racial separation.
So, if she is right and you are a race separatist, what will your Nuremberg laws look like?