Linear thinking : the primal decompressing into. an illusive neo-kantism from the failure of pragmatism in a world of useless facts, presents a subjugation of the will. Into the sphere of contrived fantasy.
The cold war, emerging with China, on basis of the charge of the theft of intellectual property has acquired a very credible battle cry into the mantra of making America Great Again, but what is this effort but stealing into the heart of man the desperate effort to quick return of the neo-Kantian short cut from the failures of a regional pragmatism? The snake charmer who likes to identify those appealing notions that deny the powers of the social will in deference over the fate of that of the individual?
Empires are not meant to last for a thousand years, and what determines China as unable to take the imperial role? Sheer numbers defeat any notion that those with the largest market place have the greatest potsntial.
Open societies are vulnerable to theft, and only a unified world can afford it whatever think tank can arrive to the conclusion that jealously guarded tech can be held at bay from outside sources of acquisition are fooling themselves.
This is a battle cry into the naive populations of those, who would like to think that all is fair as long as the war is predicated on the presumptive superiority of man over man on basis of shared vested power among individual members of empire.
But here the myth dilutes into the microcosmic fallacy of pointillistic abstraction, whete the laws of the power on the effects of the will , separate the haves from the not haves
Into a society where material ownership will exhibit more authoritarian. then democratically vested beneficiaries to such distribution.
The cold war will eventually grow warm then hot, and brother will kill brother on basis of clever sophistry.
Then what of this fear benefit any and every man that China will surpass the U.S. imperial role? It is almost an enigma that only old world rhetoric can reignite.
New: Julian Assange is the topic of discussion between Britain and. Equadorian President Lenin about the particulars of the release of Assange from its consulate, whereupon Britain’s secret service and, transfer to US custody, where he may be facing years of jail time.
The events are surging toward an increasing need toward clarification in an atmosphere of a philosophical inquiry toward increasing transparency as a form of public disclosure.
That process or procedure is failing fast as can be exhibited by the apoearent tumult created by the manufacture of increasing anger, which, created by the surge of the return to archytipical - categorically illusive sandwich, of an embattled-sandwhich, whete the ‘Art of The Deal’ is beginning to give the appearance of an ‘existential contraption’.
This having actually failed as of historical record, foreclosed on a return, bypassing the structural return, proving that the whole Putin invitation is nothing but a gesture, to shadow the underlying and almost ominous intent of that invitation being nothing but an artsy, but admirable attempt (at a time coinciding with the Congressional election, -to vest the antithesis to the liberal thesis of political infliltration by Russia, as nothing but a ruse.
This escalation of repressive dialectical returns, the parts of which literally were born immediately after the fall of the Soviet Union, the absence of a viable equivalent in the West, brought about the lack of a like united policy in an increasing vacuum in the West, as dialectically opposing the newly created patterns of existential contraption.
However, the executive branch, increasingly coming under scrutiny, squeezed potentially by a changing vestments of political power between the representative and the judiciary, seeks to create a dramatically opposite to the a priori-diminished actual image of execution to the increasingly paranoid-threatened need to prove its worth- by constant and repeated denials. at the expense of compromising reality.
The politically diminished worth of the presidency, squeezed as it is- will compensate with the only arsenal at its disposal, to all eyes , the anger becoming visibly more so, surging the internal decompression of its real legAl-political anger at the very system which mistakenly allowed mistakes to bind its system of directing political justice.and will.
As a consequence danger is arising that such ignominious loophole may turn the anger, into a real exhibition of madness.This is a sorry possibility, with things becoming potentially unhinged.
Both participants could at that point but externalize in a cover-up of a grand scale to imperialuze this huge fault, into an obvious need to underexposed the emergence of a tired, worn out system of a so called system of Democratic govednan e which outlived its usefullness as a pragmatic solution.
The anger comes from both right and left in this regard, at not realizing that the old categorical confrontations of the Neo Kantian way out, are no longer present a picture of a successful compromise.
The internalization of that hidden possibility shows a weakened , compromised executive who can only function at that point in drastic way for IT,s survival, in absolute terms of artful dealing, literally selling IT’s product an embodied and sold with its own means of production as an absolutely must sell. The appearance of that necessity will come down as a grotedqur6 sale, almost taking on the appearance of a godfather, proclaiming that its an offer buyer beware , can not refuse.
To be edited