Trump enters the stage

Juliani says today that Kim Jung Jon went on his knees and begged to have the summit in Singapore after Trump cancelled. Is Juliani on the money?

What’s at stake?

Next week in Singapore, no less then the shift in the geo political shift in the fulcrum of power, with Asia on the line. Its THE most important event since all the Asian wars put together, the culmination of the power struggle between the orient and the incident… The players fade under this dynamic, and the results will project various notices which are directly subsumed.

Added to this is the very thin layer of top level adherence of underlying layers, whose human worth decreases dramatically. With absolutely no core, from and with which value can be referred to and from, Asia needs no model by which it can navigate.

It has everything to gain and nothing to loose, for various reasons, while the U S will bleed , as usual to protect what’s remains of its overbloated expectations.

The meeting will be a metaphors of the cosmetic give and take of US internal appeasement , using maximum propaganda and blackmail payout to sustain some kind of credibility, while the Orient, fueled by the sleeping dragon’s incessant hunger for power and conquest, as usual take an impressive attitude, while harboring a very active dynamic of bleeding a delusional West, obsessed with the idea of sustaining a status quo as the guardian of Western Civilization.

The idea is, that the status quo can be bracketed, until the figuration of a global order can be assembled and favorably tilting toward the US’s favor.

Will it work? Lets see if the loaded rhetoric will be clear or merely am obscure version of a constructed transparency.

Scene : Trump enters in wearing top hat, baton and followed by thirties’chorus girls descending from stairs reminiscent of Mozart’s Queen of the Night character.

He has trumpeter backing up his constant droning which consists of repetitious recititions resembling Joel Grey

Ladies and gentlemen welcome to the show: the girls are beautiful, hmmm he looks around and all his exes and others in his past parade around in flimsy uniforms.

Welcome to my pleasure palace. : Jennifer flowers , arm in a with Stormy Danials enter with a downturned faces, “Seriously” as they continue to mumble something inaudible , a horde of ambulance chasers try to outrun them, not realizing that Jennifer is a really chained to a rock.

A Huge clock is melting in the rain ,and Kim enters stage right, in a black leather outfit trying to sing :

Stand up all victims of oppression for the tyrants fear your might!
Don’t cling so hard to your possessions for you have nothing if you have no rights

Let racist ignorance

be ended for respect makes empires fall

Freedom is merely extended when enjoyed by one and all!

Chorus:( the girls all scantily dropping most coverings and allusove smiles and winks)

: so come brothers and sisters for the struggle carries on

The Internationale carries on
The international unifies the world on song
So comrades come rally
For this is the time and place

The international ideal unites the human race.

A tremendous thunder of ovation follows, and Trump doing his very best to put on a smile . carries the flag of the One World Order unfurling with giant wind fans having the disastrous effect of blowing off his orange wig.

Emergency personnel carry both Trump and Kim off stage amid a an inescapable silence, after which a barrage of insults
is followed by the appearance of knives and shots ring out, as the fallen diplomats stampede to the nearest exit.

Ambulances and police sirens cut the Singapore night, and a nuke falls unto the island.

The news is grave: but guess what folks, not to worry, it was a stand in for both Trump and Kim, and the nuke was created by Disney labs, leaving casualties numbered only in the low thousands, for Disney tech is new to the nuke business as Allen Musk has not entirely been able to create a super light mini weapon. In addition , he has not been able to acquire but an inferior grade of plutonium , probably of Iranian or North Korean grade.

Great story, great visuals : the folks at home will eat it up.

Trump of course wants all credits.

But seriously, everything is up in the air. Trump is right, Europe has always had the economic myopia of supposing that Uncle Sam was a super economic power house, without a precedent , possessing power and wealth of inexhaustible sources. It has become metaphoric to suppose that if there were any economic hardships , the Uncle can take care of it.

The mystification resulted in an endless devolution. Into the realm of contradiction. , where ‘no’ was never seen as a viable option. - to understand Uncle , refusing help to a friend, was unimaginable.

The myth was perpetuated by uncle’s knack for beyond judging the worthiness of helpful allies, a fact bore out of acceptance of the Casa Nostra-Mafia, in the war in Italy during WW II, when underground figures having ties with the Axis powers were utilized .Desperate times called for desperate measures.

After the drop of ideology were outbid, the kernels of political life, upstaged by a policy worthy of the final blooming of utilitarian development , coming home to roost as a stratified pragmatism, it was with the utmost surprise of surprises, that euro-existentialism of friendship’s nihilistic forbearance of any changes. should suddenly reveal a movement away from principle.

The distinction between ideology and principle is unique, at least in the context of modern 20th century politics, however the realization of China and the Far East becoming major players , did not, noticeably occur to post war planners.

China was at a very backward watershed, at a point when the Japanese Empire’s destruction. may have created the ultimate illusion of non viability of Asia per se.

The mixed economies of transitional countries , may have signaled a drastic change in a metaphoric way, but did not bring forth the strength of Chinese myth, whereby all actual political formations were buried under unheard levels of pretension, opportunism, and inauthenticity, as signs of coping with Occidental existential angst. The dramatic diversity from Russian nihilism , for instance , was never transparent enough in China, and a succeeding related clarity was unimaginable as well as irrelevant to social reality

Asia represents pure imminence flowing reversely from supposition to construction

Deconstruction was never idiomatic in the Orient, and ideology was merely of a cosmetic application, to placate the USSR.

What if, isolationism fails ?
In wake of the G7 summit, where contradictory messages are touted by both sides; with Trump supporters labeling him a president with a backbone, while members of Europian and Canadian foes labeling him otherwise, while his internal foes declaring him unfit and self-serving, among others, there forms the triple dixothomy proceeding Hitler’s stunning political rise.

Internal perceptions on the left.view his preferential friends.toward the Chinese, the Russians at the cost of abandoning traditional allies, worrisome, and it can not be fathomed how this triple conflict can come to a smooth transition.

Not withstanding that what can be based to support this trend?

Uplifting the technological front : the Supercomputer -Summit, places the U.S. again on the number one list in computation, perhaps it can help create a scenario where Trumpism can safely figure into this fuzzy diplomacy.

The pope , for the first time has publicly commented on climate change , by a meet with oil executives, to express the urgency with which they ahould approach the technology behind attainment of clean air.

Hope more announcements are forth coming from a personage of.more.apparent authority and honesty then this perceived of Trump

Trump is getting a lot of PR, but not much anything else, now to test the intelligence of the average American voter, lets see what goes down in the US biannual elections.

The proof is in the pudding, Trump has been declared a closet Kantian, and unfortunately the good behind laissez faire is not shared by better dealmakers then he is. I wonder how long this charade will go on, and intelligent but naive pseudo idealists can replace the material dialectic as easily as reactionaries , imagine.

HOT off the press:

Rudy Juliani aays Mueller investigation will be suspended upon showing political bias on of the Justice Departmwnt over the Clinton server use issue. Also the state of New York is suing the Trump foundation for fraud…

Its coming to a very tough fight. and nasties are coming to town…

Pope Francis today accused abortion by comparing them to Nazi eugenics. 6/17/2018. The significance of this indicates the Holy See’s increasing involvement in moral issues.

Watch for more as the moral equilibrium becomes more and more out of whack and leadership of quality people will fade away with brazen evaporation of model leadership.
That all this was foretold , can be interpreted (with shivers down spines).

There is omnious rumblings over quanta time implying future events can change past events , where the present is becoming ever more fleeting.

Only the mysteries of higher powers is suggestive of keeping the present at hand , from falling into the past or the future past.

Now the real issues over identity, the German Chancellor’s coalition almost collapsed overnight because of a Trump tweet declaring Germany’s crime rate catapulting because of her compassionate stance on immigration.

The New Times quote ascribing this a momentous. .time of projecting this issue overseas as an emerging front from which to project his insecurities at home?
Other nations Hungary being another, is similarly in the same predicament of trying to elude the implications of a nationalistic front

What is happening here?

Is the increasing fear of minorities looking wearily civil rights gained during the 1960’s, or, is it something more ominous during the ad.I situation of a half German populist president fueling fears of racial recurrence?

Obviously, politicians and diplomats are of the opinion that this present discontent is manageable, even if the emerging social discontent rises to levels not seen since the multiformed riots in the streets.

Whose opinion , or presumption rules now, Sessions, Trump’s?
Is a resurgent conflict over the precise identifiable cause for nationalism deter.unable in the here and now? Or, is the cause beyond analysis in a new evolving affect from the effects of the confusions of every man, stemming from having had too sudden exposure to the dehumanizing sources of social change?

What are the dehumanizing sources of social change? You really think that every man/woman has confusions?

The President tweeted,

"Dems are the problem, they don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants no matter how bad they maybe, to pour into and infest our country.

And here is an editorial reply ,:

The President’s language further escalated his DEHUMANIZING rhetoric amid a developing humanitarian and political crisis on the US border with Mexico.

Now it becomes personal, when each child is separated from his/her parent. Think of the extreme trauma.

Or, is the justification offered by Mr. Sessions sufficiently credible - at this time, the matter is one of optical morality, with little or no precedent apart from the Japanese Internment.

Who is Trump dehumanizing? If anything, Democrats dehumanize their very own USA citizens by allowing catch and release of criminals (all illegals are criminals) and open borders with their illegal sanctuary cities and obstruction of justice. Anyone who wants to be a USA citizens needs to get in line with all the other immigrants and asylum seekers to fill out the paperwork to be vetted and given citizenship the legal way when it is their turn.

50,000 illegals try to cross the borders each month.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u4Vlgr2iHs[/youtube]

If the parents cannot prove they are parents, then the kids should be and are removed from human traffickers. If the parents have valid documentation, then the kids should be kept with parents in their own area. But Democrats and some Republicans have done nothing but balk at the law rather than getting to work in Congress to change it so the families can remain together until they are deported or processed IN LINE for their right to stay.

Wendy: It is neither this or that , the left or right, it is the central issue of borders-boundaries , which is perceived as dehumanizing, in its scope . Its a catch 22, and rhetoric has lost its power to choose between them, which in very large painted in VERY LARGE letters, create a the myopia of being closer them reality , and create a the illusion that things can’t get personal , or even that they can. But they can and will, with a presumption that such does not exist.

But that it is and it requires a wide moral compass to apprehend, it almost appears a sui generis , whereas it blurs the line between its de-facto and de-jure elements.

It IS this and not that. There’s nothing dehumanizing about borders when they are approached with respect to the laws governing them.

Why is it dehumanizing when our country wishes to maintain its integrity with boundaries?
EDITED: A huge fucking rant.

I’m sure You understand why can’t reply with an expletive, but assure You regardless to any and every post made I will answer. wouldn’t do it to others and do not mean I have no nerve. Its something else.

Defensively, which I would never do on principle, reflect an Ediitorial response to Trump’s tweet is linked to responsibility to its poster, who happens to be a major newspaper. It may or may not carry over to me, but then its my decision.

As always: Meno

The word dehumanized originated with that newspaper response to the Trump tweet, and may or may not represent my views.

Any collusive act or attempt between groups, that changes intrinsic and assumed relationship between people, to attempt to. form less identifiable and specific group memberships , can be understood as dehumanizing members of the group in question.

By not differentiating children from a general population demotes special privileges children are assumed to be entitled to.

Lets say I belonged to a group experts having exclusive membership to that particular group by means of specific
skills, and someone were to make that membership more general and non specific in terms of qualifications dues, etc,. then that would lessen my required skills, knowledge and self worth as qualifiable as to that group’s requirements.That would dehumanize the qualifying of my conditions to membership.

#-o Huh?

Meno, when are you going to stop hating on Trump,inquiring minds want to know?

I am surprised at that interpretation. I so notnhabe any emotional reactions negative or positive, and my neutrality swings between the two sure, but amongst the fluctuations lays somewhere a happy middle ground, where things somehow manage to balance out there .

Recently I read in a philosophy website. I can research it where , months ago , but I was stupified to learn of some rigorous thinkers consider him basically a closer Kantian

I don’t know of there is such a thing as a philosophy derived from the statements, pronouncements and actions ofnaixj said thinker, but many of the elements suggested which can correlated to a middle course, surprisingly resonate with more people them previously thought.

That my personal biases are exposed, may be mitigated by some unconscious leaning s, however , consciously, try to set the course right down the middle, and as has been suggested Trump really defines a new Republicanism, whether its tending toward am independent course, which may be at this decisive times the developing voice of a hidden to arrive majority.

But to set that tone, both the left’s and the political right’s dynamics has to be exposed for what they are.

That we are all dubious to an extent of claims and counterclaims of various sorts .that need not tale away from the search for the truth of political reality.

But agree that at times . a bias can become evident in the most earnest of neutral positions.
I think he is a modified Kantian, yet infused with large doses of pragmatism.