Gender Divide

This may be true in certain cases to a certain degree but it is not NECESSARILY about intelligence. The women who do defend their selves are usually better able to or at least try to or in the moment have the opportunity (see an opening) to rise above the fear and to do what has to be done…in order not to make herself a victim. It has a lot more to do with our survival instincts and in some cases how we value ourselves and a lot less to do with intelligence…unless you are speaking of street smarts here which do have to do with intelligence (as in gathering information and acting on it) to a certain degree.

Trust me. I know what I am talking about here.

You’re another woman-victim. My words are not for you and your ilk. If a woman were proud of herself, if she were raised by a strong father, then she would never give-in to victim complex and slave-mentality. She would refuse to be a victim. She would defend herself, and her honor. She would know men, through her father. However this is rare. And this is not you.

I know victim-mentality too well, now.

Most ‘modern’ women are victims, weaklings, stupid. Yes I am a misogynist in that I do not respect women who cling to victim-hood. But I am a woman-lover with those women in the world, rarer, who have self-worth, who have pride, who have something (Chastity) worth defending.

You are not like those women. You are not of the ilk. Most women do not have something worth defending, and hate themselves, appropriately. Most women are “victims”.

Fatherless. Without pride. Without self-love. Without self-confidence. Without self-worth.

Why are most (Modern) women victims? Why do they have low self-esteem, self-worth, self-identity? Because they are bastards. Because they are fatherless. This also demonstrates in females, in general, the ‘flocking’ mechanism to “bad-boys” or any male posing (faking) as an alpha-male. Fatherless women (Modern women) are stupid/ignorant/innocent insofar that they were not raised by a father-figure, not raised by a man, and so cannot tell the difference in males between the real and the fakery. This is a big cause, if not the main and predominant cause, for the flocking mechanism to the “bad boy”. Females flock to what they are lacking, a rebellious, contemptuous, strong-minded man.

The women that do have fathers, and are raised well, are more Noble and rare. These women have a strong sense of self, self-identity, self-worth, self-pride, self-love, self-confidence. These are the types of women who would fight tooth-and-nail if a rapist ever attacked them. They would fight back, ferociously. These are the most respectable types of women.

I’ve observed this a lot throughout life. Even other women, other females, flock to the “strong woman” rarity and oddity. I’ve seen women protect a girl’s virginity, because they want to preserve her innocence. Whereas with other girls, women will throw them under the bus, trick them into losing virginity, trick them into being a slut, etc. Women pick and choose from each-other too, who to defend, and who to outcast. These are ‘female’ politics, hidden from the view of the world, and especially from males. Women don’t talk about these things publicly. But my keen eye watches all things, all phenomenons.

Why are some females guarded (loved) and others, not? Why do some women have great worth and value, and others, not?

I would pose these types of questions to you all. But I already know that none of you have sufficient answers. So I will ask. And I will answer, myself.

These arguments should convince that some women are in fact, worth fighting for, worth guarding, worth aspiring toward. Some women are superior than others.

NO equality. NO equality between men and women. NO equality between women and women. NO equality between men and men. NO equality anywhere. That’s fine with me. But it’s not fine with you, the person reading this. Equality is a liberal, youthful idealism. And it is meaningless. It has no grounding in reality. MEANWHILE, you do the same as I say above. Even the person reading this, has preferences, of some men above other men, and of some women above other women.

Therefore, when some dumb bitch like Arcturus paints me as a “misogynist”, she will know, and others will know, fully why and how she is wrong. I am no more a “misogynist” than Arcturus is, or anybody else.

And rather these are accusations of personal flaws. So the better question to ask is, why does Arcturus hate women? Or worse, why does Arcturus hate herself???

Me, personally??? I’m not interested. I have bigger fish to fry. If others want to talk more about gender, then I recommend the “Gender Everything” thread.

Consider this.

If you had to worry about a rapist, haven’t you already done many, many things wrong, made many mistakes? For example, first question to ask yourself, how the fuck were you so stupid and careless, to allow such a male into close proximity in the first place??? You probably aren’t stupid enough to walk through a dark alley at 3am when everybody is drunk and there is a group of thirsty men, thugs, dealing drugs there. But are you ‘smart’ enough to catch a more deceptive male, a liar, in your midst? Are you smart enough to discern the roofies in one drink, at a frat party? Are you smart enough to get “that creepy feeling” from a male acquaintance?

Moderns say that “most rapes are committed by family friends, close relatives, etc”. What does this mean, exactly, except that a moron woman already let the “rapist” into her midst, into her social circle?

Deception is powerful though. There are many males who are great, outstanding liars. “Psychopaths”, very intelligent, and yes, if you let your guard down, then you better be careful and I think we all know the results.

But a very intelligent woman? Not a chance, really. Hypothetically, she’s smarter than the psychopath, and already saw him coming, and already (tried, and failed) to warn some of her friends away, before it was too late.

You know what I mean. You cannot claim that women are “victims” in such a case.

It took you a year to get back to me?

Better late than never?

This thread is cancer.

My final verdict is this.

Some hedonism is good, but too much is bad. Joker (in batman) is an example of a proud hedonist “Pride” at being a rebel.
Rebelliousness is male. Cuckservatives are not male.

Male=a metaphor for one who dominates, one who penetrates
Female=a metaphor for one who accepts and submits
Shemale=someone who looks like a female-ish, but has a penis, but has both dominant and submissive sexual tendencies.

Now the simple fact is everyone wants a chaste woman. The fact is that deep down people do not prefer prostitutes. Everyone wants that special somepony. The more she sleeps around the less special u feel. but alas, it is not a perfect world.

So pros and cons, u get bored of your women, or all the women you connect with are taken, so what do you do? You get a slut.

Women ought to be sluts, but not whores. Sleepin’ with 1000 different people is too many. 10 is acceptable. But no more than 100.

This is the problem of porn. It is like, sleeping with 1000 different people, but you never make any personal connection. Its reminscent of warlord Ghengis Khan and how he slept with 16000 different women in absolutely meaningless sex.

Far as gay pride goes, I think half of gays turned gay and deep down want the vagina. So half of em aint proud really. But I think some of gays are true gays and really are proud of coming out of the closet. Also i think most transsexuals are proud of being a woman, its a neitzchean thing of transforming your body, much like a videogame boss of creating a giant mech like team rocket, team rocket is also trans.

Far as the other gendered stuff, people are sheltered and ignorant. I think many males are ignored of slaughterhouses and so are many females. I think its hogwash to say that all females are ignorant of war and slaughterhouses, many females are not ignorant of those things. However you are correct at that Men generally suck at politicians since women are more social minded.

Now for the Ecmandu rant I think women are attracted to douchebags but not neccesarily assholes. Turd furgeson is a douchebag but deep down he wants a better planet. Now the main thing people wont admit is this.

Main thing people wont admit, is that most women are lesbians, this is scientifically proven of course. Because of this, they ain’t easy. Its like this, gays get bathhouses but males get diddly squat. Women tend to be standoffish and hard to get. So Ecmandu has a point but he wont admit the main fact of the situation, that most women are closet lesbians. Its a duplicity they wont admit when asked but when science measured them with scanners the truth was found. Now them bein’ lesbians dont mean they dont like dick. They like dick but maybe not the thing attached to the dick. Women care more about personality cause of their lack of physical attraction to most men. I mean lets get real folks men stank and who wants to smell that bo. most women jack off to lesbo porn. Aint sayin they wont bang a man but the man has to seduce them first usually. so ecmandu is a little bit right. Its not cool that if your born male u always got to be the one chasin’. But at the same time, eliot rodgers was insane and delusional, he should have nutted up and at least got rejected a few times before he threw in the towel. as it stands, he was insane and i dont respect him. he hated love and wanted a world with only men and no love. Eliot is my worst nightmare if it was the wild west id gun him down in a noble duel. my dream is a world of women and love, that is a great world in my book. far as mma goes Not a big fan, also i wish the women of mma had bigger boobs and were more sexy like those street fighter chicks. far as weight lifting goes, i love a woman with abs but not a big fan of veiny manly lookin chicks. I like chicks who look like guys but not men, theres a difference, some chicks have a guyish appearance which is cute, but when they turn full blown man its just like, eh, not really into men personally.

Only after you step in it.

nope. id say my post is the equivalent of a taco bell tostada, sloppy, juicy, and the equivalent of absolute divine nocturnal salvation/salivation.

urs is the equivalent of a cuban cigar, classy, manly, 'n toxik as fuk

No ur bad.

sometimes but not right now.

Ur dumb

incorrect. i have a high iq

U have low iq

incorrect. my iq is higher than 153. I took the test, but took a ten minute break. It gave me only a measly 153. Had I not took the ten minute break, i probably would have got 170 or something.

you say ur smart but u dont act like smart

act smart? smart equals results. facts. logics. wisdoms. all of which i provide in large doses

We ALL are at times, both men and women alike. Have I been at times? Yes, I have been and I suppose that there will be other times when I will be until I suddenly become aware of where I am at and what I am doing to myself in the moment.

.

But I still have the freedom to respond to your post to me.

Well then that leaves me out of the equation since I was not raised by any father.
Human beings are complex and we are not perfect creatures. Our psyches are not totally 100% perfect, balanced, self-aware in every moment. There are any number of things which might tend to make us lose awareness or weaken us in the moment; for instance, what we consider to be love but which is just physical attraction, lust, masochism, having a bad day, being distracted by many things in the normal course of a day.

Love and attention IS very important and for a women, especially given by a mother as an example of what it means to be a woman. But again, we are all so imperfect.

Hopefully, yes, she would rise to that occasion. But self awareness is not something which is automatically given to us when we need it - at least I do not believe it is. It can be a process, a vertical one. But each time I do intuit that the climb is quicker and easier.

Are you talking about a physical attack here or any attack, verbal or otherwise.
Can you give me another word for honor in this case.

A woman, if she is lucky enough, can also come to know what a genuine caring man is from coming in contact with other real caring humane men.

Unfortunately you may correct in this day and age. But there are those rare men. That is why they are called rare.

No it is not. I am quite aware of the journey which I have been on and I would not trade it for anything. But we are lucky at times when something or other sends someone to us which when we need to learn some lessons or need to discover who we are.

So, are you part of the problem or part of the solution when you come face to face with it. Are you helpful toward women or are you a force for destruction?

Okay, that just answered the above question.

Do you ever try to find out how a women came to that place?
Personally, I think that it takes a really strong man who knows himself to see a woman like the above and not be afraid to see value within her, not be afraid to find and bring out that value.

I am not so sure that that is being a woman love not in the true sense of the world.
Have you ever tried to question what it is that will not allow you to embrace the imperfections in women?
Is it perhaps that deep dark shadow side within you? We all have one.

lol Nice to meet you, Sir Lancelot.

We all have something worth defending. Many women (and men) have just not discovered it unfortunately due to their fathers or their mothers. Women will not value their selves if they cannot see something of value. So why do you not help them?

Nature is bountiful and is capable of teaching us many things, can pull things out of us which we did not realize were there.
Also, fortunately for us, there are those around us who can teach us about ourselves, show us a different glimpse in the mirror other than the one formed by those who themselves needed one to teach them.

There is nothing noble about being superior to some other man. The true nobility is in being superior to your previous self. ~Hindu Proverb

can u present some more results, facts, logics, and wisdom? i want to see it

I used to be helpful when I was young, when I was a child. I had idealism back then. I believed in “the good”. But as an adult, after connecting the dots, after acquiring wisdom, I know more of “the truth”. And truth is: Many/Most cannot be helped. It’s not a matter of helping. Here’s a quick point for you to make sense of things. I can’t “help” that modern women, girls, are born as bastards and fatherless (like you-yourself have no father). That’s not a matter of my choosing. I suppose that a man could turn into a religious leader, head a cult, try to re-instill moral and family values. But even then, I don’t necessarily believe that either. Because nature is powerful. Even if you, hypothetically, changed social values so that more girls had more fathers or father-figures, more morality and family-values, then would it stay that way, or just be temporary? It would just be temporary. Because you can’t change people’s natures, at least, not indefinitely.

You can exert a great pressure to pervert and twist a person’s nature around into circles. But once you let go of that exertion, the person’s nature returns to its original form. Same with genetics. So even if you could boost social fatherhood, if you took away the artificial boost, then people (women) would return to their bastard roots. There is a strong undercurrent, reason, and causation, underneath fatherless progeny. It’s biological. It’s sociological. It’s pathological.

Quite frankly, there’s very few reasons and benefits to “help women”. Because, again, it means that you are a victim. You are not (already) “helping yourself”. Thus you are a dependent. And mankind is independent. This is what your language suggests. And it’s correct. Thus how could anybody ever hope to “change” humanity when the cost is too great, when it would be temporary at best, and when there are few (or no) beneficial reasons to?

I’m considering more ‘Destructive’ methods. Being “good” all the time is a childish, naive proposition. There is more fun in being “bad” and “evil”.

Here’s my greater point: if a woman truly wanted independence and autonomy, then she would already be striving and struggling to attain it, on her own, of her own volition. She would not need a man’s help, or anybody’s. Certainly not mine. So that is what I mean when I say that I would (and do) respect such women, rare as they are. Coincidentally, “ironically?”, such women almost always have strong biological father-figures. Thus such women take after her father’s guise as a matter of Pride. In this way, pride cannot be underestimated.

Pride = Self-love, Self-confidence, Self-esteem.

This is another childish idealism, a feel-good dream. Reality exemplifies the opposite. Not all life is worth living. Not all life has value. People take away, negate, steal, destroy each-other’s value on a daily basis. Nature is Predatory, dog-eat-dog. Those who have something worth defending, have fought and struggled to build it up. That is the fact of life. To level it all down with “we are all valuable, all worthy” is an insult. It’s an insult to those who build amazing things for themselves, who achieve excellence, who win big, who succeed in life. It’s an insult to the winners of life.

And it also implies that “it’s okay to be a loser”. Maybe to you, that’s acceptable. Not to me. The loser-mentality is an anchor, a dead-weight. There is no “worth defending” about that. It’s the winners who have most to lose.

For example, can you build up $1,000,000 in assets from nothing? Do you have what it takes? Probably not. Most people cannot build very high from nothing. Those who are rich, are usually so, because they are born into wealth, and inherit it.

So it goes with Pride too (some are born into it, most others, are not).