But Peter, does the thought ever occur to you if you’re aware, that maybe the machine that may work, is one where. at death, the thought of what’s at the other side, there may be something or some One ?
K: and that is the classic idea of Deus ex Machina…
on the other side “may be” something or someone…
so your thought is to that something or someone instead
of, on the here and now… you neglect the present time
and place for a “may be”…… in hopes of being saved or seating
at the right hand of god… which by the way, sounds really, really,
really boring………
not me…I stand with the here and now, instead of some
“may be”…
Kropotkin
Peter,
I meant it literally, thoughts. in the here and now about what your thougjtsay be , when faced with imminent death, - whether Then, may you be thinking about the other side.
Your tho long now about it does not exclude your thinking about THEN, even if you believe that living in the now does exclude the Then.
think about what has happened in your life…
think about how much happened by the already set programming
you have as a human being…and think about how much happened
without any input from you…you have very few choices in life…
you are born… not much of a choice there… you grow from
a newborn to a toddler…no choice there…you learn langague,
and you learn to crawl and you learn to walk and you learn to say no…
all of this follows the programming set in the DNA…
it is instinctual… and you grow all the while…
nothing to think about there… it just happens…
and as you grow, you more able to do more things…
again, as set by your programming…math, langagues,
science, the humanities… all things you learn as you grow up
you don’t teach a 4 year old science because they won’t be able to
understand it just yet, they aren’t developed enough…but you can teach them
stuff they can handle at 4 years of age…again, per programming…
and you grow into an adult… you have a certain height and weight
and hair color and skin color… and none of which you have any control over…
as you age, you change… your body changes…at one point in time,
I could run 15 miles a day and do a 5 minute mile… at one point in time…
today, I can’t… simple as that… I have aged to the point where I can’t do these
things anymore…and none of it is within my control…
and I face other things out of my control… I am slowly balding… I still have
hair… but nowhere as much as I used to…I have become an old man…
and I cannot control that… and I shall get grow older…
the simple tasks I can do today, will become harder and harder to do…
and then one fine day, I shall be on death’s door… another thing I had
no control over and another thing that is a part of this thing called life…
death is just another step along the line of life… like gaining hair and then
many years later losing hair… like being 5 foot 8 inches tall… I have no control
over that and I have no control over that next step of death…
I can wail and moan and cry over my fate… but it is a fate every single
human being has faced and will face… it is just another step…
one I cannot forestall or change……….it will happen…….
I will just be another name in the obituary column…
I will cease to exist and a few years later, be completely and totally
forgotten……. it is as if I never existed…
and there ain’t a dam thing I can do about it…
it is just another step in being a living creature…
being at death’s door……… I will knock and boldly open that door…
what else can I do?
why would I be afraid of something that is as natural as losing my hair or
being 200 pounds or being 5ft 8……… it is just another process that I will
go through as I have gone through many, many other processes in my life…
to be afraid of death is to be afraid of growing my hair or having my nails grow…
and it is as natural as growing my hair or having my nails grow………
just another step…maybe the last, maybe the first… who knows…
and frankly who cares… because you have no control over that either…
being at death’s door doesn’t frighten me…
and it shouldn’t frighten you because it is just another natural step
we take as human beings and a step we have no control over anyway…
so at death’s door, knock… and boldly enter………
it is just another door and you have passed through thousands
of doors in your life… death’s door is just another one…
Kropotkin
True, but its also instinctual to fear, and even animals fear each other, but underneath that fear is the sub instinct for continued existence and although animals don’t know what that is, it is the fear of losing it which is bothering them.
No human can admit to not to fear the unknown
K: an what exactly is the unknown?
and can we have any control over something that is unknown?
and as far as fear goes, we can control our fear… and we can even
rise above fear… we needn’t allow fear to control us…
as I have grown older, I have feared less…
when I was younger, I had fears, oh my, did I fear…
I was afraid of death and afraid of life and afraid of heights
and afraid of young republicans… I had all sorts of fears…
now that I am old… I see no reason for those fears…
ok, be afraid of young republicans… they are fucking evil…
but the rest…ahhh, whatever…
my problem is no longer fear but pure lazyness…
little seems to be worth the effort it takes…
but that is another problem for another day…
Kropotkin
as I have been sick for a couple of weeks, I had to call in sick
the last couple of days and most likely will call in sick tomorrow…
I have been laying low and resting… doing some reading…
and I have noticed something… I jumped ahead a bit… instead of
David Hume, I have been reading 19 and 20 century writers…
and after so much reading Hume and about Hume, I have noticed that
the writers of the 19the and 20th century are so much more complex
then Hume… compared to later writers, Hume is complicated but not
complex… in other words, Hume is pretty simple compared
to later writers… compare ummm, Heidegger to Hume…or Hume to Kierkegaard…
Kierkegaard was writing less then a 100 after Hume’s death and yet it seems to
be a million years after his death… Hume’s concerns are rather simple
and straightforward compared to Kierkegaard or to Heidegger………
the problem of existence for Hume is nowhere as complicated as the
problem of existence is for anyone in the 19th or 20th century including
Kierkegaard or Heidegger…and why is that? I have suggested that
it is in large part to the changing modes of production as Marx would call them…
in other words, the Industrial revolution…
the world is simpler for Hume and it shows in his writings……
by the time of Kierkegaard, the world had dramatically change
and become far more complicated………
and today? we have so many things going on that we can’t even focus
on one or two… how we can philosophize when we can’t even keep up
with the many events and experiences going on around us…
for that is, in part, the point of philosophy, to understand experiences
and events…but as I have suggested before… I believe philosophy is
about understanding experiences in terms of values…
science can tell us about a certain experiences…for example thunder…
and what created thunder… and religion can say, thunder
is a result of god’s displeasure with us……. but thunder is not
a philosophical matter because it doesn’t involve values…
science can tell us that love is a chemical combination
in the brain and religion can tell us that love is a gift
from god… but philosophy can tell us the value of love…
and philosophy can tell us that love has a greater value then
hate or anger and philosophy can tell us why love has
a greater value…………
so we have two points, one is the world is a far more complicated place
today, then in the time of David Hume and we must face this complicated
place in our philosophy and second, philosophy deals with values…
so, the values that Hume dwelt with are simpler then the values
we deal with today because the world is a far more complicated place today…
and we must change and adapt to the far greater complicate world of today…
but this is why we haven’t had a “great” philosopher of late because the
the task at hand is a massive undertaking…what values are the values
of today and why should we pick certain values over other values…
given the complicity of today, our understanding of values is
far too limited…and that is too bad… we must expand our
thinking and wondering to the very edge of what is philosophy in
order to encompass all the values that are possible today…
a tall order indeed…
Kropotkin
I admire You, but a very basic dear is related to the question. ’ to be or not to be’
That is before the door is crossed. It is an unknown, and could not be answered then, nor could it now. It’s alike asking a fetus in the time of conception, whether it wants to keep on developing. Even now, with the unresolved issue of early assisted termination of life, the question remains.
The answer I feel will never be solved . as it hasn’t with abortion .
M: I admire You, but a very basic dear is related to the question. ’ to be or not to be’
That is before the door is crossed. It is an unknown, and could not be answered then, nor could it now. It’s alike asking a fetus in the time of conception, whether it wants to keep on developing. Even now, with the unresolved issue of early assisted termination of life, the question remains.
The answer I feel will never be solved . as it hasn’t with abortion .
K: several points… first a fetus has no understanding because it has no experiences
to judge upon… to judge requires context and context is just another word
for experiences… secondly don’t be too sure what the fetus might say about being
asked to keep on developing… for I was an fetus that was damaged by German measles
and lost most of my hearing and if you had asked me if I wanted to continue to
“developed” I might have said no, because trust me when I say, life as
a handicap person is very, very tough and I wouldn’t wish that fate upon
anyone… Ok, maybe IQ45 but that is to so he might get a conscience or
develop some feelings about his fellow human beings… but him being
a narcissistic psychopath, means he will never develop a conscience
or an understanding of what it means to be human…
Kropotkin
Peter, by now we can perhaps talk in a manner which befits friends. And that is, our conversation. Includes certain things we may have learned from ea h other. At one point in time when we were both going to Europe , we exchanged some items relating to our families , that of our relationship ships with our respective daughters, the substance of which escapes me, thank god perhaps because my recent memory has always been very deficient in terms of instant recall.
At any rate , the reason for this mention , is that I recall principles and not particulars, and as it happens to relate to our particular discussion here.
So it struck me , that the question. of recall may effectively block existential and teleological problems, in particular the recall of fetuses and ordinary experienced people , here in this context.
The big issue here, has to do with inherited and experienced types of mindsets, and this puts am entirely different spin on our conversation .
How can we assert without doubt that the genetic inheritance does not include large general neuron pathways, which pre form functions have to do with major decisions in later life, whether and irrespective to the stage of a human finds, or, is found to be determinate in his later development?
Must the standard of Darwinian supposition preclude the mind as opposed to the brain function?
Darwin was shown to have undermined a very credible showing,neural adaptation as the primal function of.coding , as opposed to biological natural selection? : causing that particular Viennese biologist’s suicide.
These last.two paragraphs , omit as You wish, they may be out of.the general context of discussion.
So, what the fetus possesses in scripted neural pathways is not to say what the fetus ‘knows’ . but what he may come to know, if it is allowed to develop. If knowledge is qualified by what is signified as.conscious knowledge, then the objection has been properly summed into acceptable definition
Until then, we really do not know, even the minimum issue worth examining. that pertains to minimal understanding of a newborn child. There is no way as of yet to techno-interfere with living fetuses, although along the way,medical ethics objectively may overcome even that threshold.
I’m glad You brought in Trumpism, for.there’s no way any one could guess the high degree of a higher sense of public acceptance to his ideas: easily showing a new higher collusion between the general public with Congress and the Judiciary.
A year ago , this could not be even imaginable
The point taken fits Lambigous’ higher subjective notions, based on guesses that limits of tolerance to understanding may entail
These issues interface, and why not? They are philosophy, one’s perception perches on the high ground, another’s in the low, teleological AND/OR QM ( it primaryl logic)
A sensible middle has not yet developed, although by the same token, they have perhaps been already neuro scripted.
I want to answer Your next blog but since my blog and and Yours came through almost a.split minute apart, I’d rather edit my version rather than set up a faulty implication.
The Authority is suspect, because it can be scripted genetically, in many cases, and cannot be altered even with the aid of whatever: psychoanalysis, past life regression, or levels of experiencial gain of knowledge. It is not an either or logical acquisition, but an undifferentiated primal script, which can go either way.
we often understand by authority… which is to say,
we use authority to help us understand our experiences…
we might use god or the bible or Aristotle or capitalism
or communism…all of which is authority…
and which is used to explain who we are and what
is our purpose…
but is authority really an good means to use when
understanding? for example, we have the authority of
the bible…and many still proclaim its priority in leading
our lives… but, but think about the bible…the new testament
was written 2000 years ago and the old testament is much older…the
old testament was written by rural, farmers and sheep herders…
now my life today has nothing to do with rural farming…
how can the authority of the bible explain our modern age?
it was written for a rural, farming community… not our modern age
of cars and the industrial revolution and Hiroshima and Auschwitz…
I used to love this show called “connections” which followed
connections from one event to another event…
these connections were often obsure and took many different paths…
but some events and experiences are so far apart as to defy
any attempts to make a connection…and the authority of the bible
is so far apart from my experiences that to be useless…
so for me to use authority to understand my life is to
use very tenuous connections to connect my life to
said authority……. for example, to use Aristotle to understand
my life is a rather tenuous connection…… it might work if
I understand that Aristotle wrote for a Greek society over 2500 years ago…
context is everything… and context means experience……
so for me to use authority is to understand that authority
in context for me…even to use, say Descartes as an authority
is to know/understand that Descartes wrote over 300 years ago in a totally
different environment…….
so which authority should I use then? Marx or Freud or Adam Smith or Nietzsche?
or should I use some ism or ideology as authority? Capitalism or communism or
fascism or democracy? which recent authority should I use? as a modern man,
I can see the failure of the ism’s and ideologies of today…when the history books
are written about today, they will comment on the total collapse of our current
ism’s and ideologies………they, ism’s and ideologies, have failed because they are
about context and experiences which don’t match our current situation…
in other words, our ism’s and ideologies are about context and experiences
that no longer exist today…for example, capitalism has clearly failed…
how can we use that authority to base our lives upon if it is a failure…
we cannot depend upon authority because our current situation
has no other precedent… we cannot look to the past for solutions
because the past has no examples of our current situation…
we are facing problems stemming from the industrial revolution
that have never existed before… and so the past or authority won’t
solve our problems because the problems didn’t exist in the past…
the solution or solutions must come from the context/experience
of our times and not from authority……………
for example, biblical examples like, “be fruitful and multiply”
are not only no longer possible, but downright dangerous for
us… given our current situation…… we must find another solution
besides “be fruitful and multiply”…in the context of our times,
one of the overwhelming problems is overpopulation and that leads
to massive pollution and massive use of resources and the extinction of
species that we need in order for us to survive…
but ism’s like capitalism lead us to forsake intelligent solutions
in the name of the authority of the past…….
holding to authority like capitalism or the bible leads us to
take actions that endanger our generation and generations after us…
so what is the solution? learn to forsake those authorities
that we are taught like the biases and myths and prejudices
and superstitions of our childhood…
Kropotkin
Meno: Peter, by now we can perhaps talk in a manner which befits friends. And that is, our conversation. Includes certain things we may have learned from ea h other. At one point in time when we were both going to Europe , we exchanged some items relating to our families , that of our relationship ships with our respective daughters, the substance of which escapes me, thank god perhaps because my recent memory has always been very deficient in terms of instant recall.
At any rate , the reason for this mention , is that I recall principles and not particulars, and as it happens to relate to our particular discussion here.
K: ok…
M: So it struck me , that the question. of recall may effectively block existential and teleological problems, in particular the recall of fetuses and ordinary experienced people , here in this context.
K: ummm, not sure exactly what you mean?
M: The big issue here, has to do with inherited and experienced types of mindsets, and this puts am entirely different spin on our conversation .
How can we assert without doubt that the genetic inheritance does not include large general neuron pathways, which pre form functions have to do with major decisions in later life, whether and irrespective to the stage of a human finds, or, is found to be determinate in his later development?
K: these question of “inherited or experienced mindset” as of right now, lies outside
of our knowledge… we cannot assume for or against…
M: Must the standard of Darwinian supposition preclude the mind as opposed to the brain function?
Darwin was shown to have undermined a very credible showing,neural adaptation as the primal function of.coding , as opposed to biological natural selection? : causing that particular Viennese biologist’s suicide.
K: not sure again what you mean?
M: So, what the fetus possesses in scripted neural pathways is not to say what the fetus ‘knows’ . but what he may come to know, if it is allowed to develop. If knowledge is qualified by what is signified as.conscious knowledge, then the objection has been properly summed into acceptable definition
Until then, we really do not know, even the minimum issue worth examining. that pertains to minimal understanding of a newborn child. There is no way as of yet to techno-interfere with living fetuses, although along the way,medical ethics objectively may overcome even that threshold.
K: You at least acknowledge the number of assumptions made in these two paragraphs…
I try to avoid assumptions… often failing…….
M: I’m glad You brought in Trumpism, for.there’s no way any one could guess the high degree of a higher sense of public acceptance to his ideas: easily showing a new higher collusion between the general public with Congress and the Judiciary.
A year ago , this could not be even imaginable
K: I try to connect my thoughts with current events/experiences…
M: The point taken fits Lambigous’ higher subjective notions, based on guesses that limits of tolerance to understanding may entail
These issues interface, and why not? They are philosophy, one’s perception perches on the high ground, another’s in the low, teleological AND/OR QM ( it primaryl logic)
K: once again, I admit to failing to understand what you are saying…
M: A sensible middle has not yet developed, although by the same token, they have perhaps been already neuro scripted.
K: this is not clear to me…
M: I want to answer Your next blog but since my blog and and Yours came through almost a.split minute apart, I’d rather edit my version rather than set up a faulty implication.
The Authority is suspect, because it can be scripted genetically, in many cases, and cannot be altered even with the aid of whatever: psychoanalysis, past life regression, or levels of experiencial gain of knowledge. It is not an either or logical acquisition, but an undifferentiated primal script, which can go either way.
[/quote]
K: people like to follow authority because it is far easier to follow someone else
then to take control over one’s life… it is easier to follow someone else because
then blame can be shifted to the authority instead of where it belongs, at one’s
doorstep…this is the battle of the Enlightenment all the way through
existentialism…taking responsibility for one’s life…often begins with
denying authority and seaching for oneself as what is the correct path to
follow…in part, in part, is why I reject god and the bible and any
religious authority… because to follow the authority of god or the bible
or of religion is to abdicate my own personal responsibility for my actions…
to follow god or the bible or the koran or any religion is to give that authority
the right of judgment over me…now, I am not going to even accept the
authority of biology to determine my actions… be it the programming I
have within me… be it mental or be it DNA…I am more then my programming…
to become fully human… one must rise above DNA or the genetic programming
we have… we must become more then our base lower level of behavior
that is let loose by IQ45… we are more then that… much more…
following authority is to follow the previously written script by others…
I will not do that…I would rather fail on my own terms then
succeed on other’s/authority terms…
that is why I am not a fan of programming or genetic DNA or
following authority… my success or failure lies with me…
not the authority…………
I view success far differently then other people…
I have never pursued money… I haven’t pursued titles or fame
or even love… love just sort of found me…….
my success and failure comes from my search for understanding
of the world and of understanding myself… which for Kierkegaard
and Nietzsche and Socrates was the same thing.
I record my findings and I post them here…
and that for me is success… I ask for nothing more…
just let me live long enough to understand who I am and
to understand the problem of existence…
Kropotkin
All I can say is, that I totally accept and agree with most of Your opinions.
K: ok, but why? it is not about who, what, when, where or how, but why?
why do you accept anything I say? I could be completely batshit crazy…
but if you know why you accept my opinions, then it doesn’t matter if I am
batshit crazy…
Kropotkin
Because it sounds like Your ok with them. Apart from Your understandable dissatisfaction with current political affairs, I see you as a pretty functional and satisfied human being. If I didn’t approve you’re ideas., You could accuse me of having unrealistic assessments of You based on misrepresentations.
In particular, it is the problem with authority that concerns you above, and it is particularly to that I am responding to. That rejection of authority, gives rise to going your way as an independent, and I agree with that in today’s political climate.
There is problems with being an independent , as well, only today, someone high up in Trump’s organization, which I believe was a family member, said, that if an election was held today, he would vote independent.
Others say Trump may as well run on his own independent party next time around, if there was a next time, since his own party is so divided about him.
I’m bringing in Trump to square away with your independent stance, on account for your opinion against authority, and that you are warranted to such, in today’s climate.
This is mostly why I said I approve of what I thought of Your position as fitting.
As far as the why under the more general why of the great changes taking place , umderneath personal opinions, that question is not yet readily available, and and they are unfolding under our eyes, as a day to day event, in one of the most important times we ever lived in.
Other then that, I can have no other answers as to the why of having the opinions.you are having. That is for You to examine
as long you don’t start to try to figure out why do I have the opinions about why I am having the opinions about your opinions. That would involve us in an endless chain of why’s.
Besides most of my opinions of Your views are based on an appreciation of common sense and a gut level feeling on where You’re at , politically, in the broadest possible meaning.
My own belief is that 42 is as good an explanation as anyone is ever going to ultimately get for anything, providing an explanation for quantum mechanics implying things like consensual reality. We inhabit and even help create our own “singular-infinity” with the subconscious mind being in connection with the collective unconscious, or dreamer, and the conscious mind applying normalization to the, otherwise, less reliable subconscious mind. Classical logic and physics are rapidly proving to be tautological, implying that the particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics expresses the Two Faces of Janus, or paradox of existence. That makes space-time as much a personal matter as it is an abstract one, and looking up at the stars we can often feel like a small infant looking up at its mother, while looking down from a height we can literally crap our pants.
It is the juxtaposition that matters and that can be considered to express the Two Faces of Janus. Similarly, gravity appears to be magical, while inertia is more real and in-your-face even, but the two can exchange identities. More to the point, gravity and inertia describe all the varieties of motion we are aware of in the world around us, making it just as meaningful to say we can’t imagine a universe without the magical appearing action of gravity. This is what Allan Watts first popularized as “God plays peek-a-boo” where the identity of everything appears to vanish down the nearest convenient rabbit hole or toilet of your personal preference. Gravity simultaneously appears to occupy space and not occupy space, and to pull things towards it and not pull them, as if its identity is somehow spread out like the wave in a particle-wave duality.
The same thing can be seen with the arrow of time, where neither a backwards, random, or utterly fated universe is more than a vaguely conceivable concept, implying that if it were not for the arrow of time, we would see almost nothing happening.
I would agree, but only by the use of the most absolute of principles, which can never be discovered, demonstrably.
Time and space are related such by transfer, and its based on -in-through an approximated gravitational reality, and I think that’s right.
That’s what I thought, before I accidently figured out a way to prove it. Assuming 42 actually is as good an explanation as any other, then its possible to make unique predictions and establish that quantum mechanics rule the universe. For example, one implication is that reality and the dream are indivisible, and that reality and fiction must become indistinguishable at times. Life must have a humorous side that expresses the lowest possible energy state and begs the question as to whether we possess free will or life is fated. I discovered there are any number of ways to prove 42 is as good an explanation as any other, because it is the self-evident truth.
Think of everything as ultimately making no sense whatsoever (the only thing I can know is that I know nothing) and humanity as being unconsciously aware that it ultimately makes no sense, but we pretend it does make sense, because its more useful. This explains the Quantum Observer Effect and local and nonlocal effects as due, in part, to how easy it is for the individual to fool themselves in any specific situation. The more removed the observer, the more their observations should differ a closer observer, because the principle of identity is an infinite regression (explaining the Simultaneity Paradox). That means the repeated patterns over vast scales of fractal geometry reflect how we perceive things as becoming more or less real which is something that can be measured and used to establish that the self-evident truth is paradoxical and metaphorical.
A recent examination of cosmic whirlpools revealed that the Schrodinger equation applies and modern science is beginning to amass evidence for the fractal symmetry that applies to everything, and next generation computers should be able to crunch all the numbers required.
a problem of existence…
we see and have seen injustice, which I have noted is
actually about inequality… justice is about being treated equal
but we have seen, generation after generation after generation,
injustice and inequality… the wealthy and the powerful have
always had the ability to avoid consequences and use their influence
to manipulate situations and events for their benefit…
this injustice, this inequality has been seen before… Kings who
act tyrannically and churches that favor those with wealth
and we have seen events like the Holocaust, all of which are acts
of inequality/injustice…….
we wish we had the power to end or change these acts of inequality/injustice
but we lack the power… we are helpless in the face of tyranny, injustice, inequality…
and so, we create in our helplessness, some means of gaining justice, equality…
we create the notion of gaining justice and inequality in the next life…
heaven is simply a wish fulfillment to end the injustice and inequality we see
in this life… or said another way, we see injustice and we want
some Deus ex Machina to correct the injustice………
I have an idiot boss and I wish I had some means to overcome his
unjust and bonehead actions…… I wish for some means to create
justice and equality, but I can’t… so I hope for some Deus ex Machina
to drop on that idiot’s head… but no… the injustice goes on…
and we see this every day… IQ45 and his tyranny and it is tyranny…
for if a president doesn’t follow the law, disregards the law…
that is tyranny… for IQ45 to claim he is above the law…
and that he cannot be indicted for anything he does including
shooting Comey, is simply wrong and a case of injustice…
and their isn’t anything I can do…the power to change his tyranny
is outside of my control, so I am left with some vague hope of
of outside forces, Deus ex Machina, to right these wrongs…
and so we see the birth of superhero’s… like Superman or Batman
or Spiderman… we see that they fight the wrongs of the day…
but our superhero’s no longer fight political battles or rights the wrongs
of an unjust political system…… no our superhero’s fight some
evil forces trying to destroy the earth or the universe…
so we are left without any means to correct our current unjust
and unequal political system…… we are left hopeless……
so millions don’t bother to vote and millions have simply
vacated the political sphere…… they are more interested
in who wins crappy TV shows like America idol and dancing with
the stars…or watching the idiots Kardashian…… hoping to be like
them, make millions and be famous without any effort or talent or skills……
and we still see injustice and despair and inequality every day in the news
and we know that acts of injustice and inequality happen every single
day to millions and we can’t do anything about… where are the superhero’s that
fight for justice and equality for people who are just trying survive the day…
have we lost our compassion for those who are less fortunate then we are?
have we truly lost the ability to have pity for those less fortunate then us?
or has the capitalistic system so infested us that we can only believe
in “every man for himself”… without concern for our fellow human beings…….
a problem of existence: how can we become human if we cannot
have pity or concern or compassion for those who are less fortunate then us?
or have we passed beyond the point of truly caring for others???
Kropotkin
Fun fact. Hillary Killary is romantically in love with the Leader of the KKK and she calls jews a bunch of k-words.
now before you ban me, let it be known, i did not call jews k-words, i did not kiss the leader of the kkk, that was hillary. i am simply stating the facts.
Fun fact. Trump increased black employment so who’s the racist?
I know most of you liberals are closet racists.
I know you want to vote for hillary because you are a heterosexual male and you love womens. You love strong powerful womens in power. But due to feminism, you, as a male, are persecuted and shamed for your lust, so the only way you can satisfy your urges for strong, womens, of a woman in power, is through the vote.