[b]Jeff VanderMeer
I told him point-blank so there would be no mistake: This person he wanted to know better did not exist; I was who I seemed to be from the outside. That would never change.[/b]
I assign you the task of applying this to yourself.
He was also, according to his file, “a first-rate scientist partial to beer,” the kind of mind Control had seen before. It needed dulling to slow it down or to distance itself from the possibility of despair. Beer versus scientist represented a kind of schism between the banality of speech versus the originality of thought. An ongoing battle.
And [still] too close to call.
I loved him, but I didn’t need him, and I thought that was the way it was supposed to be.
Tell him that. Though it may well be that he feels much the same way about you.
There’s nothing to this world, he said, but what our senses tell us about it, and all I can do is the best I can on that information.
Needless to say that, for all practical purposes, this is rather hard to pin down.
Control thought of the theories as “slow death by,” given the context: Slow death by aliens. Slow death by parallel universe. Slow death by malign unknown time-traveling force. Slow death by invasion from an alternate earth. Slow death by wildly divergent technology or the shadow biosphere or symbiosis or iconography or etymology. Death by this and by that. Death by indifference and inference. His favorite: "Surface-dwelling terrestrial organism, previously unknown.” Hiding where all of these years? In a lake?
Of course that’s off in the future. If we’re lucky.
I didn’t answer her. All I could have said was I don’t know, a sentence that was becoming a kind of witness to our own ignorance or incompetence. Or both.
Depending on, for example, the question.