Female power over men

I resonate with your sentiment, but is there an objective correct way humans ought to be? I “feel” one way, but “reason” the other. Kids today are soft, there is no doubt about that, but how can we be sure that it’s a bad thing? What wisdom can you offer to put that concern to rest?

Oh yes, kids are durable! I don’t heal as quickly as I used to and if one is to be a boy, it’s best to do it while young.

The problem is too many single mothers and not enough chores to do in lieu of video games. Parents are raising kids, not adults, and kids they remain since they’re taught to be a dependent with a sense of entitlement by doting helicopter parents obsessed with safety.

You might like this:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1Y0cuufVGI[/youtube]

I try to be outside in the sun around noontime to soak up the UV and I’ve often wondered about the effects on the eyes. UVA and UVB are antagonists to each other, but UVB is blocked by just about anything, including spectacles, leaving UVA to ravage the eyes potentially causing cataracts (which are more prolific among the blue-eyed of the population). I’m curious if UVB would mediate the UVA effects, but information is lax in light of the sweepingly generalized demonization of the sun altogether. We need sensible sun exposure, but not sure about staring directly into the sun.

I never known an honorable judge. One in my town who seemed like a decent fella was found guilty of planting meth in someone’s car and is currently serving time. Another routinely gets duis. They’re all sock-suckers imo and all they need to do to get elected is cheese-smile, smooze, and win votes from the ignorant masses. I’d hang every one in a heartbeat and give them the same presumption of innocence they gave everyone else. Clean house and start over; let God sort them out.

Recent surveys and events indicate that judicial corruption could be a significant
problem in the United States. This Note builds an economic model of bribery to better
understand the incentives behind this pernicious phenomenon. It then compiles a data set of
discovered incidents of judicial bribery in the United States to test the effectiveness of our anti-
judicial-corruption institutions. This analysis suggests that our institutions are particularly
ineffective at preventing and uncovering judicial bribery in civil disputes and traffic hearings.

yalelawjournal.org/note/cor … -is-hidden

Power almost always corrupts.

Quite a bit of inbreeding too right?

Education might fix that. Islam is the religion of the ignorant, so eliminate the ignorance and Islam peters out.

You don’t agree with this?

I don’t think in such terms as “should”. It surprises me that you do.
I know what I love, and what I loathe.
And I will do everything in my power to destroy what I loathe and cultivate what I love.
To judge less autonomously is not actually existing. Or so goes my philosophy and my life’s path.
Im pretty harsh.

Outdoors activity is crucial, but so are rigorous studies in math, learning the basics of at least 5 languages, later on chemistry and physics, biology, geography, history of all the ages, - the education that I had, nothing less.

Rules are necessary, but they need to be the right rules. Children need to be tested to their limits until they are beyond adolescence, or they become utterly worthless.

:sunglasses:

I won’t argue. Ive said my piece but I am aware that your side of the story has a basis in reality as well.

To me that always sounds like an excuse for not having power.
The lack of power corrupts with absolute certainty.

Yes, both at the top and at the bottom this seems to be a compulsion.

A muslim isn’t typically as ignorant as people who think they can actually change genders, and don’t realize the are merely sterilizing themselves. Anyone who can endure five minutes of The Daily Show is much farther from knowledge than your average muslim.

No, I don’t. I think that a wealth of resources coupled with a small population makes for hardy people, this creates an age of prosperity of a good number of generations, then there are too many people, there is scarcity, ruthless and scheming people come out on top and the rest falls into horrible decay, as they are led to believe they live “good lives” but they have no idea what it means to live. The average tindering city critter has far less joi de vivre than an ant.

A truly good life of wealth and freedom always makes one hardy in one way or another. Freedom is tough on the psyche, perhaps one in ten thousand people these days has an inkling of what freedom or wealth is.

Without resources here isn’t anything to build. The American Age of Prosperity was based on the untapped resources of North America and harsh physical conditions of pioneering, braved by those who can.
Which is part of the reason why Canada, cold and packed with minerals as it is, owns a tremendous future, if it can deal with its current fad.

Malade

The long term future of the West:

You’re saying I should not think in terms of what I should do?

How can we have an idea of right and wrong without feeling like we should do what is right and should not do what is wrong? And how could we destroy what we loathe if we shouldn’t claim what should be done?

On one hand integrity feels like something I should pursue, but on the other it feels like arrogant sin and self-righteous justification to think I’m abstractly better than anyone else. It seems there is no way to win. What do you advise?

Kids should get the education you had? My education was shit; I had to dispense-with and relearn most everything.

How do you know the right rules are right?

I think I misspoke, power reveals the corruption that already existed, so I’m not quite sure how people become corrupt. Will you describe the mechanism by which lack of power corrupts? Maybe that will spark some ideas.

A guy in a small town said, in his defense, “well, back then there was no one who wasn’t family, ya know.” But what’s the excuse of royalty who rule over entire kingdoms?

I see what you’re saying, but is arrogant dismissal of tradition really considered ignorant? Those progressive sorts tends to be quite bright academically, but have the “this time it’s different” philosophy that bites just about everyone in the ass. “We don’t need no stinking traditions and because of technology, this time it’s different!” On the other hand, the dogmatic practitioners of Islam aren’t very educated, but indoctrinated such that they never came to a place where they could claim to have had an objective decision about why they should or shouldn’t adhere to traditions. I think education in philosophy and science could snap a few out of their stupor.

I could handle the pioneering life, but on the other hand, 7 billion slaves are what produce cheap goodies. I can’t imagine an advantage without a disadvantage and I suppose we don’t get to pick our monsters anyway; plus, the grass is always greener on the other side.

Oh hell, castro was gay? :open_mouth:

Nukes?

Right, exactly. Thanks for bringing this topic back to focus.

Haha yes, certainly.

Power over each other, and power over ourselves. First.

Odin.

Great, Im happy you singled out the important points. The ones the ladies are processing in silent gratitude.

Don’t want to get lost in peripheral bantering.

Dipper, you’re missing a lot. For starters, click the image.
Pakistan has nukes. The future of the west is about resources, geography, and will.
And again when I say “it is not A but B”, it is a little surprising to see you say “oh to be clear it is A?”

Maybe Uruz can educate some more, Im out.
Thanks for the chat.

I didn’t single-out anything; all your points were addressed.

And you know this because, from the vantage point of hiding behind them, you were able to peek over their shoulders? :confusion-shrug:

Yes, better to be safe that risk getting lost. :confused:

Hell, I’m ready to learn, but you’re running away.

Which one?

Ok?

You’re hallucinating. If you say A not B, then I ask how do you know. Your reply seems to be “because I said so and I’m going to run away lest you convince me otherwise.”

He’s currently otherwise engaged on his back with the struggling to pour mud out of his boot by searching for instructions on the heel.

Concession accepted.

Geez man, up until this display of pussification I had a lot of respect for you. So much for the royal treatment. :icon-rolleyes:

[i]Brave Sir Robin ran away.
Bravely ran away, away.
When danger rears it’s ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes Brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.

Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat.
Oh bravest of the brave, Sir Robin![/i]

Does anyone else desire to retrieve the once-again prostrate flag in continuance of the crusade for the existence of righteousness? Surely there exists someone on this planet who can argue their own position to a resolution without first retreating to the safety of Ft Dogma and y’all are apt to give me an ego if you continue throwing white flags at me like this.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAFnbkEwqjI[/youtube]

Hahahahaha

Yeah, that.

Naw, I don’t give a fucking fuck.

Yes, you’re undoubtedly the catcher and not the pitcher. Give FC my love :obscene-buttred:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4En2-8IxGw[/youtube]

Freud might have something to say about you at this point, I would wager.

In any case, you have proved yourself to be a subcreature with the soul of a worm. And somehow enjoying that. I suppose wormy things are enjoyable to worms. I wouldn’t know.

Try living sometime, or don’t. I don’t give a fuck either way.

Uruz

Says the most ridiculed wannabe to ever disgrace his intellectual faculties on ILP. I’m still in bewilderment for how you’re able to persistently show yourself, despite all the username swaps in apparent attempts to hide your notoriety: Void_X_Zero → UrGod → Uruz

For months last summer you gallivanted about with Nietzsche in shades until:

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=175509&p=2677758&hilit=sunglasses#p2677758

And the very next day: poof, shady Nietzsche was gone and I was flabbergasted that you’d let the opinion of one bloke influence your identity (especially since I actually liked the pic). See what an impressionable little Urchin you’ve portrayed? There’s your next username after you’ve worn-out the new one. And it’s a nifty double entendre too :wink: Ur welcome.

You should take your vacuous calumny back to your safespace before I start mindlessly dispatching videos of your beloved Brother Nathanael in retort as I forgot he existed until you showed up showcasing your wormy wisdom in contribution of nothing other than being a general source of antagonization to anyone unfortunate enough to wander within your vicinity.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWBUl7oT9sA[/youtube]

It’s funny trying to have a dialogue with URUZ. Whenever you try to talk to him, he gets defensive and blurts out “kek” or some other infantile response. He is incapable of having a thorough discussion, anything resembling intelligence.

This indicates to me that URUZ is not actually producing his own topics. He’s coping them from somebody else, probably one of Jakob or Fixed Cross’s threads or forum. He’s a lackey, a follower, incapable of his own ideas or unique interpretations.

Has he ever had a reasonable dialogue, interesting conversation, with somebody on this forum? No…

kek

Agreed,

Men have ZERO innate value in life. Those with nothing, have nothing to lose. This explains male risk-taking behavior instantly and simply. How can it be simplified further? Therefore, that also implies, that females do have innate value, and the very reason-why women “choose not” (lol yeah right) to “do stupid shit”. Women are protected, from harm, from yourselves.

A male can suicide himself. Society can tolerate this. However society cannot tolerate the suicide and risky behaviors of women, or children (unless they’re boys).

I’m taking this one from the URUZ playbook of philosophical debate.

K-E-K

HAHAHAHA :clap:

It could be a simian mating call involuntarily elicited upon arousal as a response to environmental stimuli or perhaps monthly cycles. Probably best not to repeat it for who knows what might show up with a shiteatin grin in anticipation of a long night.

Uh oh :astonished: Better sleep with your pants on and a good tight belt tonight! :laughing:

I’ve not considered that angle before :-k

Realistically, most dumb shit we do, we survive or we wouldn’t be here. It only takes one man to knock-up many women, so we need that one man to be the best man who survives all the stupid shit. So it seems like it’s a man’s duty to do stupid shit to either: eliminate his faulty genes from the pool by failing to survive or claim his right to mate by surviving the unlikely thing. Most of the time we do survive the stupid shit, so it’s not entirely sacrificing the false positives by virtue of the odds, although some false negatives may slip by. Idk, obviously it works or it wouldn’t exist like it does.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5lLwkkerPc[/youtube]

Marshmallows? Oh, if you guys only knew.
The question ought to sometimes be "To use or not to use ~~ the marshmallows. There IS an art to knowing when to use them.

Come to think of it, you guys are the ones who need to be practicing with the marshmallows once in a while instead of always throwing the rocks or shooting one another down.

BTW, Serendipper, I am in the process of responding to your post, just in case you are in assuming mode again. :mrgreen:

Yes, you busted me, but that’s mighty considerate of you to give me a progress report and I’d like to encourage more of that type of behavior.

Okay, Teach!

If risk avoiding is a girls game, why aren’t any of the supposed men here engaging the difficult point about the risks of pregnancy?
Why then has this thread become strictly about the supposed vices of Uruz?

Hmmm what could it possibly be?

Kek.