More to the point, in living lives that may well be very, very different from your own, how might that feedback be construed as either constructive or destructive?
In either a God or a No God world.
I notice that I don’t get any particularly thoughtful feedback from you.
Perhaps then you should stop reading my posts.
On the other hand, would any feedback suppotive of Communism be construed as thoughful by you?
Yes, you can choose to discuss these things in any way that you wish in your day to day interactions with others. But it would seem [to me] that in a philosophy venue, the gap between what you believe is true and what you able to demonstrate is in fact true about God would involve considerably more scrutiny.
So you’re in a philosophy venue and nobody is able demonstrate the truth about God to you.
But my point is to suggest that narratives relating to God are largely existential contraptions anchored subjectively/subjunctively in dasein.
You tell me: What [u][b]IS[/u][/b] the truth about God?
In fact, nobody has been able to demonstrate the truth of any value judgements to you.
They would first have to note how, with regard to their own conflicting behaviors with others, they not down in the hole that I’m in.
All I can do then is to react to what they tell me. And in the either/or world there are countless things that can in fact be demonstrated to be true for all of us. My “expectations” here are almost always in sync with what is.
Indeed, I eschew a “dismissive” attitude here time and again.