There is a great difference between the two statements “something happened” and “something happened because men made it happen”.
Only a totally worthless fucktard could possibly confuse those two things.
Totally worthless fucktard doesn’t seem like a string of words that would belong in a rational argument or that should be a part of any philosophical discourse.
Any defense of their use would be great to hear.
urwrongx1000
That would depend on what team you were speaking about.
Yes, you are a philosopher. But are you…
- a female firefighter
- a female police officer
- a female warrior fighting overseas
- a female pilot who flies helicopters and planes overseas?
- How about the women who do heavy labor, pushing, pulling carrying on farms?
Tell me, do you consider yourself to be as physically and mentally fit as these women are?
What is the word I am groping for here? Asinine?
URUZ,
.
At first glance, I was going to ask you why it has to be seen in that way ~~ as power over men. But you did use the word responsible and I think that that puts a different slant on things.
There are times when a woman or women must take control of their lives (at all times actually) and must exercise power over men when men use their power to put women down, to try to make them less them they actually are, to hold them back from evolving and coming into their own.
A prime example of that is all of the sexual harassment issues against men that have come to the forefront. I do not necessarily see this as power over men but more to the point about taking back their own power.
But I do see that many, many men like to think of it as power over men albeit there are women, and we are all individuals, who would want to take all of a man’s power away from him. Perhaps there are daddy issues there or perhaps they are not comfortable within their own feminism. Of course, it is not as simple as that.
Feminism did not start out as a way to, strictly speaking, have power over men but to be able to have the same rights and privileges that a man has based on the fact that she is just as human as a man is.
That started with the fight for women to vote. Many men even today are fighting to still uphold/are not capable of letting go of the feminine mystique that women were drowning in, thanks to men and also other women.
How truly free and courageous is your soul?
Many women ALSO look for that kind of a man although I might question why we would NEED someone to be that perfect. What is missing from us that we require such perfection?
What are some of the benefits of development of that consciousness or soul?
Are you saying that only philosophy can offer that? Women and men who do not have the privilege of finding philosophy alluring cannot come to consciousness or soul or enlightenment in other ways?
List of female philosophers:
Aspasia 470-400 BC
Samaria Codwork 1659-1709
CatjarinenTrottee 1677-1749
Lice Frigary
Iris Murdoch 1919-1999
Julia Kimsters
Phillippa FOOT 1920-2010
Susan Drubbing 1885-1943
Baroness Warmock
Christine Dr Pizan 1364-1430
Hipparceha of Maronica 350 BC-280 BC
Judith Judith Butler
Joanna Ones deal Cruz 1651-1695
Catherine Macaulay 1731-1791
Hedwig5 Conrad 1888-1966
Susan Sontag
Susane Katheris 1895-1985
Theanu
Mary Wollsctor h 1789-1797
Hypatis 415 BC
Simone Dr Beauvoir 1o08-1989
Hanna Arendt 1906-1975
Anne Conway 16311679
Emillie dude Chatelet 1706-1749
Hildegard von Bongen 1098-1179
Margaret Cavendish 1623-1673
Simone Well 1909-1943
Edith Stein 1891-1942
Mary Astell 1666-1731
Elizabeth of Palatone 1610-1680
GEM Anscombe 1919-2001
Diatoma of Mantine
Margaret Atjerson
Ayn Rand
Martha Nussbaum
Gerda Warther 1897-1977
Theano
Anna Marie von Schum 16071678
Catharine of Siena 1346-1677
Mary Short on 1863-1930
Sally Hatlanger
Linda Alcoft
Onara O’neil
Lady Mary Shepherd 1777-1847
Susan Hacok
Katharine Gomes
Marie Dr Tourney 1565-1643
Mary Midgley
Patricia Chirchlard
A partial list out of wiki
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EWu-9uYKlw[/youtube]
0:59 a man comes along restrains him and does what 3 of the female officers are physically unable to do, then one of the female officers tells him to get out of the way, as if she is the one keeping him safe.
Obviously those women were not trained properly. Most women require a great deal of extra hand to hand combat training to catch up with the men who have been rough housing with each other since birth.
Fake news
They don’t have the balls to take chances, start swinging, get violent. The guy who ran out to bodyslam the perp didn’t fool around, he just attacked.
It’s why women typically aren’t race car drivers; they can’t take risks. Probably also why women typically don’t reply much on here; they’re scared to lock horns.
The bull dyke cops take risks because they really believe they have five pound Cojones. 
Girls who were tomboys who competed against the boys always fare better as well, but most women really don’t have a large enough physique to hold their own. Female cops should have to meet specific height/weight ratio requirements. Women shorter than 5’8" are going to really struggle to control people who are taller and heavier than them on average. Even a male cop who stands 5’8" would struggle against another 6’2" man who outweighed him by 20+lbs.
It looked like the women in the video were bigger than the scrawny man. You don’t think so?
It’s not the size of the dog in the fight, but the fight in the dog. Women don’t typically have fight inside.
Ha! Both size and fight matter. Now that cannot be true with all the men who are now coming forward to the police about their physically abusive significant female others. In general, most women have never given themselves permission to strike out physically…cuz girls aren’t suppose to act like boys. I think the fight is there, but making the first move is typically not.
so
many
kekz
I have to disagree. I’ve seen too many women trying to ride motorcycles, play sports, drive cars, etc, they just do not take chances. YOU may be different, but most women aren’t like you. Even guys mellow out when their testosterone declines, which is why car insurance premiums decline with age. Not too many women stock traders either and there is certainly no man standing in their way of plunking down some cash and starting trading. They typically don’t have the balls for it.
There are tons of female Harley riders in my Midwest neck of the woods. None who ride crotch rockets though. Sturgis Motorcycle Rallies, Sturgis gatherings everywhere, there are tons of female bikers. There are loads of women in sports. What are you talking about?
uruz
Kekz?
Darling , you must be near my roots minnesnowta
Am I close?
Harley riders do not indicate balls (lack of them if anything or else why the intimidating persona). Most of those women are “property”. Crotch rockets would indicate balls if the woman would ride fast and take risks. Loads of women in sports who do not compete with men because they play like girls. What planet are you from? I’m flabbergasted that you’ve never seen another woman before. I’m guessing you only date men and typically do not get along with women. Am I right? So you really have no sample size. That’s usually the case when women disagree with me about women 
Bullocks! We’re going to have to disagree. Women who own and operate their own Harleys have balls, most of those bikes are heavy beasts that go no fucking around. Those same women would knock you the fuck out. 
Dumb, poor kids ride rice burners. You know squat about women that’s obvious. :-"
While Wolff agreed that women are generally not risk-takers, she said those who want to be racing drivers break the mould. bbc.com/sport/formula1/18332772
In a recent interview Mouton provided a fascinating insight into the physiological difference in performance between genders. She believes the genetic make-up of males is such that are more inclined towards risk, whereas females are naturally more cautious and prefer to build up to speed. racefans.net/2018/01/31/num … aching-f1/
Cortisol and testosterone increase financial risk taking and may destabilize markets nature.com/articles/srep11206
The Presence of an Attractive Woman Elevates Testosterone and Physical Risk Taking in Young Men pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a778/1 … 5b4693.pdf
Testosterone is positively associated with risk taking in the Iowa Gambling Task s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.d … ted_wi.pdf
I could go on and on, but this is an exercise in proving grass is green. You’ll never convince me otherwise because I’ve seen way to much. Women just have no balls. And being a big fatty with 30lb tits doesn’t equate to having balls. Ping me when she rides a wheelie at 150mph while flipping a cop off, then I’ll say she has balls.