Gender Everything

Sure. Welfare is the life of luxury.

If it were luxury, women would never marry in the first place. It’s a backup plan that allows for easy exit.

Some examples of female natural privilege:

inquisitr.com/1817950/ancie … n-siberia/

sciencealert.com/pregnant-m … ia-bologna

While men are free to pursue and satisfy their sex drives, the females take on themselves all the risk and burden. The man, in turn, can offset the risk by just taking many/multiple women, which they historically have had done.

It is no wonder that Silphium was worth its weight in gold and harvested to extinction.

Nothing in your post disproves female-privilege. You should use better, and more modern examples, to demonstrate how men are “more privileged” than any woman. Of course, you will avoid the percentage of men incarcerated in prison, the percentage of men on frontlines in wars, the fact that males die sooner than females, etc.

Do you have anything at all?

Does not disprove? How is being used as sexual and reproductive chattel, and then possibly dying from from complications in pregnancy or child birth a proof of privilege, in your view? It’s not women’s fault that men need to pick fights and suffer for it.
Then you ask to give you modern examples while saying

Yes, behold the hard and unfair life a modern man!

The bottom line is that without giving birth, the species stops forever. Women are the ones who give birth.
Men are needed for a few minutes to initiate this necessity, but that’s it. So what else are they good for?

Well the best they can do to be chosen to fulfill their part is to offer a healthy albeit potentially brief contribution, and/or perhaps even assist in the longer term by compensating for the resources that a woman has to sacrifice in order to give birth and bring up a child. The better they can do those 2 things, the more they’ll be chosen to be involved in the whole thing, and if they don’t contribute enough in either or both of those things, they’re literally worthless.

All women are necessary, though given enough women, some not being necessary is allowable.
But most men are not necessary - a much smaller proportion of them are needed to fulfill a potentially minimal contribution, though at least it’s not as small as it could be given that assistance in child rearing has value. Human babies have evolved to be delivered prematurely to allow them more time to adjust to the ex utero world when they would otherwise be in utero.

It’s hard to be necessary, but it’s also hard to be constantly under pressure to prove yourself to those who are necessary, and it’s hard to fail in this regard and be worthless.

Which is privileged?

One cannot be both Privileged and Expendable at the same time.

So everybody seems to know which gender is truly privileged, and which is expendable.

Urwrong wrote:

Sounds like you have a bad case of …

As there is the concept of female penis envy, there is also Womb Envy, which denotes the anxiety that many men may feel caused by envy of the biological functions of the female sex (pregnancy, parturition, breast feeding). Wiki

For me those are images of humans smiling in hell. A cold, empty, loveless, mechanized, solipsistic, highly controlled hell.

This is not me agreeing with some idea about men being more victimized currently than women. I am reacting to those photos outside debates around that issue. Those men may be too stupid to realize it or so mechanized and simple not to be able to feel it, but ugh, that is hardly life.

Ignorance is bliss!

“Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.” - Ernest Hemingway

I want to fuck (beautiful) women, not be a beautiful woman. You’re confused. I’m already happy, as a man, because I have increased my value (from zero) to hero. I’m worth more than an average woman already.

As Silhouette mentioned, when there is an abundance of women, some women become devalued too, in which case men can overtake them in terms of general worth/value/power.

For example, many western women, who have bought into the lies of feminism, age 35-50, childless, fruitless, quickly become desperate and time runs out to reproduce, and they realize they must compete with the much more attractive and younger, fresher, 20 year old women. Average men are repulsed by desperate women, just as average women are repulsed by desperate men. Older men are much less desperate than younger men. Older women are much more desperate than younger women.

Again, gender is not equal. No double-standard. Different measures (of value) applied to each, according to sex.

LOL, the above reminds of the movie Parenthood.

youtu.be/yV9er3DfMUI

Great movie, same applies to women.

Urwrongx1000 wrote:

If

how do you explain

Urwrongx1000 wrote

I missed this!

This is so wrong.

Older men make fools of themselves chasing younger women. Although this has less to do with sex and everything to do with their fear of ageing. The old guy in the latest sports car, top down, cruising the highway, hair slick (if he has any) validates his power of youthful appeal that he is still hot. :mrgreen: oblivious to the fact the he is 'Dad" in the young girl’s eyes.

Easily. Because men and women are held to different standards of what it means to be a “deadbeat” father or mother.

No, it’s not. Testosterone decreases with age. Older males have experience with women, and less need for immediate satisfaction. Young males are inexperienced, and will do anything to “lose their virginity”. Thus, young men are many times more desperate for sex than older men. Older women are more desperate, because younger women get all the attention and focus. A woman over 35 is basically ignored by 99% of men. You’re out of the sexual market.

I did say “this has less to do with sex and everything to do with their fear of ageing”.

There is an aching discomfort emerging within that occurs in many middle-aged men… I’m not so sure I want to get old… which dictates their behaviour, more than the hunt for sexual gratification. It is the fear and recognition of the fragility of life and it is not exclusively male, women are also victims. I think women tend to cope better on their own than men. A man is more likely to seek out a woman to “take care of him in his old age” than a woman would.

URWrong and Smears are like polar opposites: one objectifies women as virtuous madonnas and the other objectifies women as whores. A person is not even there except as a fetishized sex object.
I’d thought that maybe only gay men would not sexually objectify the woman, but they fetishize a man-made ideal image of a woman. The real woman is not even there, in his mind, only some glorified version of her, again, essentially, a man’s own imagination. I feel that a gay man cannot stand a real woman, like she’s a nonexistent entity, and only becomes “a woman” when she changes into his idealized image. Hair, dress, mannerism, psychology, etc.
I was watching the Assasination of Versace series, and was surprised to see that many older perverted wealthy men mentioned are not even pedophiles, but just gays with younger gay lovers. Maybe a man simply feels the need to sexually objectify… anything. Take the big fuss about the Donatella & Versace dress in the press; is she dominatrix or a sex slave, they speculated? I say, what difference does it make, a woman is still presented as some kind of sex object. First of all, it’s not even original; secondly, whose creation is that? So the basic idea behind it: let us just play on the idea of a woman as sex object and all possible variations of it.

By the way, when I saw Donatella’s recent photo I almost fell off my chair. How did this happen?! This is what happens to a woman who’s obsessed with being fetishized to the point where she no longer sees or remembers her real herself, but exists as a subsequent “creation”, a walking doll in a gay tailor shop. Gay men just seem to do it (objectifying) better than straight men.

And another point. Take trannies who say they genuinely “feel” like a woman inside, they are feminine vulnerable, etc., etc. are they also not internalizing a fetishized version of a woman?
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBUVotiFEK0[/youtube]

google.com/amp/s/nextshark. … agram/amp/

Does this transgender person really knows what it feel like being a woman? Obviously not. He’s acting a role, yes, a pretty one, yes, but still an idealized version of a woman. Perhaps it’s out of jealousy, or some kind of projection, but he’s not a real woman, to me, not even close. If anything he’s a gay man who hates real women. People who buy into this idealized version of a female are also easily duped into believing that this is a real woman, or what a real woman should be like.

Women you are the ones who wear makeup, dress provocatively, act sluttish and flirty, and then you accuse -me- of “fetishizing women”?

This is a classic example of women trying to “think”. You’re thinking absolutely backward. As-if -I- am to blame, responsible for, the habits and actions of women.

Pandora you are completely irrational. You seem to have no conception of “How women are” versus “How I wish them to be”. As long as you continue to straw-man my idealization, then you expose yourself as a fool, because you don’t read, or can’t absorb, what I’m writing. And to repeat the point for the dozenth time, just because I have (high) standards, doesn’t mean that I expect women in general to meet them. They won’t. You can’t. My expectations are higher.

Smears is sexually liberal. I’m sexually conservative.

Pandora, you are sexually liberal, just like Smears. Otherwise you would agree with me.

Most if not all women are sexually liberal…until they want to, or accidentally, have kids. Once pregnancy is a possibility, then the “values” change (to conservatism). Rarely do women stay sexually liberal after having their first child.