It may seem like an “attack on women” but it’s not.
Despite all these negatives represented by women, isn’t it a product of misogyny and “hating women”? The answer is No. Because in spite of female-privilege, men are driven by testosterone and sexual impulses. Women are beautiful, pretty, attractive, and sexual. Men will keep coming back to women, for this cause/reason. So all is forgiven, in a way, through Sex. All is forgotten about. Any past failures of women, despite all the imbalances and inequality, men don’t really care when it comes to sexual desire. Males have a focal, one-directional sense of desire. Men work in packs, or can hunt alone, to catch a prey animal, kill it, and then eat its protein. The same ‘hunting’ instinct is used against females when male testosterone spikes. Thus ‘hunting’ applies to both males grouping and catching prey animals, or pursuing women sexually.
Women have an instinct, developed over millenniums now, to become as attractive, appealing, and non-threatening to men, to facilitate their sexual advantages. Along with this, it ensures female-privilege continues. Thus things did not come to as they are now randomly, or “by chance”. It is not chance, but rather, the daily actions of men and women which shaped, and continue to shape, these dynamics. Females still rely on sex, for power and dominion, and “that’s enough” for them. Feminism has convinced many modern women that they need to “be more than” their sexuality. But women have failed in this regard. Women have done relatively little, or completely nothing, for Science, Religion, and Philosophy that any other man could not have done instead.
This argument is quite simple. For any great accomplishment that a woman has ever done, in history, if a man could not have done it is as well, then that accomplishment cannot be had by “women in general”. In other words, what great task can a woman do, that a man cannot? This should be a simple question. But actually, it undermines all Modern feminism. It destroys feminism. Because it reduces, and returns, the female-nature back into itself. What can women do, that men cannot? Cook? Clean? Wipe a baby’s ass? Men can do all these, and arguably, do it better than women anyway. Thus it can never be had, and it is a futile enterprise, to claim that men and women would be “equal” based on merits and performances. Men and women are not equal on merit, not on action, not on accomplishments.
The female value does revolve around sex, and having children, to reproduce the specie. That is the “engine” that women control, the engine of life. That is the source of female-privilege anyway. That is the reason why, the cause, that men protect women, that there is warfare, that there is science, religion, and philosophy, everything.