You have a perverse notion of “control”. As-if my desire was capable of “controlling” women. You either have a promiscuous history, or you don’t. A woman’s past is not controllable. I can’t undo the past. So the idea that I mean to “control” a woman, is based on a fear that you are projecting. Maybe it applies to you and your current relationship. But it has nothing to do with me.
Your pity is misguided though, as-if I were seeking your approval. I’m not. I don’t really care about your opinion, when your opinion is so emotional and unreasonable. Your fallacies and errors have piled up. Why would I care about what an emotional, irrational woman, such as yourself, has to say? I mean, you’ve talked at length about Islam/Muslims, as-if it were in anyway comparable to this thread or my personal preferences. Big fallacy. Other than that, you’ve tried your best to undercut and ad hom me. But it doesn’t work.
You don’t really have any reasonable counter-arguments. To repeat my point from earlier, obviously, a woman such as yourself isn’t going to defend the virtue of chastity and prudence, when you-yourself cannot back it with history or valuation. Which women value their own virginity? Few, or none at all? Because females find a great power in sexual proclivity and tempting/luring men with the promise of sex. So obviously chastity is not something that you value, much, if anything at all?
It’s obvious.
That was Serendipper’s point. But it seems Chivalry is lost upon you, as it is lost upon other Feminists.
You see, Chivalry only makes sense when the “female privilege” is obvious. Yes, women are privileged, and arguably, should be so. That you have ignored this point the entire way, demonstrates that you cannot stay on topic, if at all.
Sex can be good whether it’s sloppy-tenths, sloppy-seconds, or first dibs. The point is about pride. But that has gone over your head, quite clearly, yes?