The Failure And Disaster Of Multicultural-Multiracialism

Mr_J · March 7, 2018, 4:52pm

Peter Kropotkin:

after some thought, I can come to some conclusions…

you have feelings of persecution, of being the target of
some sort of anti-white genocide, you have conspiracies
and they are all true, for you… regardless of the evidence against them…

you are by definition, insane… anyone who thinks they are
personally, the target of persecution and genocide is for a lack of better word…
insane…

now what I am interested in is, how you became insane, where you raised to be insane or
did you come to it naturally?

I know I can never convince someone who is insane, that they are not insane…
insanity doesn’t work that way…but I am interested in the mechanism
that drove you insane…so Mr. Zero… what sent you off the deep end?
parents? a job? a girl or boy, for that matter, you didn’t get enough attention
when you were a child? what did it for you?

inquiring minds want to know…

Kropotkin

Mr_J · March 7, 2018, 4:53pm

Peter Kropotkin:

after reading some articles about conspiracy theorists…
I feel I may have done you some injustice…
there might be several reasons why you turned to
conspiracy theories…

one suggestion is you suffered some sort of loss…
a loss that deeply affected you…and you turned to conspiracy theories
to alievate that loss…

another theory is you want to feel special or like an elite…
everyone who doesn’t hold to your conspiracy theories are
ignorant or sheeple or delusional…this makes you feel special
because you “know” things that they don’t…

to believe that there is a worldwide conspiracy to persecute
and commit genocide on ALL white people from persons, entities,
groups unknown…clearly falls into the class of a persecution
complex but let us take you at your word…

there is some of worldwide attempt to persecute and commit
genocide against all white people…I am really hoping
that the perpetuators of this persecution and genocide
isn’t the old standard of the “jews”… that would be rather
trite… so who else would be able to commit such a world wide act?

the United Nations, but the United Nations was created and organize
by white people… ummm, that doesn’t make much sense…

unless you go with the old standby that white people hate themselves
enough to commit genocide against their race…you would have to
have millions who hate themselves enough to do so… that doesn’t really
make sense… to say that white people are being tricked into this, means
once again, we have some persons or group or entity that is doing the tricking…
and that group is in hiding and invisible…is this group, white or black?
no matter how you think about it, it doesn’t make much sense…
but that is the point of a conspiracy, it isn’t suppose to make sense,
it is illogical… like believing that the earth is only 5000 years old…
every bit of evidence suggest that the earth is 4 billion years old…
to have the earth only 5000 years old is to ignore every single bit of evidence
and pretend that there is another world wide conspiracy to make people think
the earth is 4 billion years old…that is the problem with conspiracies…
eventually, you need a world wide conspiracy to make it work… and a monolithic
world wide conspiracy theory has so many problems to work out… like
how does the conspiracy maintain itself generation after generation?
what would be the point of such a theory? Power? there are far better
ways to maintain power in society… money for example… is a far better
way to hold power in society…to hold to such a conspiracy theory is to
hold a theory that is far more complex and unnecessary then is needed…

the payoff of a conspiracy theory doesn’t make the theory worth the effort…
power is never held for long… because those in power die… simple as that…

Hitler’s thousand year Reich lasted 12 years and it was one of the better organized
attempts to power… facts, logic and a understanding of the world makes
believing in conspiracies very hard to do… conspiracies simply cannot hold
for very long… the truth gets out and the simple idea that by nature, the conflicts
of goods that drive society will simply end a conspiracy at some point…one person
or one group wants one thing, and another person or group wants something else.
this conflict is what will end any conspiracy…

no, there is no logical grounds to hold or believe in conspiracies…
they simply fall apart once they are understood as conspiracies…

and we are back to Mr. Zero being insane… ummmm, I will need
further study to get a conclusion…

Kropotkin

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Mr_J · March 9, 2018, 12:32am

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hattDsIFBIs[/youtube]

Jewing intensifies…here Libby Schaaf is kvetching all over the place.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ris22UiqlFs[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJH7Y56c7Y[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 9, 2018, 1:14am

Is employed at Massachusetts College Of Art.

Noel Ignatiev (born 1940) is an American author and historian. He is best known for his work on race and social class and for his call to abolish “whiteness”. Ignatiev is the co-founder and co-editor of the journal Race Traitor and the New Abolitionist Society, a journal that promoted the idea that “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”.

Ignatiev, the son of Jewish immigrants from Russia, was raised in Philadelphia.[4] He attended the University of Pennsylvania but dropped out after three years.

Under the name Noel Ignatin, he joined the Communist Party USA in January 1958, but in August left (along with Theodore W. Allen and Harry Haywood) to help form the Provisional Organizing Committee to Reconstitute the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (POC). He was expelled from the POC in 1966.[5]

Later he became involved in the Students for a Democratic Society. When that organization fractured in the late 1960s, Ignatiev became part of the Third-worldist and Maoist New Communist Movement, forming the group Sojourner Truth Organization in 1970. Unlike other groups in the New Communist Movement, the STO and Ignatiev were also heavily influenced by the ideas of Trinidadian writer C. L. R. James.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Ignatiev

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4axVYZ7NP8[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 9, 2018, 1:26am

Documentary illustrating neo liberal marxism and globalism espoused in America colleges or universities.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU7_Ju5QTyY[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az7VZvLGvcs[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezH1WTb_x6s[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtEXflYl_Lc[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ehumseq10Eo[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjPyLE6YmmI[/youtube]

Gloominary · March 9, 2018, 1:37am

You don’t even need an objective reason (not that there aren’t some) to want to live in a completely/mostly homogenous society made up of your own people.
If you prefer your own people, the way they look, the way they think and feel, that’s reason enough.

Obviously some of the psychological differences between the races are environmental, and some are genetic, it’s a combination, it can’t be all one or the other.
And some cultural and familial differences are so deeply rooted, they might as well be genetic, it’s almost impossible to get rid of them, unless the kid of x race were to lose their parents and be adopted by parents of another race, from a different neighborhood or part of the country, and even then they’d still be exposed to their races culture via the MSM, and probably identify with and gravitate towards some or all of it, because humans naturally tend to be like that, tribal.

I don’t know, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with wanting to preserve, or mix your race, I think it’s up to every individual and society to decide for themselves individually and democratically, but if most people would be happier with less or no immigration, I think it’s wrong for politicians to force mass immigration on them, and of course we know the real reasons why they’re forcing it on us, they’re financial at best, and anti-European sentiment at worst, not humanitarian, the politicians demonstrably don’t give a fuck about humanity, they’re too busy filling their own pockets.

Preferring and wanting to preserve your own race is not hate, so long as it doesn’t lead to violence or abuse of others, otherwise, Israel and Japan, who don’t let in foreigners, except for to visit, are hateful countries.
It’s just a preference, it shouldn’t be tabboo, we need to openly discuss the subjective, and objective issues regarding immigration openly instead of having a chidish complex about it.
And some cultures/races are more compatible with ours than others, obviously.

Gloominary · March 9, 2018, 1:59am

Why would we suppose there’d be thousands of measurable, genetically rooted physiological differences between the races and not a single measurable, genetically rooted neuro-cognitive-psychological difference?
It’s preposterous!
Probably roughly 50% of the neuro-cognitive-psychological differences between the races are genetically based, we already know about 50% of the neuro… differences between individuals are genetically determined thanks to experiments like twin studies, so how could the neuro… differences between races be any/much different?

Mr_J · March 9, 2018, 4:34pm

Gloominary:

You don’t even need an objective reason (not that there aren’t some) to want to live in a completely/mostly homogenous society made up of your own people.
If you prefer your own people, the way they look, the way they think and feel, that’s reason enough.

Obviously some of the psychological differences between the races are environmental, and some are genetic, it’s a combination, it can’t be all one or the other.
And some cultural and familial differences are so deeply rooted, they might as well be genetic, it’s almost impossible to get rid of them, unless the kid of x race were to lose their parents and be adopted by parents of another race, from a different neighborhood or part of the country, and even then they’d still be exposed to their races culture via the MSM, and probably identify with and gravitate towards some or all of it, because humans naturally tend to be like that, tribal.

I don’t know, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with wanting to preserve, or mix your race, I think it’s up to every individual and society to decide for themselves individually and democratically, but if most people would be happier with less or no immigration, I think it’s wrong for politicians to force mass immigration on them, and of course we know the real reasons why they’re forcing it on us, they’re financial at best, and anti-European sentiment at worst, not humanitarian, the politicians demonstrably don’t give a fuck about humanity, they’re too busy filling their own pockets.

Preferring and wanting to preserve your own race is not hate, so long as it doesn’t lead to violence or abuse of others, otherwise, Israel and Japan, who don’t let in foreigners, except for to visit, are hateful countries.
It’s just a preference, it shouldn’t be tabboo, we need to openly discuss the subjective, and objective issues regarding immigration openly instead of having a chidish complex about it.
And some cultures/races are more compatible with ours than others, obviously.

Unless you’re a white ethnic European in which you’re told your reasonings are racist or hateful.

In democratic societies where ethnically white Europeans are on a fast track to becoming minorities there is no political platform to address any of this. Is it any surprise more and more ethnic nationalists reject the very notion of democracy itself?

Mr_J · March 9, 2018, 4:39pm

They’ll never admit publicly there being racial, ethnic, genetic, and cognitive differences because to do so would ruin their narrative of controlled egalitarianism within democratic societies. It would be the death kneel of their controlled system and therefore they will never tolerate or allow such sentiments to become publicized.

Gloominary · March 10, 2018, 12:01am

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

You don’t even need an objective reason (not that there aren’t some) to want to live in a completely/mostly homogenous society made up of your own people.
If you prefer your own people, the way they look, the way they think and feel, that’s reason enough.

Obviously some of the psychological differences between the races are environmental, and some are genetic, it’s a combination, it can’t be all one or the other.
And some cultural and familial differences are so deeply rooted, they might as well be genetic, it’s almost impossible to get rid of them, unless the kid of x race were to lose their parents and be adopted by parents of another race, from a different neighborhood or part of the country, and even then they’d still be exposed to their races culture via the MSM, and probably identify with and gravitate towards some or all of it, because humans naturally tend to be like that, tribal.

I don’t know, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with wanting to preserve, or mix your race, I think it’s up to every individual and society to decide for themselves individually and democratically, but if most people would be happier with less or no immigration, I think it’s wrong for politicians to force mass immigration on them, and of course we know the real reasons why they’re forcing it on us, they’re financial at best, and anti-European sentiment at worst, not humanitarian, the politicians demonstrably don’t give a fuck about humanity, they’re too busy filling their own pockets.

Preferring and wanting to preserve your own race is not hate, so long as it doesn’t lead to violence or abuse of others, otherwise, Israel and Japan, who don’t let in foreigners, except for to visit, are hateful countries.
It’s just a preference, it shouldn’t be tabboo, we need to openly discuss the subjective, and objective issues regarding immigration openly instead of having a chidish complex about it.
And some cultures/races are more compatible with ours than others, obviously.

You don’t even need an objective reason (not that there aren’t some) to want to live in a completely/mostly homogenous society made up of your own people.
If you prefer your own people, the way they look, the way they think and feel, that’s reason enough.

Unless you’re a white ethnic European in which you’re told your reasonings are racist or hateful.

In democratic societies where ethnically white Europeans are on a fast track to becoming minorities there is no political platform to address any of this. Is it any surprise more and more ethnic nationalists reject the very notion of democracy itself?

While that is somewhat understandable, I would prefer my national ecosocialist ideals come to fruition in a democracy, where I have freedom of speech, freedom to own a gun, a right to legal representation and so on, rather than in a dictatorship, if possible.
While we both know these basic rights and freedoms aren’t absolute, particularly when you’re going up against wealthy, powerful corporations or the Crypto-Zionist establishment, as well as leaving a lot to be desired, like the right to a decent standard of living, which should also be in the constitution, at least we have them, and most of the time they work, where as you wouldn’t have them at all in a dictatorship, you would be completely at the mercy of the dictator, the military and the police.
I mean trends come and go in a democracy, again in 1965, we had an immigration policy designed to keep America and Canada majority white, we also had more socialism and a decent living standard.

A dictator almost certainly won’t appear out of nowhere, he will have to have the majority, or at least a significant minority of the people and the army backing him, and so I would rather see that majority or significant minority form new parties and/or pressure existing ones to change.
As things get worse, more terrorist attacks, more economic crashes, worse terror attacks, worse economic crashes, we might see some real change, I mean it’s really sad it has to come to all that, the masses have to be stun with a caddle prod dozens of times before they wake from their hypnotic, bullshit patriotic, consumerist trance, but so be it, it is what it is, we just have to make do.

Gloominary · March 10, 2018, 12:22am

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Why would we suppose there’d be thousands of measurable, genetically rooted physiological differences between the races and not a single measurable, genetically rooted neuro-cognitive-psychological difference?
It’s preposterous!
Probably roughly 50% of the neuro-cognitive-psychological differences between the races are genetically based, we already know about 50% of the neuro… differences between individuals are genetically determined thanks to experiments like twin studies, so how could the neuro… differences between races be any/much different?

They’ll never admit publicly there being racial, ethnic, genetic, and cognitive differences because to do so would ruin their narrative of controlled egalitarianism within democratic societies. It would be the death kneel of their controlled system and therefore they will never tolerate or allow such sentiments to become publicized.

Agreed.

Gloominary · March 10, 2018, 2:04am

There’s no way to know the dictator is good, and most people are pretty selfish, especially power seekers.
They may be so full of shit, so effective at duping people, they may have duped themselves into believing they’re actually good, not knowing they’re bad until after they’ve been in power for a while, and finally have the opportunity to do bad without consequence.
It’s a huge risk to take.
A bad dictator will surround himself with bad men who won’t rebel against him unless he becomes crazy or stupid.

It’s unlikely a dictator will write a constitution, I mean what dictator bothers to write one after he has taken over the army and used it to crush the democracy and override the existing constitution, and even if he does, in all likelihood it’ll be written in such a way so as to make it easy for him at least and his generals to circumvent, altho his minions may be subject to it.

In a democracy, the constitution doesn’t just protect you from the prime minister himself, it also protects you from the military and the police.
In a dictatorship (or a democracy), the military and police are somewhat indepenent of the dictator (or the prime minister).
He can’t micromanage, he has to delegate and delegate, and so even if he’s great, in absence of a (strong) constitution, the military and police will often abuse the people.

A dictatorship is harder to physically rebel against, as the people will in all likelihood, immediately or incrementally be disarmed, and while in a democracy, the prime minister can sometimes dupe the people into thinking their oppressive conditions are what they voted for, by rigging elections, or him claiming: you voted for me because you wanted this, when they really voted for him because they wanted that, at least the people in a democracy have access to education and independent media, even if they often fail to utilize it.

While there probably is some election fraud, I mean who knows, maybe Hillary won and Donald lost, I seriously doubt most people actually voted for a third party like the Greens or Libertarians, or for an independent.
If most people did, I think the press would be hard pressed to trick them into thinking otherwise.
People have family, friends and neighbors, they ask them who they voted for, and if almost everyone was saying Greens, Libertarians and/or independents, quickly it’d become apparent they’ve been had, and a revolution would ensue.
So while voting can be rigged on a small scale, I think there’s a limit to how much, and when the people are really primed for revolution, it can happen at the voting booth.
We might not get everything we want, but at least we should be able to sway things more in our direction: nationalism, socialism, and for me, environmentalism as well.

Mr_J · March 10, 2018, 12:08pm

Francesca? Francesca? The absolute state of modern Italy.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BNP2y7ELus[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 11, 2018, 3:21pm

The absolute state of modern France.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ft3_DOajNY[/youtube]

URUZ · March 12, 2018, 7:49pm

^ kek

Mr_J · March 17, 2018, 3:54pm

WTF Australia? So let me get this straight, in South Africa they’re talking about appropriation of white farmers land by the government without any form of compensation which is clearly racially motivated, which the liberal Australians politically say isn’t a form of racial persecution?

Have you Aussies lost your fucking minds?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B7aMw9qGrA[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dkROxkUoFQ[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs0EI9G7h34[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 17, 2018, 4:10pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plKxWQO4kNY[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 17, 2018, 4:17pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5BJaipjDZA[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 17, 2018, 4:32pm

That’s almost 400 white South African Afrikaaners killed per year folks.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wkGqXxUDQQ[/youtube]

Mr_J · March 17, 2018, 4:43pm

Imagine if you will that you’re a white Afrikaaner family belonging to a small farm in South Africa where as a husband you’re beaten by a mob of Africans forced to watch your wife being gang raped in front of you where your four year old daughter is having her face carved open with a hunting knife also. That’s just one report of the savagery coming out of that nation.

Yet the liberals in the west politically say nothing of these acts that happen frequently where they would rather shove these events under the rug internationally making sure it never reaches the general public.