Dude it was DIRECT fucking response to what your lackey said, sticking solely to his terms, nothing more.
If you want to trump up accusations, drop your stupid tribalism and direct them to the instigator - at least pretend to be objective.
Aside from falling straight into my demolition of him yourself: simply stating that I am saying less than nothing with zero explanation - the fact that you think my actual explanations of my views is “less than nothing” is really quite telling. You’ve really gone downhill, mate. Disrespect.
And this post thus far is also nothing more than a direct response to what YOU have just said to me - if you don’t want me to respond to some off topic baiting, don’t continue it by directing your own off-topic things to me. Stick to leading by example like you did in your next post. We done now? It’s up to you and your partner from here - he has nothing on me anyway so we ought not to expect more of his actual “less than nothing” (as actually explained by me rather than merely stated like by both of you).
Now, “on the fucking topic”, at least by reference to JP, I am honestly not surprised in the least that I’ve not heard him even hint at VO thus far - and claiming he incorporated into his temperament is straight-up Narcissism. I agree with some of what you say about Zizek, and like the term psychoanalyst-analyst. But quite clearly his application to Hollywood fables has worked given his fame exceeding that of Peterson - though I am not sure if JP won’t overtake him seeing as he is riding right on the crest of a wave of fashionable thought whether intentionally or not. Also, JP does the exact same thing to Disney fables and perhaps to as wide a range of film as on which Zizek comments - I don’t remember listening to him extending his commentary to Hollywood just yet but I would be extremely surprised if we wasn’t interested and opinionated on it though - seeing as it would be highly applicable to his line of work. However, perhaps your beef was not in the application to Hollywood, but in the way Zizek does it where JP’s application might be a bit more up your street - assuming his take would be of any interest to you at all.