Called it.
Jesus, man. You want me to write an entire essay explaining every intricate detail and every depth to anything both I and JP say? Even then you’ll probably just skim and meme it with “Fake News” and/or “tl;dr”, claiming it wasn’t worth your time and spewing out more of your “I couldn’t see any coherent point in what you said, therefore there wasn’t one and there never will be or can be” that makes the whole idea of conceding to your impolite requests and elaborating even less appealing than it already is.
I even bet that you’d criticise the exact same method that you’re using if those you’re against used it: “if you don’t reference every single thing you say/can’t find where you heard it/neglected to address some random thing you demanding to be answered, then your ENTIRE argument is invalid, it always will be” and you will just put another brick in the wall that is closing your mind to even a hint of intention to give the benefit of the doubt to those who you have set yourself against and to whom you have claimed perfect knowledge with absolutely zero justification. Interestingly the same standards that you impose on others to justify things you do not apply to yourself!
You’re calling me emotional. In almost every single scenario in my life I show next to zero emotion, but stupidity claiming valuable non-stupidity as stupidity at the risk of convincing the stupid I will not tolerate, and I absolutely will display justifiable emotion. But to you, one display of emotion from someone with whom you disagree is enough to dismiss all their content as indistinguishable from all emotional people who you are against, along with anything at all that you pull out your ass that they did, to which you failed to see any justification (obviously their fault and not your own, to you).
Now to turn some more things back on you:
Show me where I called Trump a racist. If you can’t then that invalidates every single thing you’ve ever said.
Show me everything I’ve ever said about Marxism and everything JP has said about Marxism. If you can’t then that completely invalidates your dismissal that “he still seems to know more than you at least when it comes to Marxism”.
Can’t do it? Guess I won the argument and ILP is full of repulsive losers, especially you, even though I still come here frequently and regularly
You say JP is not an economics professor in backing up your claim that he still knows more about Marxism than me. Is this apology a justification for his failure to address the what Marx is actually all about: economics? He’ll still repeatedly juxtapose Marxism with Post-Modernism without thinking twice but his undeniable prowess in the field of psychology does not excuse this. All I have to do is link the most recent video I watched today to show him doing this: youtube.com/watch?v=JEESNpAu1EU
I’ve heard him do this many times before but I’m not going to pore over every single video I’ve watched, often they are particularly long too, just to feed your own laziness to take responsibility and check out peoples’ arguments yourself. This also applies to what you called “All those terms you throw up” - I am not your errand boy, do some goddamn research and learn something yourself.
Just one more easily located example of him misunderstanding Marxism to its core though: youtube.com/watch?v=rSzpc2vh8Ow
You hear him argue that the essence of Marxism is finding grounds for the oppressed to unite against oppressors, whatever and whoever they are, which I hear is the foundation of what people call “Cultural Marxism”. Marx examined the economic landscape of history (historical materialism) and easily diagnosed two economic classes of people: one who uses money as capital as well as for consumption and the other who only uses it for consumption and must sell their labour to afford it - still valid today. He then extrapolated a pattern through primitive societies through Feudalism into Capitalism and beyond (it was Lenin, Trotsky et al. who came up with concrete plans on how to force this to happen, NOT Marx).
Does it therefore follow that Marx’s intention was merely to formulate whatever identity for an oppressed group to band together against whatever identity of supposed oppressors? Don’t be fucking stupid.
As if Marx was the first person ever to identify that certain people were getting fucked over by others anyway?! And why is it Cultural-MARXISM? Why not Cultural-Christianity? I mean, the supposed existence of Jesus happened nearly 2 millennia before Marx was even born. He was all about the oppressed getting the better over their oppressors. Questions like this make the anti-left sleight-of-hand obvious.
The problem was that Marx made a great point about economics that threatened to expose how certain people were getting a free ride at the expense of others. Naturally he had to be lumped in first with the brutal Authoritarianism of Stalin, Mao et al. and most recently socially retarded SJWs, in order for both to denigrate Marx. And it’s working, because Marx’s points still stand but nobody bothers to look into them anymore because of all the slander, and those that actually do either use it for their own separate agenda or they are lumped in with such people and the scandal continues. The name “Communism” is so obviously derived from an economic structure of communes (communities of cooperating working people, running themselves), and not some top-down dictatorship, which everyone who didn’t actually do their homework thinks it is. Communism-proper is run by the people NOT some singular over-arching leader, by definition.
Why then is JP talking in that video I linked about how Marxists are so arrogant that they want to try out being Stalin because they’d do a better job? Of-fucking-course not! It’s a cooperative self-run thing, read a book.
So I’ve analysed your fallacious style of argument, I’ve linked proof of JP misunderstanding Marxism and lumping it in with the entirely distinct philosophy of Postmodernism, and I’ve explained better than he did about what Marxism actually is - my source is “The German Ideology” by Marx and Engels in case you actually gave a damn about truth, which you obviously don’t. What the fuck more do you want? No real facts? Nothing to back up my claims/assertions? False claims about what JP said? Go blow it out your ass you unthinking parrot.
FC, Teletubbies is over this guy’s head.
I wonder how well he does know me. I wonder how well you know me in order to be the authority on knowing who knows me? I’m not claiming to know him or you, for all I know he’s you on an alt-account with the amount he sucks up to you and how in response you give nothing but affirmation without the slightest hint of criticism that any honest thinker would provide anyone - no matter how much you agree with one another. I remember the days when you used to make an effort to provide extended content instead - maybe you still do, I can’t claim to be looking hard for it ever since it ended up being all the same about VO. The content of “UrGod” is rarely more than a meme or some alt-right youtube comment, and when it is, it’s just drivel - it might as well be his usual vacuous quip but he’s just typed more words to describe the same prescribed meaninglessness without even any logical explanation to any depth whatsoever. Like I said, I don’t know the guy, but I know that what he’s provided so far is consistent trash and I really have no faith that this will change any time soon. Hence my vitriol, my apologies for that to you if not to him.