There are two major points of contention between us so far.
One is over race, the other is over government.
My previous position was Non-Whites can stay, but we’d have next to no immigration, and we’d prioritize White immigration over Non-White immigration.
I admit I was being a little too soft on race.
if the Balkanization of North America we’ve been talking about occurs, I’d commit to a 100% English-White ethno-racial state.
By English I don’t mean racially, but just linguistically, you should speak the language.
However, on the issue of government, I would not join a state that didn’t guarantee me more power over it than I have over Canada now.
Consequently it should be an Aristocracy, with a mix of referendums and representation, where only white men who’re able and willing to fight for it before or during the revolutions occurrence will be extended first class citizenship and the vote.
White men who aren’t able and willing to fight for it before or during the revolutions occurrence (Johnny-come-lately) will be extended second class citizenship and not the vote.
I think you’re being too dismissive of Aristocracy, the three most powerful states in the ancient world: Sparta, Athens and Rome were Aristocracies.
Their governments were more participatory than ours, but more exclusive.
Sparta had a mix of Aristocracy and Monarchy.
Aristocracies are a European tradition, and they have advantages over dictatorship.
One is if a single man is given (nearly) absolute power, his underlings will envy him, and some of them may try to kill him.
Two is hundreds of heads, so long as they’re smart and strong, are better than just one.
Three is if the dictator is assasinated by the enemy, it’ll plunge the state into a chaos it may take decades to recover from, if it ever does, for nearly everything depends on him.
Four is people will be more eager to join if they’re richly rewarded, bit if we’re ultimately all servants or slaves of the dictator, than there’s little incentive, I mean don’t quit your day job.
Five is having a dictator makes everyone else kind of intellectually and spiritually effete.
Aristocracy is part of the reason why 300 Spartans were able to defeat 300 000 Persians at the battle of Thermopylae, the other being Europeans are of course smarter and stronger than Persians, and our (military) tech was superior.
There’s a difference between Aristocracy and Oligarchy, which’s why I’m now using the word Aristocracy.
Oligarchy is practically synonymous with plutocracy, rule by the rich, but Aristocracy is much less about wealth, and much more about merit, and merit will be defined in the constitution.
Speaking of merit, people who’re philosophically educated and trained could be given more power in the aristocracy than people who aren’t.
Also, what to do with religion?
I think Muslims and Jews should be completely banned from the state.
Other religions should keep to themselves, keep their religion private, they shouldn’t be able to build Churches, temples or publically proselytize, or aggressively privately proselytize.
The state should either be officially atheist, or officially a pagan, white spirituality.