Is it collusion or ameliation?
- 1.present political stance between right and left is heading toward more accommodation between parties.
- 2.present political stance between right and left is heading toward decreasing accommodation between political parties.
- 3. The differences between parties has been carefully pre planned as microxosms of larger accessing -succeeding differences of the external (international) and the internal(national) interests , morphing bringing into a utilitarian recognition of drastic widening of intelligence , as an indemnification of splitting between two groups: one having access to information(facts) and those who do not.
There are several talking points on interpreting the political scene in America today. The most incredible happening are two coexisting processes contemporaniously edging toward some kind of clarification.
The first is the idea of collusion and political meaning of primary policy. The battle if the propagandists, reinforcing their hyperbolic characterization of presenting their sense of what political reality consists of
The widening abyss, is getting seripusly dangerous, according to one Harvard analyst, when a news organization supporting the extreme right, declares the Mueller probe as an attempt to undermine the present presidency, calling the situation very near a coup.
The liberal press moves on authority like the above alluded Harvard political scientist , saying that Trump perfectly fits the Mussolini type, if he was in power in a less democratic country, he would be in a position of absolute power by now.
The left sees the attack on the FBI, the Mueller commission as the Justice Dept. as the last bastions of power, whose undermining is the emergence of scary, and the beginning of an era of purges.
The wider question rebounds on the basic perceptive formula of reflection: is. the supposed collusion a refabrication based on periodic functional analysis , in order to project the collusive nature of politics , be it in an effort to normalize some cohesion as business as usual, and failing that to force acceptance of grotesque differences between truthful and faked representations of reality?
Is an internal ameliation to promote an external radicalization worth the diverse guessing game as to what this reality consists of? Is the measure of desperation as high as can be ascribed from re-evocation of misused words of coup and purges? Or even more bizarre, even the Mueller probe heading toward a Warren Commission outcome, coming down to no real conclusion, and implying more lack of clear boundaries then to find anything conclusive?
Is at all possible that this is more theatre to move humongous public opinion to a pre-arranged ameliated , incredibly complex move away from a democratically viewed governance, and the two way prong , the only way to arrive at an internalized , but hidden common international order?
Even if, an absolute concourse of this description may not be nailed down, it may be surprising if, this 3rd way was not incrementally reserved as an option.
If the above shows some significance to members of ILP, then to post a poll three ways,
-
Then is it more likely that political process is heading toward a more factual then fake representation as to the relation of internal and external (ameliated/colluded) consistency?
-
Is it that rather then getting more factual, the process is reversal becoming increasingly fake and extremely risky and politically dangerous levels both nationally and internationally?
-
Or finally, both are planned and used pragmatically to come to terms with changed views and attitudes as response to an inequitable world bereft of rhyme and reason and prone to increased regulation by newly formed pressures of technologically measured consequential regulation ; due to functionally devised, probabilistic outcomes.