Well, to the extent that internet philosophy comes to reflect one or another rendition of Will Durant’s “epistemologists”, certainly.
On the other hand, given the seeming profound limitations embedded in philosophies revolving around the question, “how ought one to live?”, when has it ever not been essentially futile?
Okay, another “general description” of…what exactly? What is the “hope” that we should strive for in an is/ought world that [in my view] revolves around dasein, conflicting goods and political economy? Excellent in regard to what particular contexts we might all be familiar with?
At least insofar as any particular subjective/subjunctive rendition of “this is how we ought to live” is relevant to the behaviors we choose.
But that of course is where the objectivists almost never go.
Really? Cite a couple of posts on this thread that, in your opinion, exemplifies this. From my perspective, he pops up on the thread spouting these obtuse, elliptical “observations” that I myself find particularly difficult to integrate into the world of actual human interactions.
On the other hand, to the best of my knowledge, he chose to create a thread called The Philosophers and put it in the Non-Philosophical Chat forum. Perhaps his whole intent here is just an exercise in irony.