or·i·gin
ˈôrəjən/Submit
noun
1.
the point or place where something begins, arises, or is derived.
“a novel theory about the origin of oil”
synonyms: beginning, start, commencement, origination, genesis, birth, dawning, dawn, emergence, creation, birthplace, cradle;
genesis
noun [ U ] US /ˈdʒen·ə·səs/
the time when something came into existence; the beginning or origin:
the genesis of life on earth
Basically, I see both these words as having the same meaning.
What to you is already a thing? Genesis or origin? Insofar as both can be said to be “events” I suppose one can say that they are things being that they eventually cause the physical to happen.
You mean the concept that the Universe to you has no origin, genesis or beginning?
If it IS hard to attain to, to grasp, then why are you seemingly absolutist about your conclusion?
Do scientists in actuality know enough to be able to say that they know beyond the shadow of a doubt that there is/was no origin or genesis to the Universe[s]? Might this just your subjective thinking, Pedro?
In the conventional picture of the origin of the universe, the Big Bang is the beginning of time. This is one of the greatest mysteries in science, and I’ve spent the last few years trying to work out how to make sense of the moment when, in that picture, the universe emerged from a point of infinite density and temperature—what’s known as the initial singularity. I’m exploring the idea that the singularity was not the beginning of time. In this new view, time didn’t have a beginning, and the Big Bang resulted from a collision of branes, sheetlike spaces that exist within a higher-dimensional reality. These collisions might happen repeatedly, creating an eternal, cyclic universe. We are now close to having the first mathematically and logically complete, consistent description of the passage of a universe through a singularity.
discovermagazine.com/2010/oct/13 … ing-or-end
That being the case, would it not stand to reason that there was some kind of an origin/genesis Somewhere?
True, time and these words are human constructs BUT his hypothesis suggests to me that there had to be a beginning although it suggests to him that there was not. Would we, could we, discount these branes within a higher-dimensional reality, as evidence toward some kind of a genesis?
Of course, I may be completely wrong here.
If there is no time outside of existence, then “what’s it all about Alfie” and what is it, Alfie?
I think that our puny brains as of yet (and perhaps never) do not have the capacity to KNOW either way. But wouldn’t it be nice.