@Zero Sum
Altho the term libertarian socialism is a form of anarchism, that’s not what I meant by it.
By nationalism I meant a nation state with minimal-no immigration, maximum protectionism, maximum political sovereignty and economic self-sufficiency, and minimal-no foreign intervention or aid, or in a word: isolationism.
By libertarian eco-socialism I didn’t mean anarchism, I meant socially libertarian (little-no government interference in the private lives of citizens), as opposed to say socially ‘liberal’ (political correctness, feminism, reverse racism, gun control, government surveillance…), or socially conservative, and economically socialist (government should either partly or wholly nationalize all essential goods and services, such as food and housing, not just healthcare and education, making food and housing cheap, affordable, or it should take food and housing from employers and landlords, and give them to employees and residents, let the people own and manage them, themselves, directly), and environmentally conservationist.
This combination of policies comes closest to how I think society and government should be ran, either this, or a more philosophical form of socialism, based on mitigated asceticism/minimalism.
Ultimately the most realistic form of society and government is the one we have.
Anarchism/egoism, absolute monarchy and the two systems I’m proposing are about equally unrealistic at this time.
While I think it’s important to have ideals, of course we have to adapt to them to the system we’re in, and we all have different ways of doing that.
Yea small groups can sometimes live more in accordance with their ideals by living off the grid, or even in communities on the grid.
However, when things get significantly worse, as long as they’re not so bad civilization completely collapses, the opportunity to reform and revolutionize things, or just live off the grid, will increase.