European Politics

Big News today.

Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (Netherlands), ex NATO Secretary General of NATO, has come forth in an interview saying that the organization made a mistake by offering membership to Ukraine and Georgia.

jmilikowski.wixsite.com/europor … r-concedes
(A new blog where Ill be keeping record of news as it unfolds here in old Europa.)

Scheffer now realizes that Putin had reason to resist.
Too late? I think not. I think it’s right in time.

Go on. =D>
Your post might be deleted and you go to jail, but go on.
There is no point to your post.

Let us spice it up a little.
The European Union is one of the greatest ideas in history.
There were two major threats when it was created.

One was uniformity, that kills innovation.
The strength of Europe is the diversity of nations, languages, and cultures.
Of course, American monopoly capitalists do not agree with that, they want a United Europe just like debt-ridden United America. (debt-ridden to them naturally)

The other is a reemerging fourth Reich of Germany.
This was achieved by forcing the Euro into countries with a weak economy such as Greece and southern Europe.

Two above reasons corrupted European Union leadership, and are tearing the political system to pieces.
Without Britan and Russia, there is NO Europen Union. (period)

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

A re emergence of Europe through the union may be a sign of revitalization of imperium , including its derivative: the Holy and the pre-Christian Roman Empire. That its probably a sure thing, may not diminish by the exclusion of Britain o r Russia because these countries have always had a non continental and self serving based nationhood of preclusion about them.


The new Jihadi EU in less than another 10 years.

You can read into this as well, as another resurgence of the Ottoman effort to reassert dominance over the continent.But is this really plausible in light of Europe’s obvious tolerance?

It is happening due to Europe’s tolerance, Europe’s downfall. Kiss Europe goodbye, their backbone, their pride is dead and buried under new Islam mosques.

Its very sad. But France isn’t all of Europe. They’re pretty antisemite in general and so is England. Natural habitats for muslims in that sense.

It is of course the death of god that makes people all tolerant and weak in the knees.

Wait, Poland is standing strong or was, even with EU sanctions they said the sanctions were better for them than the immigrants. Is Austria rising up against the Muslim horde too? The Poles are strong in the Christian faith which may back the force of their contention with Islam. Countries that have lost their faith have no unified front.

Yep.

Hungary, Austria, Poland.

And don’t think Serbs are inclined to suffer anymore losses on islamic account.

We need Mother Russia.
And we have her. She is Europes leading country now.
She needs to Coe to terms with Poland and the Baltic states.
That is her part to play now.

Parts of Russia are infiltrated by Muslim hordes too, in the south.

This is why the first thing Putin did when he was sworn in was fly south and hand his elite soldiers specially engraved daggers.

More exhaustive is the idea which emerged during the Reagan years, that the present political dynamic resembles a conflict civilizations, and that the older fissures are reappearing. The Ottoman disintegration was a prelude to the first world war, but Ottoman domination had no memory loss, and neither had others with the Serbians, the Croats.

What then, if any, conclusions can be drawn of Europe’s casual attitude toward Muslim immigration? Perhaps they realize the extent of determination on account of the civilizations discontent, to realize the uselessness of severe immigration policies. There may be other considerations of policy decisions relating to Middle East posturing, vis a vis. the Middle East, relating to Europe’s view toward approaches toward the Middle East problem, between the Peace Settlement.

The Ottomans desperately wanted to conquer Europe, and all muslims I know and I know a lot of them think Sharia is the way to go. I recommend looking at historical precedent and simple evidence. There is something that needs to be done.

There is no intellectual or moral justification to surrendering our future to a “culture” that only allows one book.

Not exactly European politics, but…damn!
google.com/amp/s/www.washin … story.html

Wow, this post picked up, and went off the rail.

Might seem unrelated at first but consider the following.
Anthropologists suspect that the rise of Homo sapiens above Neanderthals resulted from a more cooperative aptitude.
Sounds too simple of an answer, but why would it have to be any more complicated.
Consider a society that marginalize over fifty percent of the population, for example women.
Compare the economic and social power of such society to one that includes that same fifty percent.
No contest.

Sure, radical Islam took over part of Africa using social unrest and destruction of civil society, but to what end.
Simply put, without oil, the Muslim world would have no more economic influence than Africa.

We mustn’t forget the easy oil has always been in the Muslim heartland … just waiting for humanity’s appetite for oil to emerge. :slight_smile: