Therefore there is nothing to warrant ‘psychic’ episodes about having a car crash, or not. People who claim to have psychic experiences, about intuitions and future events, discount all the times they’re blatantly wrong but focus on the 1 in a million occurrence when they were, arguably, right. They take that one time, out of a million, as “proof” of psychic events, when it’s still unwarranted.
It is an ultimate flaw. Reason is the difference between Man, above animals. If you cannot be reasoned with then you are more akin and alike to an animal than humanity.
Reasonable people are flexible, because all propositions are listened to, before being ruled in or out, as more or less predictable or realistic. First you reason, then you judge. You make judgments, based on reasoning and rationality. You make decisions in life, as such.
I’m not the one making unrealistic claims about psychic experiences. Everything I can claim, I can also attest to and defend fully well.
The thing about reason is that it can, and does, as Philosophy does, take all the “magic and mystery” out of life. Philosophy can reveal everything, uncover everything. It can dispel all falsity, all childish notions, and return every supposition back to reality. This is why I say that any magic and mystery in life, can only come after philosophy and realism is regarded and accepted fully. This is why I mentioned already that rationality has more “magic” than psuedo, childish fantasies of psychic experiences. Rationality is the exception in life, not the norm.
Concerning all the “coincidences” in life, every person alive has limitations to what they know, remember, and observe. Coincidences reinforce those mental limits. What seems coincidental to one, will not to another with more knowledge and awareness, to one with higher consciousness.