Why must god be perfect? All you’ve proved is that you can put up a strawman and knock it down.
You setup impossible conditions, state that god must be subject to those conditions, then claim you’ve proved something.
Who cares what a theist wants? I’m interested in what is, not what other people want.
Then disprove inferior gods. The title is “God is an Impossibility”. You didn’t qualify in the title which gods and it’s false advertising. Prove Brahman does not exist.
Why? Why would a perfect god create imperfect stuff?
So the god that you’re proving nonexistent must be perfect so that other nonexistent gods do not kick his ass?
Oh I see. So the title of the thread should be changed to “A Perfect God is an Impossibility, But All Other Gods May Be possible.” Wherein you define perfection as impossible, stuff god in the condition, and claim you’ve proved something useful.
I want to know if you have ever admitted you’re wrong about anything? Or are you absolutely perfect?
You’re a good example of how smart people are able to defend bad ideas scottberkun.com/essays/40-why-sm … bad-ideas/
The thing is, though, that I measure intelligence by one’s propensity to be wrong, because in order to be right, you must first be willing to be wrong and accept correction. If you can’t be wrong, you can never be right… it’s like a blockage that prevents further progress.
You’re running around frantically searching for ways to salvage this failing “proof” of yours because you bought it before you took it for a test drive complete with thorough inspection or else you could have easily admitted its flaws. Nobody wants to admit they bought a lemon, but I suggest you start making lemonade because this proof has soured.