What kind of nonsense is that?
Where is the ‘reality’ that is embedded in a stone [object]?
The point is this;
-truth = facts = real = reality.
What is real must be verifiable and justifiable [rationally].
Truth per se is a statement of facts which must be verified and justified rationally/philosophically.
‘That apple on the table is green’ is true when such a statement of fact is verified and justified rationally with empirical evidences and proofs.
Why we need philosophical rational justifications is because on further philosophical deliberation ‘perhaps there is no apple at all’ note Russell,
Such questions are bewildering, and it is difficult to know that even the strangest hypotheses may not be true.
Thus our familiar table, which has roused but the slightest thoughts in us hitherto, has become a problem full of surprising possibilities.
The one thing we know about it is that it is not what it seems. Beyond this modest result, so far, we have the most complete liberty of conjecture.
Leibniz tells us it is a community of souls:
Berkeley tells us it is an idea in the mind of God;
sober science, scarcely less wonderful, tells us it is a vast collection of electric charges in violent motion.Among these surprising possibilities, doubt suggests that perhaps there is no table at all.
Even with a sound basis of “truth = fact = real = reality” one should be humbled enough [because truth is human-made] there is no absolute certainty of what we declare as the highest ‘truth’ which from another perspective could be at best ‘polished conjecture’ [Popper].