Fixed Cross wrote:First of all, thankfully we now have Trump, who as the first modern politician has come from a background of Meritocracy rather than crime and is simply not tied to Marxist deathlogics that prevent someone like the reasonably gifted Silhouette from owning up to his mistakes so as to prepare for the art of thinking. Socialism, Marxism, depravity in general is marked by the structural lack of accountability/self(-knowing).
Silhouette wrote:Fixed Cross wrote:First of all, thankfully we now have Trump, who as the first modern politician has come from a background of Meritocracy rather than crime and is simply not tied to Marxist deathlogics that prevent someone like the reasonably gifted Silhouette from owning up to his mistakes so as to prepare for the art of thinking. Socialism, Marxism, depravity in general is marked by the structural lack of accountability/self(-knowing).
What a complimentary way to call me a non-thinkerDamning with faint praise at all?
![]()
What intrigues me is the way that a well functioning team can far outperform a collection of individuals each pursuing their own self-interest. Distribution of labour and co-operative strategies and whatnot: the most successful strategies - businesses aren't even "supposed" to use them beyond a certain level under Capitalism! Cartels and collusion are naughty. Of course Capitalism does not exclude forms of much weaker levels of teamwork, but individualism is the foundation - the ideal. When that ideal is desecrated you get these overpowering "Communist" powers that are taking over the world - how weak those squashed, random-machine-part ex-individuals are!
There is the knowing of oneself as separated from the group, the unknowing of oneself as hiding within a group, and the knowing of more than yourself as empowered by the group. Clearly the second is the weak one, the first much stronger but still it pales in comparison to the third. By all means moving from 2->1 first can enhance one's perspective on moving from 1->3, I recommend an oscillation between 1<->3 once one is free from 2 - that's when one can really test their thinking, once they have moved on from merely preparing for the art of thinking.
Don't be a worm in an irresistible juicy can waiting to be feasted upon into by a bird (2), don't just be a worm who escapes such a doom to come back a stronger worm (1) - become a net of worms and ensnare that lone crow, your would-be prey! (3)
More inspiring words were never spoken....
Joking aside, Collectivism is so damned as weak ideologically, it doesn't even seem to be considered that it is in fact stronger when tested.
What a complimentary way to call me a non-thinkerDamning with faint praise at all?
UrGod wrote:^ Homage to I.L.P.
Fixed Cross wrote:You are eminently proud of not having done the research to back up your claims
Silhouette wrote:UrGod wrote:^ Homage to I.L.P.
Don't you have to say something of worth if you are to justifiably express superiority?
UrGod wrote:Oh, not clear enough for you braindead leftists? Not being forced to think just yet? How about this?
“My problem with communism is the Marxist critique that enables it, specifically the inversion of the Hegelian dialectic which constitutes historical materialism; I reject the typical dialectic as well as its inversion. The inversion was used by Nietzsche to create the historical master-slave struggle, by Marx to create the class struggle, and now by feminists to create the gender struggle. BLM to create the race struggle, etc. (* ie. the patriarchy. And just as Marx produced the concept of false consciousness from the class struggle, feminists believe that the female psyche itself is just a culturally imposed norm that restricts and oppresses them- something to be destroyed. Both are disgusting ideologies. ) In fact, all leftism is a form of this inverted dialectic: and all right politics is a form of the typical Hegelian dialectic.
Marx didn't know what he was creating with his historical materialism, perhaps you can give him a pass on that. But as I said, all leftism, feminism or blm or whatever it is, amounts to a variation of the inverted Hegelian dialectic which historical materialism utilized in the form of a class struggle and Nietzsche first conceived, though not as systematically as Marx, in his genealogy of morality and the master-slave struggle.
Leftism is the inverted dialectic- in its extreme it annihilates all values and culture; Rightism is the typical Hegelian dialectic itself, which in its most extreme form creates the historical absolute from the movement of spirit- ie. fascism. The left enlarges the State's power by subordinating the populace after destroying their identity; then the Right steps in and turns the State into a God. The two constantly feed into one another. Staying in the center of the political axis as the US has done just gives you a virtually apolitical corporate consumer capitalist "culture." ”
-Parodites
UrGod wrote:Oh, not clear enough for you braindead leftists?
UrGod wrote:Oh, not clear enough for you braindead leftists? Not being forced to think just yet? How about this?
“My problem with communism is the Marxist critique that enables it, specifically the inversion of the Hegelian dialectic which constitutes historical materialism; I reject the typical dialectic as well as its inversion. The inversion was used by Nietzsche to create the historical master-slave struggle, by Marx to create the class struggle, and now by feminists to create the gender struggle. BLM to create the race struggle, etc. (* ie. the patriarchy. And just as Marx produced the concept of false consciousness from the class struggle, feminists believe that the female psyche itself is just a culturally imposed norm that restricts and oppresses them- something to be destroyed. Both are disgusting ideologies. ) In fact, all leftism is a form of this inverted dialectic: and all right politics is a form of the typical Hegelian dialectic.
Marx didn't know what he was creating with his historical materialism, perhaps you can give him a pass on that. But as I said, all leftism, feminism or blm or whatever it is, amounts to a variation of the inverted Hegelian dialectic which historical materialism utilized in the form of a class struggle and Nietzsche first conceived, though not as systematically as Marx, in his genealogy of morality and the master-slave struggle.
Leftism is the inverted dialectic- in its extreme it annihilates all values and culture; Rightism is the typical Hegelian dialectic itself, which in its most extreme form creates the historical absolute from the movement of spirit- ie. fascism. The left enlarges the State's power by subordinating the populace after destroying their identity; then the Right steps in and turns the State into a God. The two constantly feed into one another. Staying in the center of the political axis as the US has done just gives you a virtually apolitical corporate consumer capitalist "culture." ”
-Parodites
UrGod wrote:Considering that I’ve already posted the below into this very thread, and you’ve chosen to ignore and respond to none of it...
Meno_ wrote:UrGod wrote:Oh, not clear enough for you braindead leftists? Not being forced to think just yet? How about this?
“My problem with communism is the Marxist critique that enables it, specifically the inversion of the Hegelian dialectic which constitutes historical materialism; I reject the typical dialectic as well as its inversion. The inversion was used by Nietzsche to create the historical master-slave struggle, by Marx to create the class struggle, and now by feminists to create the gender struggle. BLM to create the race struggle, etc. (* ie. the patriarchy. And just as Marx produced the concept of false consciousness from the class struggle, feminists believe that the female psyche itself is just a culturally imposed norm that restricts and oppresses them- something to be destroyed. Both are disgusting ideologies. ) In fact, all leftism is a form of this inverted dialectic: and all right politics is a form of the typical Hegelian dialectic.
Marx didn't know what he was creating with his historical materialism, perhaps you can give him a pass on that. But as I said, all leftism, feminism or blm or whatever it is, amounts to a variation of the inverted Hegelian dialectic which historical materialism utilized in the form of a class struggle and Nietzsche first conceived, though not as systematically as Marx, in his genealogy of morality and the master-slave struggle.
Leftism is the inverted dialectic- in its extreme it annihilates all values and culture; Rightism is the typical Hegelian dialectic itself, which in its most extreme form creates the historical absolute from the movement of spirit- ie. fascism. The left enlarges the State's power by subordinating the populace after destroying their identity; then the Right steps in and turns the State into a God. The two constantly feed into one another. Staying in the center of the political axis as the US has done just gives you a virtually apolitical corporate consumer capitalist "culture." ”
-Parodites
On what basis can You simply reject the Heglelian dialectic, not withstanding its inversion ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users