That is easy. You have fabricated an either/or conceptual utopia where by every iota of matter can be classified into one or the other of your prescribed categories. I’m pretty sure that falls into one or another logic fallacies. And OH, gosh I did it too. So let’s look it up: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
The false dilemma occurs if their is at least one other possibility. And I would claim their is… "WE DON’T “KNOW” (absolutely everything and questionably anything) Which means the notion of an “absolute perfection” can be loosely paraphrased as “the cumulative best GUESS we have”. That sucker ain’t pointing anywhere near “perfection” by these accounts.
I realize if god were perfect, this sort of thinking does follow. What would happen if god isn’t/wasn’t/will-never-be perfect? How does that eliminate said god from being a creator? We humans create shit all the time and man or man that does make us perfect any more then it would make the possibility of a god.
Your argument requires a god to be perfect, my idea of god does not (I would have to presume I know what is absolute, and I honestly can’t intellectually get myself there.) Granted that is not the indoctrinated notion of what religion defines god as. Maybe it is the mechanisms of power and self prescribed authority and theocratic rule that has it wrong.
That entity god is a flipping genius. We humans as a species have never managed any creation that demonstrates such ambiguity. Roughly looking at a really big picture. What we can only imagine as the entire universe was created in such a way to leave that one question floating out there. We were created as a perfection seeking machine. If we can’t find “it” “out there” we make it up. And then if all is going well in god land we “discover” something “new” It’s really been there all along it is nothing new. It is only something new to our awareness. Why didn’t we see it before? The only thing that has changed over time is the population and there are a lot more people that can be aware. New shit is bound to pop up.
My argument can be summarized by two phrases 1) we don’t ‘know’ what we think we do, 2) number one changes.