With predicting the advent of nihilism, Nietzsche was the first to short the stock of humanity. All that followed was people buying into the downtrend, and what we are left with is the total flatline of humanity with the animal values as the highest, infinitely high compared to what we’ve done to our sold out selves.
Now, the smart play is to buy, while it’s cheap.
First one to predict the uptrend was a Nietzschean, Camus.
1936
“And look here how they moo: I am immoralist.
Translation: I need to give myself a morality.
Own up to it, imbecile. Me, too”
VO literally demands Master Morality.
Slaves literally cannot understand VO.
This is totally logically inevitable, as existence itself isn’t slavish, and per VO, moral slaves don’t actually exist.
So all you people who do not grasp what I mean with self-valuing, just assume it’s not meant for you.
VO will still be benefitted from your discussing it, but you yourselves will not. Really, just check your life the past few years. See how it sucked. Or did VO lift you up even despite your disability before it?
A resolution of a question thats been with me, peacefully, since 1999 or so, when I first attained "Satori"a glimpse of the infinite/void.
In fact the insight is equal to that experience, but Ive explained it now in philosophic/potentially scientific terms.
I realized fully that nothingness must imply infinite potential. And then:
Infinite potential equals no-thing, and that for a thing to come about, it must limit the potential that it takes as it ground.
The realization was and is very palpable, and needless to say, liberating. There is no difference between the Void and the Immaculate Light. There is no cosmic womb that is not also a fulness to return to. Ive actually understood that this is necessarily the case.
This also suggests a “hell” for being that, during their incarnation, during their becoming-limited, structurally take away from other beings. When they cease to exist, cease to be limited, they return to the laws of fullness, and they will be carrying the consequences of aggressive diminishment with them, and this will have to be rectified for them to be able to be absorbed into the continuum of infinity. So their souls will be torn apart, basically.
The philosophy of lack, which suggests that to exist one must draw substance away from the world, is a certain ticket to this hell, or grinding pit.
And the world is a grinding pit, a hell for anyone that does not have the quality to express the limitless bounty that the worlds circumference offers at any given moment.
The key to draw from this circumference would simply have to be… “the right quality”. You’ve got to be “good”, in the fullest senses of the word, to draw power directly from the pure reality.
No Jews “wonders” why he fights, ya ignoramus. They fight for the restoration of the Temple.
And this fight is not looking be going to take forever. It’s sort of sped up for them since they took control of their old land.
Inconvenience of inconveniences is that the muslims have built their own temple right on the foundation of the destroyed Jewish temple. I don’t think they ever figured the Jews would make it back.
The fight isn’t eternal, but the lols are infinite. And Palestine crocodile tears can will replenish the Jordan River.
I think he meant “why God and the Devil fight”, not “why the jews [sic] fight”.
I recently saw multiple documentaries come by on my YouTube feed that argue that the Temple was not where that mosque is now, but a small yet significant distance from there.
Well, it could certainly be reasonable to let the Mosque intact, occupying a small but significant space on the Temple Mount, of which the Western Wall is one side. The rest of the mounts floor could host a Jewish temple and a Christian church, like an Abrahamic “Akropolis” of sorts.
For regimes to let this happen without getting all upset about it would make a powerful point on behalf of Islam, that it is indeed a religion of peace. Also of learning: many muslim at this stage seem to be unaware that Jerusalem was a Jewish city long before Islam even existed.
In our age there is nothing higher than the friendship of a philosopher. This is akin to what in more primitive days of the west was the vision of God face to face.
The “vision of god face to face” represents the awakening to the Principe of self-valuing. As I call it. It represents the illumination that tears away all cowardice before truth. (Yes, one can compare this cowardice to cowardice before woman, but not equate it)
A friendship between philosophers requires two such brave perspectives. What can come about from such a friendship, I mean come about in terms of power, is limitless. But of course it can be quite modest as well. In any case it can not be banal or mundane - whatever comes from it is “godly”, i.e. pure and sovereign.
Fuck them college girls like Stafford loans
Here comes trouble, shut the front door
You need to not give a shit a little more
Tomorrow’s not here and yesterday’s gone
It’s half past fuck it with the caps lock on