Q&A

Half-formed posts, inchoate philosophies, and the germs of deep thought.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Re: Q&A

Postby Arcturus Descending » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:33 pm

gib wrote:Paranoia can be contagious, encode. But I've contracted every strain of this bacteria. I'm immune. :lol:


Perhaps *every* could presuppose that there may still be another or others out there lurking in the wings?
You are not immune until you die. lol

Be vigilant but with balance. If you are hyper-vigilant you may experience paranoia around every corner. 8-[
Train your mind to be calm, gib.
:evilfun:
SAPERE AUDE!


If I thought that everything I did was determined by my circumstancse and my psychological condition, I would feel trapped.


What we take ourselves to be doing when we think about what is the case or how we should act is something that cannot be reconciled with a reductive naturalism, for reasons distinct from those that entail the irreducibility of consciousness. It is not merely the subjectivity of thought but its capacity to transcend subjectivity and to discover what is objectively the case that presents a problem....Thought and reasoning are correct or incorrect in virtue of something independent of the thinker's beliefs, and even independent of the community of thinkers to which he belongs.

Thomas Nagel


I learn as I write!
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 14949
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Ecstasy on Earth.

Re: Q&A

Postby gib » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:18 pm

Arcturus Descending wrote:Train your mind to be calm, gib.
:evilfun:


Thanks master Yoda. :mrgreen:
My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

It is impossible for a human being to go through life not thinking irrationally even if they think of themselves as rational
Also just as irrational decisions are not always bad then rational ones are not always good no matter what the intention
- surreptitious75

The rating of rationality can be higher and always is higher than the person trying to be rational. Rationality is less emotional than the person delivering it.
- encode_decode

Is that a demon slug in your stomach or are you just happy to see me?
- Rick Sanchez
User avatar
gib
resident exorcist
 
Posts: 8507
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: lost (don't try to find me)

Re: Q&A

Postby Arcturus Descending » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:26 pm

gib wrote:
Arcturus Descending wrote:Train your mind to be calm, gib.
:evilfun:


Thanks master Yoda. :mrgreen:


Everything I know I have learned from my cat, Yoda. :evilfun:
SAPERE AUDE!


If I thought that everything I did was determined by my circumstancse and my psychological condition, I would feel trapped.


What we take ourselves to be doing when we think about what is the case or how we should act is something that cannot be reconciled with a reductive naturalism, for reasons distinct from those that entail the irreducibility of consciousness. It is not merely the subjectivity of thought but its capacity to transcend subjectivity and to discover what is objectively the case that presents a problem....Thought and reasoning are correct or incorrect in virtue of something independent of the thinker's beliefs, and even independent of the community of thinkers to which he belongs.

Thomas Nagel


I learn as I write!
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 14949
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Ecstasy on Earth.

Re: Q&A

Postby encode_decode » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:55 am

    Arcturus Descending

    And here I was, hoping, praying and further hoping that both yourself and gib would catch the strain I have on offer.

    Arcturus Descending wrote:
    gib wrote:Paranoia can be contagious, encode. But I've contracted every strain of this bacteria. I'm immune. :lol:

    Perhaps *every* could presuppose that there may still be another or others out there lurking in the wings?
    You are not immune until you die. lol

    Perhaps the strain I am offering is not contagious.

    Arcturus Descending wrote:Be vigilant but with balance. If you are hyper-vigilant you may experience paranoia around every corner. 8-[
    Train your mind to be calm, gib.
    :evilfun:

    I took this on board . . . now I am paranoid . . . I am freaked out. I hope you will be OK gib.

    :lol:
      Neosophi | οἶκος | ἀγορά

      It’s not that truth itself is being eroded per se, it’s that fragmental falsification appears to be increasing.
      (Anomaly654 - 2017)

      But the point remains that you can't get at that meaning before grasping the surface meaning
      - which is to say there is always meaning.

      (gib - 2017)

      Mind is an ever changing dimension that is bound to reality, logic and emotion.
      (Myself - 2017)
      User avatar
      encode_decode
      Philosopher
       
      Posts: 1029
      Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:07 pm
      Location: Metaspace

      Re: Q&A

      Postby gib » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:56 pm

      encode_decode wrote:And here I was, hoping, praying and further hoping that both yourself and gib would catch the strain I have on offer.


      Geez, what a tempting offer! :lol:
      My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

      It is impossible for a human being to go through life not thinking irrationally even if they think of themselves as rational
      Also just as irrational decisions are not always bad then rational ones are not always good no matter what the intention
      - surreptitious75

      The rating of rationality can be higher and always is higher than the person trying to be rational. Rationality is less emotional than the person delivering it.
      - encode_decode

      Is that a demon slug in your stomach or are you just happy to see me?
      - Rick Sanchez
      User avatar
      gib
      resident exorcist
       
      Posts: 8507
      Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm
      Location: lost (don't try to find me)

      Re: Q&A

      Postby MagsJ » Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:12 am

      encode_decode wrote:
        MagsJ

        These are good questions. The first question seems to be one that nature says yes to and we often say no to.

        MagsJ wrote:Gib/ED/AD.. does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?

        I have never considered a question like this. I do not have an answer right now, but I will say this, thank you for asking.

        Just from a moments thought, it is quite a stimulating question.

        Thanks.

        MagsJ wrote:Humans limit situations.. not the situation itself, so are we becoming a problem unto ourselves/our growth?
        Well we are definitely becoming a problem unto ourselves and our growth - this I believe can be from both setting limits and not setting limits.

        Not an easy set of criteria to overcome, of which I recognise that I too am a victim of.. victims of an all or nothing mentality, that needs an interim middle-ground found quickly enough to resolve this limitation of situations and therefore growth.. or is that a bad idea, if our fight or flight responses cannot adapt as quickly as our mind?

        image.jpeg
        image.jpeg (112.7 KiB) Viewed 375 times
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:27 am

        Arcturus Descending wrote:MagsJy wrote:
        does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?
        Many things do have strong possibilities. I do not think that they are limitless nevertheless because there are too many inner and outer influences going on around us.
        There is also Reality despite what we might want to believe.
        Also, we are human. It is nice to believe that we are limitless but at the same time we have our limitations.
        It would also greatly depend on the individual and the circumstances and the subject matter.

        I think that we ourselves have to investigate and gauge just how possible something is for us.
        We all have different gifts and talents.
        But we cannot let go too soon or let go too late to discover our answers.

        So, I would have to err on the side of caution and say No. We do not know everything.

        So you equate 'endless possibilities' with 'knowing everything'? Ok.
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:07 am

        gib wrote:
        MagsJ wrote:Gib/ED/AD.. does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?
        Hmm... looks like we three have been branded as the experts in these matters. :lol:

        I don't know how to answer this question. Off the top of my head, I'd say no. Things are limited by the laws of nature. Gasoline has the possibility of becoming fire but not the possibility of becoming medicine (unless there is some kind of chemical process it can go through that I'm not aware of). The laws of nature see to it that this is the case.

        However, I do believe that the singular totality of the universe in its primal state has the potential to be carved up into any possibility you can imagine (or any possibility you can't imagine), much like the number 1 can be carved up into any sum of fractions you like:

        .25 + .25 + .25 + .25
        or
        .1 + .9
        or
        3 - 8 + 6

        ...of all the possibilities, in all the world, you had to choose this one - compelled to, or limited to?

        Less limitations means more compelling experiences, but at what cost.

        MagsJ wrote:Humans limit situations.. not the situation itself, so are we becoming a problem unto ourselves/our growth?
        We only limit situations because we are limited. We cannot choose all possibilities. We are limited to choosing one (or a small set) of possibilities. If we had no limits, things might be different.

        I think cities, and especially large cities, are making us reactive rather than enabled. Modern woes make for modern ills.
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby Arcturus Descending » Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:41 pm

        MagsJ wrote:
        Arcturus Descending wrote:MagsJy wrote:
        does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?
        Many things do have strong possibilities. I do not think that they are limitless nevertheless because there are too many inner and outer influences going on around us.
        There is also Reality despite what we might want to believe.
        Also, we are human. It is nice to believe that we are limitless but at the same time we have our limitations.
        It would also greatly depend on the individual and the circumstances and the subject matter.

        I think that we ourselves have to investigate and gauge just how possible something is for us.
        We all have different gifts and talents.
        But we cannot let go too soon or let go too late to discover our answers.

        So, I would have to err on the side of caution and say No. We do not know everything.



        So you equate 'endless possibilities' with 'knowing everything'? Ok.


        I have no idea how you came to that conclusion from what I wrote. Read it again.
        Had you even read my last line, you would have realized that my answer to your question was a NO.
        SAPERE AUDE!


        If I thought that everything I did was determined by my circumstancse and my psychological condition, I would feel trapped.


        What we take ourselves to be doing when we think about what is the case or how we should act is something that cannot be reconciled with a reductive naturalism, for reasons distinct from those that entail the irreducibility of consciousness. It is not merely the subjectivity of thought but its capacity to transcend subjectivity and to discover what is objectively the case that presents a problem....Thought and reasoning are correct or incorrect in virtue of something independent of the thinker's beliefs, and even independent of the community of thinkers to which he belongs.

        Thomas Nagel


        I learn as I write!
        User avatar
        Arcturus Descending
        Consciousness Seeker
         
        Posts: 14949
        Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm
        Location: Ecstasy on Earth.

        Re: Q&A

        Postby gib » Tue Sep 26, 2017 3:13 pm

        MagsJ wrote:...of all the possibilities, in all the world, you had to choose this one - compelled to, or limited to?

        Less limitations means more compelling experiences, but at what cost.


        I'm not sure what you mean Mags? I don't think anyone chooses to be in the reality we find ourselves in. However, I think the anthropic principle might address what I think you mean. It's like asking: out of all the animals on Earth, why did I become human? Because only humans can ask the question.

        MagsJ wrote:I think cities, and especially large cities, are making us reactive rather than enabled. Modern woes make for modern ills.


        Reactive meaning more limited? Not actually making free choices? In that case, we've got to tough it out. Learn to be okay with the consequences we're trying so desperately to avoid.
        My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

        It is impossible for a human being to go through life not thinking irrationally even if they think of themselves as rational
        Also just as irrational decisions are not always bad then rational ones are not always good no matter what the intention
        - surreptitious75

        The rating of rationality can be higher and always is higher than the person trying to be rational. Rationality is less emotional than the person delivering it.
        - encode_decode

        Is that a demon slug in your stomach or are you just happy to see me?
        - Rick Sanchez
        User avatar
        gib
        resident exorcist
         
        Posts: 8507
        Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm
        Location: lost (don't try to find me)

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:11 pm

        surreptitious75 wrote:
        Mags wrote:
        does that mean everything can have endless possibilities
        Humans limit situations not the situation itself so are we becoming a problem unto ourselves and our growth
        Growth happens slowly over time and if one is truly open then they shall consider every available possibility
        But they will not be endless or infinite ones and even if they were they could not all be experienced anyway

        It is not so much in the experiencing than in the choosing, that I am interested in.. the deciding factors in which way things will go... stressful much! :|
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Sat Sep 30, 2017 2:13 am

        Fixed Cross wrote:
        MagsJ wrote:Gib/ED/AD.. does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?

        Its hard enough to see two different possibilities most of the time.

        It is? I think the difficulty arises in settling on only one of many available choices.. seeing all those choices is the easy part.

        Humans limit situations.. not the situation itself, so are we becoming a problem unto ourselves/our growth?
        We need to exploit more of each others qualities. Humans are severely under-exploited, they are capable of far greater feats than we now expect of ... us, - and I mean as a collective.
        The egos of others prohibits this exploitation of those with an amazing skill set.. nothing brings out the demon in others than being outshined.

        The UN isn't the best we can do, as citizens of the world. For one it dates from a pre internet age. We can have a much better and more layered and interwoven and effective, relevant, and even sort of democratic united front of nationalities if we become a bit more ambitious with the internet. As fragile as all these individual bits are in terms of force, all of them together will make the world more stable. We will slowly be able to afford more truth, and value others more in terms of what we can not do. That is meritocracy, only refined intelligences can endure it - they have their pride in what is smart, they don't care if it is the collective or individual who does it. As long as it benefits most stably and with the greatest plenitude.
        The UN do nothing.

        The most healthy society is one where the greatest diversity of types can act spontaneously, attain its values, and thereby be of value to others so that they can attain theirs. Now, spiritual spontaneity is all but dead. Where it appears it is met with scorn as if it is violence. We can only imagine the ways in which it will try to come back into the game, and anticipate.
        I fear the world will be a disappointing place for years, so best to buckle up and at least try to enjoy the ride. :auto-swerve:
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Sat Sep 30, 2017 2:28 am

        Arcturus Descending wrote:
        MagsJ wrote:
        Arcturus Descending wrote:Many things do have strong possibilities. I do not think that they are limitless nevertheless because there are too many inner and outer influences going on around us.
        There is also Reality despite what we might want to believe.
        Also, we are human. It is nice to believe that we are limitless but at the same time we have our limitations.
        It would also greatly depend on the individual and the circumstances and the subject matter.

        I think that we ourselves have to investigate and gauge just how possible something is for us.
        We all have different gifts and talents.
        But we cannot let go too soon or let go too late to discover our answers.

        So, I would have to err on the side of caution and say No. We do not know everything.
        So you equate 'endless possibilities' with 'knowing everything'? Ok.
        I have no idea how you came to that conclusion from what I wrote. Read it again.
        Had you even read my last line, you would have realized that my answer to your question was a NO.

        I do not need to read anything again.

        My reply was not a criticism, but a verification of your reply..
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby Jakob » Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:48 pm

        MagsJ wrote:
        Fixed Cross wrote:
        MagsJ wrote:Gib/ED/AD.. does that mean everything can have endless possibilities?

        Its hard enough to see two different possibilities most of the time.

        It is? I think the difficulty arises in settling on only one of many available choices.. seeing all those choices is the easy part.

        Maybe men and women differ here. But maybe it just me.
        Where there is a whole wall of seeming options, I see a monolithic forbidding wall, not a lot of bricks.

        Humans are severely under-exploited, they are capable of far greater feats than we now expect of ... us, - and I mean as a collective.
        The egos of others prohibits this exploitation of those with an amazing skill set.. nothing brings out the demon in others than being outshined.

        Dont I know it. Its the main problem for a wholesome guy with respect to women as well - all the sick dudes will gang up to prevent the match. Same with work. But a knowing, mocking smile is usually enough to disperse that whole wall and send them all crying to their mothers laps.

        The UN isn't the best we can do, as citizens of the world. For one it dates from a pre internet age. We can have a much better and more layered and interwoven and effective, relevant, and even sort of democratic united front of nationalities if we become a bit more ambitious with the internet. As fragile as all these individual bits are in terms of force, all of them together will make the world more stable. We will slowly be able to afford more truth, and value others more in terms of what we can not do. That is meritocracy, only refined intelligences can endure it - they have their pride in what is smart, they don't care if it is the collective or individual who does it. As long as it benefits most stably and with the greatest plenitude.
        The UN do nothing.

        Other than running pedophile networks and creating slave-markets the size of nations, not a whole lot, I agree.

        The most healthy society is one where the greatest diversity of types can act spontaneously, attain its values, and thereby be of value to others so that they can attain theirs. Now, spiritual spontaneity is all but dead. Where it appears it is met with scorn as if it is violence. We can only imagine the ways in which it will try to come back into the game, and anticipate.
        I fear the world will be a disappointing place for years, so best to buckle up and at least try to enjoy the ride. :auto-swerve:

        Sort of. Im actually part of the ride. I make it very difficult for stupid people to enjoy their stupidity. I enjoy this role beyond imagining. It is so lovely to see a stupid person writhe in agony when his stupidity becomes evident to him.
        Image
        For behold, all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals
        User avatar
        Jakob
        ILP Legend
         
        Posts: 5715
        Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:23 pm
        Location: look at my suit

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:36 am

        gib wrote:
        MagsJ wrote:...of all the possibilities, in all the world, you had to choose this one - compelled to, or limited to?

        Less limitations means more compelling experiences, but at what cost.
        I'm not sure what you mean Mags? I don't think anyone chooses to be in the reality we find ourselves in. However, I think the anthropic principle might address what I think you mean. It's like asking: out of all the animals on Earth, why did I become human? Because only humans can ask the question.


        MagsJ wrote:I think cities, and especially large cities, are making us reactive rather than enabled. Modern woes make for modern ills.
        Reactive meaning more limited? Not actually making free choices? In that case, we've got to tough it out. Learn to be okay with the consequences we're trying so desperately to avoid.[/quote]
        What if an individual refuses, or simply cannot be, reactive or want to tough it out? I see a few humans as the calm, and the majority as the storm.
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Re: Q&A

        Postby MagsJ » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:55 am

        Jakob wrote:Maybe men and women differ here. But maybe it just me.
        Where there is a whole wall of seeming options, I see a monolithic forbidding wall, not a lot of bricks.

        A nice analogy to describe the dilemma, but I wouldn't know if this was a male/female issue, just from our observations alone.

        Humans are severely under-exploited, they are capable of far greater feats than we now expect of ... us, - and I mean as a collective.
        The egos of others prohibits this exploitation of those with an amazing skill set.. nothing brings out the demon in others than being outshined.
        Dont I know it. Its the main problem for a wholesome guy with respect to women as well - all the sick dudes will gang up to prevent the match. Same with work. But a knowing, mocking smile is usually enough to disperse that whole wall and send them all crying to their mothers laps.[/quote]
        Females prevent matches too, and who needs the woes of the workplace politics to be played out in front of them every day of the week.

        The UN do nothing.
        Other than running pedophile networks and creating slave-markets the size of nations, not a whole lot, I agree.

        Isn't there currently a call to have the UN disbanded? as they are nothing more than a money pit now..

        I fear the world will be a disappointing place for years, so best to buckle up and at least try to enjoy the ride. :auto-swerve:
        Sort of. Im actually part of the ride. I make it very difficult for stupid people to enjoy their stupidity. I enjoy this role beyond imagining. It is so lovely to see a stupid person writhe in agony when his stupidity becomes evident to him.
        :lol:

        i should have said try to enjoy the ride "in the driving seat". I am not averse to dipping my toe into the ocean that is humanity, but the experience has proved worthless, so back to the dipping pool for one. ;)
        Image
        User avatar
        MagsJ
        The Londonist
         
        Posts: 16961
        Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
        Location: London, NC1

        Previous

        Return to The Sandbox



        Who is online

        Users browsing this forum: No registered users