Yes, it is.
All you’re reaffirming now is that you can’t listen. Incomprehensible to you does not impossible to everybody and everything. Computers can calculate what you, or I, cannot. Thus my point stands.
The universe includes all sets, all that is known, all that is unknown.
Good because you don’t have it, petulant child. It is a task to break through your solipsistic, autistic bubble though. I may as well do it, or, reality will pop your bubble for me, either way is fine.
I said that infinity is a process of change, not that change is infinite. This must be another of your reading mistakes.
And what does “in this sense” mean, context is required. You are quoting Russel out of context.
Humans obviously make mistakes in causation. Children, like you, believe Santa Clause is real. Thus they believe, falsely, that receiving presents on Christmas is caused by Santa Clause. That’s irrational, when premises are false. I’ve already covered this on the topic of “external versus internal causes”. You keep skipping over that, because you’re here to argue for the sake of arguing. You’ve already lost the point, long ago.
“I don’t know the God who created humans, therefore, humans are not created by God”.
You’re saying this is retarded.
Good stuff.
You’re the one bringing mysticism into the conversation as a strawman argument and red herring fallacy.
What I mentioned about gods and abrahamism is that most people, humanity, christians, jews, moslems, you, all associate “First Cause”, Causa Sui, to gods, for specific reason and cause. You obviously have no explanations nor deep knowledge about causality. Basically, people seek reasons/causes throughout life. When they/you cannot find them, then people use reasonability and rationality, estimation, guessing, prediction, and even mysticism. Solipsists like you go further.
You believe that “if I cannot know, then nobody must know!” This is flagrantly false and why you need to give up your points.
My argument, in response to you is, provide evidence, or even reasoning, for your hypothetical “uncaused event”. What do you mean, other than randomness, or what you personally cannot comprehend or explain? And just because something appears random to one person, doesn’t make it so to everybody else.
It appears me that not even dead philosophers can help me convince retards.
That’s humorous because your dead philosophers don’t side with you.
You’re routinely misinterpreting what I am saying.
This is why discussing anything with you is futile.For example, I never said that becaues we don’t know something that it must not exist.
I simply said that any word that refers to something we don’t know is meaningless.
There’s a HUGE difference between the two statements.
But you simply don’t understand them.
Another cop-out…
You are posturing.
Your statements are quite simply wrong.
That’s the only thing that matters.
As for who’s more creative, I am pretty sure it’s not you.
You present no discoveries regarding the previously unknown.
You repeat what many other naive people repeat.
If this is what’s left of your arguments and rationality then this exchange must be at an end.
You are quite simply CONFUSED.
you’re a retard
fuckface
You are so stupid
Fuckface
You are quite simply dumb.
THAT is solipsism, fuckface.
I am not against exploring reality, fuckface.
That’s what you’re doing, fuckface.
Fuckface
You ARE the solipsist, fuckface.
I am right, it is at an end.
Throw your tantrum, petulant child. Maybe you’ll learn after you calm down and realize the futility of your ignorance.
On the matter of unknown causes, there doesn’t need to be anything mystical, religious, or abrahamic about it. Science investigates unknown causes all the time. It’s an essential and common function of scientist. That you don’t know this fact either, discredits you even further.
Moron.