[b]Jonathan Safran Foer
Given that eating animals is in absolutely no way necessary for my family — unlike some in the world, we have easy access to a wide variety of other foods — should we eat animals?[/b]
Like there’s only one “right answer” here. Or is he acknowledging that, in fact, there isn’t one?
Everything else happened - why not the things that could have?
Next up: All the things that should have.
Of course, consumers might notice that their chickens don’t taste quite right — how good could a drug-stuffed, disease-ridden, shit-contaminated animal possibly taste? — but the birds will be injected (or otherwise pumped up) with “broths” and salty solutions to give them what we have come to think of as the chicken look, smell, and taste.
Not counting the chicken that I eat of course.
Family are the people who must make you feel ashamed when you are deserving of shame.
Well, mine did try.
Death is the only thing in life that you absolutely have to be aware of as it’s happening.
That reminds me, do people really die in their sleep?
When I got off the plane, after eleven hours of travel and forty years away, the man took my passport and asked me the purpose of my visit, I wrote in my daybook, “To mourn,” and then, “To mourn try to live,” he gave me a look and asked if I would consider that business or pleasure, I wrote, “Neither.” “For how long do you plan to mourn and try to live?” “For as long as I can.” “Are we talking about a weekend or a year?” I didn’t write anything. The man said, "Next.”
There are just some things you can’t pin down.