No viable, post Newtonean rationale has been given for a cyclical universe. So it is not even a theory.
As far as I can tell, we only exist the once. Anyone who really exists is good with that. Eternity is merely our circumference.
I can’t deny Ill be reborn, I don’t know. Il take it, if it is the case, thank you. But cyclical time is a) not argued for and b) does not produce the necessity of repeating identical universes, and c) a perfect equality of these supposed consecutive universes would cancel out any additional existence of the entities in them. Relatively to existence itself we still only exist the once.
History moves in cycles with respect to unchanging laws.
The axis of existence is the will to power. It revolves around this.
This is not a spatial revolving but one of character. The character of being progresses throughout cycles that all relate to the will to power, but can be entirely incompatible with each other.
This is what wormholes really are - absurdity.
Capable never proved anything other than that he is Incapable of learning technical details and what is being said (no doubt due to episodes of uncontrollable ranting). If you think there is a proof somewhere, display it.
And you still can’t figure out what happened to you, largely due to your attempts at placing blame on me.
There is heavy proof that it exists as more than a theory and to deny it is to deny the truth within yourself that you have experienced the same as any other. You can sit there with faulty reasoning; as evidenced; but it does not change the truth.
Why when you should be having that question answered without my outward response. But, for shits and giggles: in the long-term of long-terms of recycled matter and old matter made new and new spirit matter condensed again to physical matter made manifest, we’re carried along the lines of eternities past and future, like leylines and the random factor is sentient, which makes it a very large likelihood that this little story repeats itself, for how rare to our own lifespan compared to the larger scale, still far too often for some things liking. And, the proof is there in the metaconscious mind to support it along with the seemingly inadequate backing of logical thinking as evidenced here by myself. Entirely reasonable.
I just gave you my objection backed up by solid logic and you have nothing to combat it with except ‘ad homs’. Should I report you? It’s a pity that I’m not as petty as others. A petty pity that I feel no pity.
Yes, it does, but I think he was referring to the Quantum Physics probable future worlds said to all simultaneously “exist” merely because amidst the ignorance of the precise present, there is some possibility of each varied future. That is a different kind of thing and ontological nonsense.
No, I am not talking “quantum” anything. In consideration of the infinities involved, there are an infinity of "you"s and "me"s. This is an issue of there being a 3D physical universe that is infinite in all directions.
Imagine that you are inside a block of space. An instrument measures literally every single yoctometer of that space (10^-24) and records it’s values. That would be an extremely large amount of information, but a finite amount.
Then realize that the universe has an infinity of those blocks with varied states. And it also has an infinity of blocks that has the exact same finite state as the one describing you at any one instant in time.
3D infinity is larger than you think.
We have always existed and always will … somewhere in the infinite universe.
QP’s “multiverse” is merely a mind game, nothing real.