Failed Obonko presidency

My bad.

K: This is about as a badly done list as I have ever seen…
it fails even the most basic test… for example…
it says suicide rates have gone up… base on what?
You have to compare and contrast these to make any sense of them…
for example, I can say the suicide rate was higher in bush Jr. years and
you have at least a point of comparison… you can then look up the rate during
the bush years and the Obama years and compare them… that gives you something…
to say something without context or comparison makes the statement meaningless…

45 has an IQ of 12… now that statement needs something to compare it to…
is 12 good? is 12 bad and how does it compare to other presidents? if all the other presidents
have IQ over 120 then 12 is bad, really bad… to make sense of any statement you need
something to compare or contrast or context…

so you say Drug abuse has increase… ok, compared to what? contrast or give that
statement some context… and that leads us to another fallacy…
it was quite common for presidents to proclaim that under their presidency that
home ownership was the highest it has ever been… well and that is a failed
understanding… if you have 100 million people in the country and 50 million own
homes and the population increases to 200 million people, you need homes for those
extra 100 million people, so let us say that 25 million people gets homes, so you have
increase the number of home ownership by 25 million people… more people own homes
then have ever owned homes before and you are right… but you did nothing…
the fact is as the population grows, the sheer number of home owners will grow to
compensate for the growth of the population…in fact given the numbers, you have
actually decreased the rate of home ownership, the percent of people owning homes
has gone down… but the overall numbers has gone up…

and you make silly statements like the quality of life for Americans has gone
down… once again, compared to what? to Africa? to the past numbers?
the Europe? to the Nixon years? the statement is meaningless unless
you actually do some work and make some comparison or some
context to the statement… the Quality of life has gone down for
American’s based on…and here are the numbers to back it up…
or here is the contrast to make sense of this statement…

You say the job market is much tighter… not around here…
every retail place around here is hiring… my store is begging people
to work there…we are so short staffed it isn’t even funny…
so the job market is much tighter compared to…
and the context is…without that the statement “the job
market is much tighter” makes no sense because it isn’t true right here
and right now in my area… I live in the San Francisco bay area…

now the statement “more income equality especially for blacks”
now, is this a good thing or a bad thing and compared to what?
one might make the argument that this is a good thing and one
might make the argument that this is a bad thing… what does
this statement mean? and without context, this statement means nothing…

you state that that Obama had 7 trillion dollars debt… give me some context…
is this a normal thing or is it special or is it because Obama inherited the
worst economic crisis that America has seen since the Great Depression?
I suspect it is because of the worst economic crisis seen since the great
depression… but your statement makes no sense unless it has some context,
some numbers that compare or contrast those numbers to prior presidents…

which leads me to the point… you don’t care about such things…
they aren’t the real point of this exercise which is bashing Obama regardless
of the facts…

you state that people are more divided, racially…
now, the real reason people are divided racially is not because
of Obama… that is like a black family moving into a house
and the neighbors firebomb the house and then blame the
black family for racially dividing the community…
the family did nothing but the neighbors are bigots
and needed an excuse to be bigoted and then blamed
the family for being bigots… Obama is a black man who
lived in the WHITE house and that set off the bigots of America
and then they blamed Obama for them being bigots…
I wouldn’t have been a bigot if you weren’t in the White house…
ummmmmmmmmm…that is the basis of the so called racial
divide of America… the political divide arises from the GOP
selling its soul to corporate America… the GOP has made money its
only purpose, its only goal… being bought and sold as a party
has divided America because some of us actually put country ahead
of party and that has lead to the big political divide between parties…

I could go on but it is enough for you to understand that this “list” has
no real value outside of bashing Obama and by extension, liberals…
because if the list were to be taken seriously it would have included
some contrast, some comparison, some numbers pointing out the difference
between Obama and ?.. but that isn’t the point of the list, now is it?

Kropotkin

:laughing:

Yes, people are obviously racist for pointing out the horrible administration decisions of Obama! Schmucks…

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxT5z3-ezic[/youtube]

XOM created Isis and Trump made Tillerson the sec of state.

Breitbart doesn’t even claim to be telling real news. Its not good to seek out stories that confirm your biases. That’s sort of anti intellectual. When every story from an outlet throughout its entire history has leaned in the same direction politically, then you have to wonder why you’re reading it still.

Name something Breitbart published that wasn’t true. Then name something they published that was true. I’ll do the same for CNN, after you do.
Then we can start to truly speak to one another.

Don’t forget, if you question whether or not obama was born in america or out of the states, that makes you a racist as well.

Why are you insisting that I advocate for CNN? Kind of weird man.

I get the impression that you’re a fan of professional wrestling.

Glad to see you decline. Not at all surprising.

I have never once seen a professional wrestling show.

You cant construct views of your own. You just switch back and fourth with whatever is fashionable, reciting talking points because you want to participate. But you’re stuck at that level, because for you to argue with me, you need me to recite the opposite line. I didn’t advocate for CNN. You just need me to because that’s your straw man.

You’re like the guy who if I say, “trump is dishonest”…instead of addressing that, you’d accuse me of being a Clinton supporter and want to change the subject to that.

You’ve never really been creative in your ability to debate or understand complex problems. You’re a memorizer man. Just learning what one side says so you can argue against a caricature of the other side without ever actually facing the challenge of a line of thinking that doesn’t fit what you already believe.

You going to church every Sunday yet?

Slave.

Yes. You are. And I legitimately feel sorry for you.

I sure hope so. Pond scum probably feels sorry for the fish that are indifferent to it. Each lifeform has its little cloistered world and can’t value beyond those confines. Only seeking truth as such, and will to power, will push you beyond your false reality bubble of delusions and banal vanity. But I’m certainly not holding out hope for you.

Keep toking it up, bruh.

Your mom.

This thread is why I advocate a one party system made up of competent politicians… regardless of their political leanings, but they do what’s best for the country and meet their citizens’ needs.

What’s to stop that one party from being terrible and doing what is worst for the country and their citizens’ needs?

:handgestures-thumbupright:

And that is what is wrong with trying to represent every monkey on the planet by letting them vote.

Void/James… there would be checks and measures in place, and those veering off these, replaced. The political infighting and hindering of policy delivery seems to only hinder progress and line pockets, and the nation suffers.