Philosophy is personal to me cuz I live mine. You don’t get to decide what it means to be drunk when you are inebriated. Buzzed is drunk now, but back in my 20’s that wasn’t the definition of too drunk to drive.
I questioned your ability to be forthright first and you failed my test. If you take responsibility for your decisions why not say what they were and how you’ve learned? Instead you deflect as if I will hide my truth like you.
You lack understanding. Musical ideals and theories can become realized through practice and performance. Ideal becomes real. Nihilistic ideals have no realization. There is no making the “afterlife” real. That is nonsense.
It’s obvious whether we live or die. You’re the one “without an idea” about that. Are you seriously implying to me that you don’t know the difference between life or death?
lol no
Sex feels pleasurable, to fuck a woman, as the instinctive instigation that forces men to chase after women. The results, the aftermath, the responsibility of childbirth and weening, is ingrained in female genetics (XX chromosome pair).
It seems to me that you’re merely complaining about your own life’s lack of meaning, value, and purpose. But as I said elsewhere, your lack of value does not account for others. Being male, you have no choice but to create your own value in life, or don’t. Remain valueless. Males have this “choice”. Females are born with inherent value (manifest as sexual attractiveness). As you admitted already, males are not really sexually attractive. At least, not as women are. It’s categorically different. No “equality” involved.
So it’s okay for you to throw your fallacious judgy labels around, but not to live up to your own high standards? You are morally inferior to your truly.
The universe was in existence for over 13 billion years before we came along so the rules were already long in place. And if you dont like them there is not much
you can do about it. The Second Law Of Thermodynamics isnt going to magically disappear just because you want to live forever. For that is not the way it works
Having just one life should make you appreciate it more not less so stop your moaning and go do something before its too late
There is no reason to be afraid of death once your life ends since you cannot experience death anyway even if you wanted to
Also how do you know that you would have a better life just because you could live for longer or for ever
You could end up living a worse life than the one you have now so be grateful you only have one after all
So, let me get this straight, you believe in the scientific proofs enough to call my beliefs non-realistic based on what science verifies, but not enough to quote what’s verified when asked, when it matters to a discussion? That’s dishonesty there Bub.
What is entirely non realistic is the notion of astral projection which you very clearly believe in and for what there is no scientific evidence at all
What is more realistic is the notion of consciousness surviving in some form after brain death even though science currently has no answer for this
There is no dishonesty here at all Wendy since I will accept anything as being true if there is actual evidence for it regardless of what it actually is
Anecdotal evidence based on testimony is a valid part of the scientific method. There is a great deal of anecdotal evidence regarding astral projection particularly in the cases of near death experiences. You are quite wrong that there is no evidence regarding astral projection and quite dishonest in what you consider valid scientific evidence.
This is completely wrong. In science there is no such thing as anecdotal evidence. Personal testimony that cannot be verified is not scientific
Anything that only happens within the mind cannot be scientifically validated as it cannot be independently observed. So there can never be
evidence for astral projection or any other purely mental experience
That may be so but the personal testimony of those who claim to have had them does not constitute evidence since
it cannot be verified independently. Now science can still investigate it but it just can not establish any conclusions
Yes it can but it is not evidence because it is purely a mental experience
A statistical baseline for it is good but it cannot be regarded as scientific