Are women more benevolent…or more cowardly and hypocritical?
When you’re attacked by a wild animal, or a caught in an accident or natural disaster, common sense will tell you you’re more likely to be saved by a man than a woman, whether it was his job to save people, or whether he went way out of his way to save you.
So if we’re more likely to kill you, we’re more likely to save your life, too.
It’s too bad they don’t keep statistics on who’s more heroic, only who’s more villainous, or if they do, such statistics aren’t well known, perhaps because they don’t fit the feminist narrative.
To reiterate, men are more vital to the economy, not only do they make more money, even thou women spend nearly as much from what I’ve read, and often on more superfluous things, men take on most of the dirty, dangerous jobs women won’t.
They’ve built our civilization from the ground up and maintain it.
Men are our farmers and construction workers, our doctors and paramedics, our policemen, firemen, rescue workers and soldiers.
If women are so benevolent, why don’t they put themselves in harms way to save others?
Does testosterone = malevolence, or is it a tool, like any other, that gives men the capacity to deal with life/death situations for good/ill?
And so what’s the downside of estrogen, how might estrogen manifest in psychopathic and sociopathic women, or bipolar women?
Women are squeamish about blood, but are they squeamish about blood money?
In all seriousness, I think it’d be an interesting study, to see how quickly women will throw themselves at notorious capitalist crime bosses, rich gangsters and thugs over your average honest, hardworking schmo.
Most women don’t have the balls to put their lives in peril for good/ill, but many sure as hell will marry the prick that does.
Of course such a study would be considered outrageously sexist, but science shouldn’t shy away from research merely cause it’s controversial, offensive, isn’t sufficiently PC or politically expedient.
Science ought to be just about the facts, and some facts are moral, and might reflect badly on women.
Perhaps women are even far more amoral/immoral than men, more vain, shallow and materialistic, but at the same time, more cunning, more manipulative, all the while play the role of the victim.
The best kind of power is the kind you don’t even see, that makes you think and feel like you’re powerful, and so when things go awry, you’re more apt to blame yourself rather than the real culprit.
Women are more insidious, their capacity for abuse, and benevolence can’t be so easily be measured in dollars and cents, in lives saved or lost, and since psychology is still a burgeoning field relative to other sciences, and hitherto dominated by men, albeit many with a feminist agenda, it’ll probably take longer for it to uncover the full depths of women’s, depravity…if it ever does.