Very Fake News

Figures, you believe in the goodness of organized religions, its good people and you don’t know your fuckin neighbor who you had the audacity to use as evidence. How very liberal. WTFever.

We have only talked a few times, and the subject of what we do for jobs never came up yet. So what?

I bet you seriously think he is part of some ‘conspiracy’, don’t you? You are a useless fucking piece of shit racist, that is all. Nazi trash. And you still haven’t even responded to my comments about Jewish culture, nor answered my question what percentage of Jewish people you think are “in a conspiracy”. That is because you have no answers or responses, because you have nothing at all but your stupid little conspiracy trolling. You dance at the strings of those you will never even know how to hate, because your hatred has been pointed for you.

And I don’t care about organized religion, since I am not religious, but neither do I demonize it as if it plays no functional role in civilization. There are good and bad aspects of religions, and some religions are better than others. There is no God, but humans use images to focus and define their values. Again, so what?

You’re just a useless troll, trying desperately to cling to your outdated, childish idiocies. I’ve abandoned those long ago. But please, keep entertaining us with your court jester routine. You may have lost everything else, your mind, sanity and pride, but hey it seems you are still good at something.

Now fuck off from my thread.

Power, but at what cost? Jews also inherited many genetic diseases that are found only in Jewish populations. Even intellectual Jews often have psychological issues on the side. Do you also want to pay that price? But maybe we can look at historical consequences. It is said (and someone can correct me) that Jews were not allowed to own or work on host lands (because of religion) so they had to survive by other means, either by providing professional services, trading, and maybe doing things like entertainment as well; and this means of surviving was passed down the generations. It was a choice that was made (to keep religious/ethnic identity) and the followed consequences, such as being detached from home (thus possibly leading to being more open and promoting universal instead of custom values) being mainly cerebral/feminine (possibly from denying violence…and how did that begin, anyway?) and not having a continuous identity attached to the actual historical physical land (that’s bound to alter your perception of identity over time). Their identity as it is now, is only symbolic, because along the way it has changed too much. What exactly are they holding on to now? Amish, I would say, are the same way in clinging to religious/ethnic identity, except that they are attached to their new lands. Jewish identity seems more ephemeral/ideological now. Even the state of Israel is sometimes used in figurative sense.
Anyway, as it is now, I believe that spread of globalization has to be stopped or it will throw the whole world into sepsis. It’s like an inverted exile, or ideological refugee crisis, but in a worldwide scale.

I’m reminded of Twilight Zone episode “16 millimeter shrine”, about a Hollywood star who was stuck in her glorious past and spent her days reliving them…over and over again…until she disappeared into her own fantasy.

The entire history of the Hebrews and offspring is about the man-nipulation of others, stemming literally from the first, “Ahdam”. They foresee their entire purpose as that of governing mankind throughout the world as the only humans of “Man”. The Star of David is entirely about a “holy” means to ensure perfect control of mankind. They do not work the land, as their purpose is to work the life on the land, hence their focus on media, medicine, money, laws, spying, scapegoating, false-flags,… everything have anything to do with manipulating people, creating the “plagues”, the “famines”, and “reigning fire and ice from above.” Those who can destroy you can more easily manipulate you than merely those who help you - serving the Serpent. Entropy is much easier than harmony. Destroying is easier than constructing. Judging and condemning is easier than forgiving and teaching (Judaism vs Christianity).

No!

Your blah, blah, blah routine rants are as lame as fuck! Are you trying to bore me to death? #-o Geez…so sad. :evilfun: :laughing:

I’m going to look into that % number world-wide, if most of the world banks are owned by Jews that will save me a lot of time for those who owe on loans, own nothing until they are paid off.

Interesting but not exactly what I’m looking for, but who owns or runs what is listed. Why don’t you take a good long look.

I know reporters aren’t the brightest but why the numbers are completely different from story to story…who knows? But I’m still digging for the gold. These just give a glimpse into the context of where the power comes from predominantly by country. Many Israel Jews have dual citizenships so some of this is redundant.

Is that a list of lies Void? No it’s genetics, superior Jewish genetics and family upbringing that enables this one Rothschild family to own it all. No, the Rothschild’s cartel (full of Asians, Blacks, and Latinos… :laughing: ) are in no way supported monetarily by the synagogues worldwide to scam their way up to where they are today.

Simply because central banks participate in the BIS does not mean they are “owned by Rothschild”. Who really owns a central bank? Let’s look at the US Federal Reserve as an example. It is owned by its member banks, major and minor banks in the US literally own the federal reserve. This is because during the initial phase of its being set up, capital needed to be raised so stock was issued to existing banks, and is still issued to new banks who want to join. So who owns these major and minor banks? It isn’t “the Jews”, it is ordinary people, American citizens and businessmen.

There was an analysis done of this rumor that the American banks were owned by foreigners, particularly the British. The claim was proven to be false when it was demonstrable that the ownership of the largest banks were almost entirely Americans, not British.

Same with your “Jews” nonsense. Where are “the Jews”, how do “they” own a bank? Banks are owned by whoever owns stock in those banks, since most are publicly traded companies. In turn, these banks own the stock in the federal reserve, which pays them dividends as shareholders.

So again, you seem to have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

You think I will be impressed by a list of central banks in the world? Give me a break. I am aware of how central banks work and the reasons why governments put them in place. I am not a fan of central banking, fractional reserve lending, or fiat currency in its current form, and I could go into great detail to explain why that is, but I won’t because you don’t possess the mental capacity or emotional maturity capable of having such a discussion. You would rather spam lists of banks in the world as if that is an argument, without even explaining what the fuck you mean by “Rothschild owned banks”. Do you even know what you are talking about? Does Rothschild literally own every central bank in the world? How does that work, exactly, when the banks are actually owned by their shareholders (other banks) and those banks are in turn owned by citizens who bought stock in those banks? Lol. You are pathetic.

Do you even know about the BIS, or what it is, or who runs it? No? Yeah, that is what I thought. Again I could argue your own bullshit conspiracy nonsense far better than you can, and even I know it is rubbish. So what does that tell you, hmm?

I can sum up the real reason for all you racist Jew haters and your constant bitching: “Boo hoo, not fair! I wish I had power too!”

Haha.

Yeah, you have no power, but why is that? Stop blaming everyone else for your own failures. You turn the entire world into a paranoid delusional fantasy simply because you do not wish to recognize your own ineptitude in life. How utterly pathetic.

Owning a bank doesn’t even really mean anything.

What is a bank? It’s a place where other people store their wealth for safekeeping. And traditionally people like to put their wealth and savings in the hands with some Jewish banks and peoples (not all banks are jewish although a large percentage, 45% ? maybe), because they can expect to return in the distant future (200 years later), and yes, their wealth is still there, still guarded, still pristine, and the banks will even give them a 3% return bonus if the savings account is large enough.

To claim that “banks run the world” is just straight ignorance. The bankers do not own the assets that they hold for their clients. The clients own them.

That’s like deposting a $1000 check into the bank, and then hating jews because jews stole your money. When you can withdraw it anytime. It’s nonsense. Nobody stole your money. Just take it out of the bank if you’re unhappy with your choice.

Hahahahaha. Yeah, that’s Wendy and Otto ‘logic’ right there for you.

Otto and Wendy, retard couple of the year: “We want to deposit this money into our joint bank account”
Teller: “Ok, here you go. Thank you. And here is your receipt, thank you for your deposit”
Otto and Wendy, retard couple of the year: “You Jew bastard, you stole my money!”

The modern conception is false. Anarchists, Marxists, Nihilists, and Liberals sometimes fall into the same group. It was like a few years back with the “top 1%” protests. These “rebels”, dropouts, punks, and anarchists just want somebody to blame, and so say “banks are bad!” without knowing what a bank is or does. Attacking the banks does nothing. All you’re doing is, really, stealing other people’s money who probably worked their lives, decently and honestly, for that money.

Let’s say somebody, average westerner, works for 20 years at $50,000 per year (being generous). That’s 1 million dollars, before taxes, cars, mortgates, food, etc. So really it’s more like $400,000. An average person saves 401k after a lifetime of blue collar work.

Then a bunch of anarchists say banks are bad, and maybe even rob a bank. Congratulations, you just stole the savings account of some man or woman who worked her ass off, toiled day and night, for that.

Another misconception is “banks own houses”. Not really. If a person, couple, or group take out loans to buy a house, live in that house or flip it, then the bank is responsible for saying yes or no to a line of credit. When people default on their mortgages, it means they lose and the banks lose. Many banks actually lose money on defaults and failed mortgages. It’s easiest and most profitable, for everybody involved, to keep the loan and payments going forward.

That is in part why the big banks got bailed out in 2008 by the federal government. Because the losses were unnecessary, unreasonable, and would cause many other disasters.

Essentially it is a bank’s personal and private fault, blame, for lending out bad loans. Hence this is the “too big to fail” mentality. Some banks did collapse and lose a lot of liquidity though.

Jews aren’t American citizens and businessmen? God you’re stupid!

Hahaha! Is your middle name Naive?

Banks make money off of your assets…duh!

:sunglasses:

They mean well enough, albeit misguided.

Duh!

I can’t find any explanation of what a “thrift” is. Anybody know?

Not necessarily, it depends on the relationship between bank and clients.

Much of the time the interest rates are intended to match inflation rates so neither the bank nor client lose money or wealth over time.

You mean the banks don’t loan your money out to credit card holders who in turn pay interest or use your money to finance Voids trailer home in return for mortgage payments interest?

I’m officially in the fucking twilight zone with dumb mutherfuckers who believe banks don’t make money off of your assets.