Is Donald Trump Dangerous?

^ clownnoob nonsense. You can’t even answer a simple question. Hilarious.

Muh western christianity cuckdom! Please don’t take notice!

Muh still can’t answer a simple question. Ouch.

Just stop, I don’t know much embarrassing yourself I can take. I’m about to piss myself laughing and smiling over here.

Why don’t you have any answers? Just silly redirection and emoticons. Then accuse the other side of what you’re actually guilty of. Typical leftist tactic.

I call you embarrassing and then, predictably, a few posts later you say the same to me.

If you can’t be intelligent, at least try to be original.

Do some (and if yes: how many) of the U.S. citizens hate their country, for example because of the unjustice in the world? Many haters of this kind argue in this way, I think, but I do not know for sure, and that is the reason why I want to ask an U.S. citizen, for example you (or are you not an U.S. citizen?).

I am both, US and Hungarian citizen. Your question, is complex, and needs a lot of thought to give it justice, in a concise form. But shall get back on it.

The question remains: Do some (and if yes: how many) of the U.S. citizens hate their country, for example because of the unjustice in the world?

My assumption is: yes; but I don’t know the percentage. All European countries and the countries with people of European origin have such haters.

I’m not left or right, I am an apolitical egoist that serves themself or those in my inner circle.

(As a tribalist those that are in my tribe and are considered to be a part of it.)

I don’t classify myself in any traditional terminologies politically as I don’t fit any criteria. I am a skeptic of all authority and systems of government but not necessarily opposed to the idea of government or leadership. It’s just that if I’m not leading, directing, or influencing a government organization I have no interest in it as it has no benefit in pertaining to me. I have no interest in government or authority of any kind as a subordinate. My political social philosophy if I had to define it would be the philosophy of me, myself, and my own.

“I’m tribal, apolitical, an egoist, and I don’t believe in traditional concepts in politics”.

Yeah, I guess it took you 11 days to come up with that as a response. “I don’t know, man”. Ok then.

Excuse me? I won’t respond right away because I am either working, sleeping, or doing things. That’s just the way it is. I can’t be online all the time.

Lol. Ok Peter.

WTF?

In reality “left” and “right” work together almost always, because they have to work for the real rulers. :wink:

Both are puppets. Aren’t they?

It’s always good to be both intelligent and diplomatic. Isn’t it?

It’s difficult to find the exact percentages.

Which one of the two vassals is it that you would or wouldn’t fight for? :stuck_out_tongue:

It is, but not always. Present case of the state of the world at hand.

There is no choice, both demand a production of simulation but of a different kind, it’sike apples and oranges, is it possible to produce a hybred between them?

Fight for one, and the other becomes as intractable. It’s like, policemen hate going to a domestic altercation , because they become the object of fury, by both parties.

The only possibility out of the impasse is a change.

Good.one. The best way to come.to grips with this is through social psychological approbation. Very simple transference of relatively unknown ideas, inter-project, introject, to form apparent stability. Between the psychology and the sociology creeps expediency of a nasty political kind, like a mirror, deflecting and revising facts, disfiguring into a successive calculus of grotesque images.

That is why, the masses go on board with anything that is made appealing by flowery rhetoric.

For that reason,.Arminius, Your question remains unanswered, since the fulcrum shifts away toward effects of social reality, fixed into and through its own language.