There is a disparity between white population sizes versus non-whites. However I disagree with many “conservative” premises. The white race is NOT in danger, despite nationalists fear-mongering and claiming it is. Why is the white race safe-guarded? Because non-whites perceive, correctly, that the white race is “privileged”. Non-whites fight viciously and desperately for access to white women, because they want move up the genetic hierarchy.
This means that there will always be a very high demand for white people, and white women. Purebreeds can only reproduce themselves. Therefore even if, hypothetically, the white population dropped, then the value and demand would increase exponentially. And that’s true, historically. White women are the most prized around the world, generally. Second place are east asians. Everybody knows this, but nobody really talks about it openly because it’s “racist and sexist”. But that’s the underlying truth.
Let’s consider, for a moment, if there were “no white people” on earth. What would happen? A new group would be designated as genetically superior. That means, a new section of humanity, and their females, would be dubbed and deemed superior for breeding with. That’s what “privilege” is. It’s marked by appearances. Beauty traits are spawned from what I describe. That any woman or group of humanity is “very beautiful”, is for these reasons and causes.
As long as white females prefer their own kind, white males, then there is no threat. And reality agrees. White women, in the end, return to their own flock, despite all their mistakes in life. It is the return to high culture and nobility that white men re-produce. A spiritual superiority that cannot be denied. The true power of european cultures, and its many offsprings. Ancient depths into the old, deep, forgotten wellsprings.
Other races do not inspire as much, nor do they have ‘universal’ values. East asians are introverted and exclusive, unwelcoming to outsiders, as are Jews in Israel who first require religious conversion and inter-marriage. Roman imperialism is the source of cosmopolitan ideology, that Southern Europeans are ‘tolerant’ of all outsiders and humanity. These are the true, real, and original “humanitarians”. Others are pretenders. Even North Europeans are disdainful to those they “tolerate”, holding double-standards. Universal Humanist ideology is a reflection of world-conquering behavior, an enslavement of all humanity beholden to a superior nation, of conquerors, owning their defeated nations and peoples.