White countries need White Shariah

Again, you insist that this is what masculinity is all about without exploring the extent to which you acquired this frame of mind as embodied in an “existential contraption”; or as a conclusion you reached only after examining gender roles rigorously from the perspective of a serious philosopher.

What were some of the experiences that you had with masculinity as a child? How were you indoctrinated by your family, your community etc., to construe a particular understanding of masculinity?

How were these interactions understood by you as embedded in a particular historical context [our own] and a particular culture context [your own].

Also, convince me that when you demand of others that they “back up” what they say, you are not insisting instead that eventually they must come over to your side and “back up” what Satyr says.

If only [here and now] sub-consciously.

Let’s start there.

:laughing:

Yeah, that’s part of my reaction to him. Especially when he comes in here huffing and puffing, strutting about in his black boots.

But there is also the part that, in all seriousness, I’d like to explore with him. Lots and lots of folks walk around arrogantly embracing one or another political agenda having never given much thought to the extent to which their values are rooted as much in the manner in which I construe the meaning of dasein as in a well thought out philosophical analysis.

I suspect that his reaction to me revolves in turn around an increasing concern [germinating “in his head” somewhere] that my points may well be reasonable. Or, perhaps, even applicable to him.

What then of his precious “self”? What if, like mine, it really is largely just an existential contraption?

White Sharia relationship advice: How to control your bitch and have a happy relationship

The most important part is to use male privilege. Never forget to use male privilege.

No need to make a trade, sweets. If you so desire, us WHITE SHARIA men can be both.

Interesting the level of social propaganda in today’s generation of self loathing women concerning the west. The ongoing collective absurdity of what has become the west is maddening. Nonetheless your prognosis of alterating the course of this collective absurdity is unrealistic which I stick by my assertion on that basis. Indeed it would only exasperate an already terrible situation much more. I do understand your anger and rage as I’ve mentioned already before however one has to wonder if there is any kind of alternative to rectify the ongoing problem that would be less destructive overall. Honestly I am at a loss with that as I simply don’t know and I have pondered on that for many years now. Time of course is against such a position which makes it all the more damning. Is there any way to change the female consciousness or psyche without the use of violence and coercion? I maintain that the only way for people to be liberated from controlled society or this twisted perverse civilization is for it to collapse completely, of course who knows how long that will take and if anybody at all in the world would survive such a transition. It’s a giant catch 22 clusterfuck. If civilization continues as is unaltered it will eventually destroy itself, the entire planet, and all of humanity as we know it however as liberating civilization collapsing would be for all people(for those surviving such a transition anyways) the outcome could possibly be the same where there is only a small margin of transitional success by comparison. Some like myself believe that small marginal percentage of success is well worth the risk, it depends on one’s perspective I suppose.

I leave this post with this firm belief of mine, this society or civilization cannot be reformed, it is beyond any kind of social and political reform. Usually a majority of the time when those try to forcibly reform society or civilization at its peak of decline and destructive moment of history such a plight becomes all the even more damaging. None of this of course is any constellation to you I’m betting but I leave you with it anyways. Feel free to respond with your thoughts.

Yeah, I don’t get it.
Europeans are racist and rapists.
Muslims are racist and rapists.
And who is she trading with, she a racists and rapists owner?

Why does everyone on these websites use college students to make their points? College kids are the most protected, liberal dumdums there are, they are clueless of the real world so why does every Tom, Dick, and Harry use them to represent the population at large? More worldly adults use more worldly adults to drive your points home.

Well said.

You can’t expect imbeciles or dumb animals to make any sense especially herd animals.

Why do all SJWs look alike? I think it’s mostly just a fashion statement.

Thank you!

It’s popular because if you focus on the ‘worldly’ people who inform those young women then you’ll get the usual anti-semite and homophobe replies.
As for this thread, the female college student is the important demographic when it comes to making a case for White Sharia.
Who else would better represent what happens when you liberate women from the traditional family patriarchy.

Okay. How’s about this…

SORRY NO TRITE GRAPHICS

Or this…

Many women want to have it all…an education, a career, a marriage, and children too. With scientific advances, women can cryopreserve their eggs and fertilized embryos for when the time is right which is called planned parenthood, the responsible way to have a family.

I strongly advocate for all career-minded young women to spend $20,000 of their earned, career wages to freeze their eggs so there is no rush to reproduce without the best, committed male mate, finances to raise a child in the middle to upper class, the acquired parental patience and awareness that comes with age to raise a better child, the time available to devote to family life, etc. Young, inexperienced, overwhelmed parents make poorer parents…literally in every way. True, they can crank out kid after kid, but without the resources and wherewithal to raise said kids, their rag-tag families become horrific, YouTube videos.

Educated causasian and asian folks aim to reproduce by choice rather than per chance or error. They have the right mentality but no those couples are not spitting out 5-10 kids each. Does the world need more of an overpopulation problem? No. Do we need more starving children? No. Do we need more kids who raise themselves? No.

White sharia is a dumb idea which promotes procreation for procreation’s sake in order to catch up with the number of offspring rather than finding ways to slow the reproduction rates of other races.

This world doesn’t need any more ill-gotten ill-kempt ill people in it.

There is no need for large families…kids don’t need to work when they get out of their diapers to provide incomes for the rest of their enormous families. Enormous families make me physically ill for they undermine the beauty of family. Parents should raise their children, not other siblings.

There is a disparity between white population sizes versus non-whites. However I disagree with many “conservative” premises. The white race is NOT in danger, despite nationalists fear-mongering and claiming it is. Why is the white race safe-guarded? Because non-whites perceive, correctly, that the white race is “privileged”. Non-whites fight viciously and desperately for access to white women, because they want move up the genetic hierarchy.

This means that there will always be a very high demand for white people, and white women. Purebreeds can only reproduce themselves. Therefore even if, hypothetically, the white population dropped, then the value and demand would increase exponentially. And that’s true, historically. White women are the most prized around the world, generally. Second place are east asians. Everybody knows this, but nobody really talks about it openly because it’s “racist and sexist”. But that’s the underlying truth.

Let’s consider, for a moment, if there were “no white people” on earth. What would happen? A new group would be designated as genetically superior. That means, a new section of humanity, and their females, would be dubbed and deemed superior for breeding with. That’s what “privilege” is. It’s marked by appearances. Beauty traits are spawned from what I describe. That any woman or group of humanity is “very beautiful”, is for these reasons and causes.

As long as white females prefer their own kind, white males, then there is no threat. And reality agrees. White women, in the end, return to their own flock, despite all their mistakes in life. It is the return to high culture and nobility that white men re-produce. A spiritual superiority that cannot be denied. The true power of european cultures, and its many offsprings. Ancient depths into the old, deep, forgotten wellsprings.

Other races do not inspire as much, nor do they have ‘universal’ values. East asians are introverted and exclusive, unwelcoming to outsiders, as are Jews in Israel who first require religious conversion and inter-marriage. Roman imperialism is the source of cosmopolitan ideology, that Southern Europeans are ‘tolerant’ of all outsiders and humanity. These are the true, real, and original “humanitarians”. Others are pretenders. Even North Europeans are disdainful to those they “tolerate”, holding double-standards. Universal Humanist ideology is a reflection of world-conquering behavior, an enslavement of all humanity beholden to a superior nation, of conquerors, owning their defeated nations and peoples.

There is no such thing as “not in danger”, only varying degrees of danger.

The number of whites is declining, while the number of some other races is increasing. Even when outnumbered and in this degenerate state, whites are still superior… to an extent.

There is a point when sheer quantity can overwhelm quality.

In any case, a group with below replacement birthrates doesn’t have a future (as long as the birthrates stay below replacement rates).

You obviously don’t pay attention to population demographics.

Christianity and Judaism is responsible for this ridiculous global civic nationalism that is plaguing the west.

“Therefore even if, hypothetically, the white population dropped, then the value and demand would increase exponentially.”

Isn’t it obvious that if the supply of a valued commodity goes down, then the demand will go up?

Are you a nationalist though?