surreptitious57 wrote:Anyone who registers here is automatically a member even if they have never posted or no longer use the site. Go and access the
most recent pages of new members and most of them will have zero posts ...
Most of all ILP members have
one post, as Alf has pointed out:
Alf wrote:Many ILP members post no or a few posts, and a few ILP members post many posts.
Look:

5009 ILP members (69.10%) have posted
no or less than 10 posts. Not more than 1435 ILP members (19,80%) have posted
10-99 posts. But merely 805 ILP members (11.10%) have posted
100 or more than 100 posts.
surreptitious57 wrote:and will never be seen again even though they are still
classed as members. But banning them would be a waste of time since you cannot ban someone from a site they are no longer on
This is such a trivial issue it cannot be taken seriously. Because how often a member posts or does not post is entirely up to them
There is some times a discrepancy in post counts because some
may be double posts or deletions so the figures will reflect this
The more posts I have, the more errors the counter machine makes.

Arminius wrote:According to my
counter machine I have posted 5077 posts, but according to my section "
user's posts" I have posted 5081 posts. So the counter machine has not always done its job perfectly. If it had done its job perfectly, it would have shown me the number "5081".
In reality I have posted even
more than 5081 posts, but those more posts have been deleted accidently by a moderator.
And now: According to my
counter machine I have posted 5078 posts, but according to my section "
user's posts" I have posted 5084 posts. So the counter machine has not always done its job perfectly. If it had done its job perfectly, it would have shown me the number "5084".
In reality I have posted even
more than 5084 posts, but those more posts have been deleted accidently by a moderator.
That is funny.
