If you study anything of sociological significance concerning society race has everything to do with social cohesion construct or not.
Outsider wrote:
You are a raving nut bag.
You love it, you suck on it.
Save it, sweetie, for someone who cares. It will not be me. I now know what your standards are, and now you know what mine are, and that’s all the difference—I hope—in the world.
If you use Negroes and 3rd World populations to achieve your ends then you will call it something like “reverse colonisation” to guilt unaware or mentally broken or mentally ill Europeans. A smart enemy.
They already have a lot of power, they already have access to all that technology, it’s about maintaining that power by destroying the competition. The enemy is not strong physically, he isn’t even that much more intelligent in the upper elements of IQ distribution, what he is is cunning and ugly beyond belief. You don’t expect this amount of ugliness and that’s why it’s difficult to understand the enemy for those who are so different from him.
I don’t even know why anybody would think I’m against these things. I’ve been speaking a lot lately about the need to punish dysfunctional behavior (which would be honor killings), the necessity of male dominance (female subordination), and of course women should live in fear, because fear is an emotion that evolved for a purpose, which is to protect us from danger. A healthy amount of fear is necessary. All societies are based on fear - fear from the threat of violence by daddy state’s physical enforcers - police and military, and fear from other groups which might seek to harm and conquer us. I see no reason why women should be exempt from this. The weak should fear the strong, and since women are weaker than men, they should fear men. It is the natural order of things. Not to mention that without fear there is no respect.
Yes, I’m all about receiving praise from brain-dead imbeciles on ILP. This is why I advocate White Sharia and other stuff which pretty much everybody here disagrees with. Because I want praise.
Because if somebody wants praise, the best way to obtain it is to advocate controversial stuff that only a small number of people agree with. Genius-level ILP reasoning on full display. Do tell us more.
Again, it’s not what you are “about” pertaining to anything deemed “controversial”. It’s the extent to which what you think you are about “in your head” reflects more a sound philosophical analysis or an existential contraption rooted in a uniquely individual trajectory of experiences that predisposed you to a particular set of political prejudices.
You’ll either explore that here with us [relating to gender or race] or you won’t.
Or is this all basically an exercise in irony: game playing and name calling.
Are you just the Devil’s advocate here? 
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t68hI1BKnUs[/youtube]
Haha. If you talk shit you have to be willing to back it up. This means risking injury, possibly even death.
It is what masculinity is about.
Yeah, like these sickly looking, puny commie faggots will stop us from implementing WHITE SHARIA.
Again, you insist that this is what masculinity is all about without exploring the extent to which you acquired this frame of mind as embodied in an “existential contraption”; or as a conclusion you reached only after examining gender roles rigorously from the perspective of a serious philosopher.
What were some of the experiences that you had with masculinity as a child? How were you indoctrinated by your family, your community etc., to construe a particular understanding of masculinity?
How were these interactions understood by you as embedded in a particular historical context [our own] and a particular culture context [your own].
Also, convince me that when you demand of others that they “back up” what they say, you are not insisting instead that eventually they must come over to your side and “back up” what Satyr says.
If only [here and now] sub-consciously.
Let’s start there.
Yeah, that’s part of my reaction to him. Especially when he comes in here huffing and puffing, strutting about in his black boots.
But there is also the part that, in all seriousness, I’d like to explore with him. Lots and lots of folks walk around arrogantly embracing one or another political agenda having never given much thought to the extent to which their values are rooted as much in the manner in which I construe the meaning of dasein as in a well thought out philosophical analysis.
I suspect that his reaction to me revolves in turn around an increasing concern [germinating “in his head” somewhere] that my points may well be reasonable. Or, perhaps, even applicable to him.
What then of his precious “self”? What if, like mine, it really is largely just an existential contraption?
White Sharia relationship advice: How to control your bitch and have a happy relationship
The most important part is to use male privilege. Never forget to use male privilege.
No need to make a trade, sweets. If you so desire, us WHITE SHARIA men can be both.
Interesting the level of social propaganda in today’s generation of self loathing women concerning the west. The ongoing collective absurdity of what has become the west is maddening. Nonetheless your prognosis of alterating the course of this collective absurdity is unrealistic which I stick by my assertion on that basis. Indeed it would only exasperate an already terrible situation much more. I do understand your anger and rage as I’ve mentioned already before however one has to wonder if there is any kind of alternative to rectify the ongoing problem that would be less destructive overall. Honestly I am at a loss with that as I simply don’t know and I have pondered on that for many years now. Time of course is against such a position which makes it all the more damning. Is there any way to change the female consciousness or psyche without the use of violence and coercion? I maintain that the only way for people to be liberated from controlled society or this twisted perverse civilization is for it to collapse completely, of course who knows how long that will take and if anybody at all in the world would survive such a transition. It’s a giant catch 22 clusterfuck. If civilization continues as is unaltered it will eventually destroy itself, the entire planet, and all of humanity as we know it however as liberating civilization collapsing would be for all people(for those surviving such a transition anyways) the outcome could possibly be the same where there is only a small margin of transitional success by comparison. Some like myself believe that small marginal percentage of success is well worth the risk, it depends on one’s perspective I suppose.
I leave this post with this firm belief of mine, this society or civilization cannot be reformed, it is beyond any kind of social and political reform. Usually a majority of the time when those try to forcibly reform society or civilization at its peak of decline and destructive moment of history such a plight becomes all the even more damaging. None of this of course is any constellation to you I’m betting but I leave you with it anyways. Feel free to respond with your thoughts.
Yeah, I don’t get it.
Europeans are racist and rapists.
Muslims are racist and rapists.
And who is she trading with, she a racists and rapists owner?
Why does everyone on these websites use college students to make their points? College kids are the most protected, liberal dumdums there are, they are clueless of the real world so why does every Tom, Dick, and Harry use them to represent the population at large? More worldly adults use more worldly adults to drive your points home.
Well said.
You can’t expect imbeciles or dumb animals to make any sense especially herd animals.
Why do all SJWs look alike? I think it’s mostly just a fashion statement.
Thank you!
It’s popular because if you focus on the ‘worldly’ people who inform those young women then you’ll get the usual anti-semite and homophobe replies.
As for this thread, the female college student is the important demographic when it comes to making a case for White Sharia.
Who else would better represent what happens when you liberate women from the traditional family patriarchy.