Gender Divide

So you are incapable of answering a yes or no question? I was being easy on you and your advanced aptitude.

How does it feel to be so embedded in such a delusion?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/02/russian-ex-scientists-apparent-murder-in-massachusetts-under-investigation.html
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-uc-davis-researcher-killed-ethiopia-20161006-snap-story.htmlhttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/coimbatore/asst-woman-professor-found-murdered-at-her-residence/articleshow/56383632.cms
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/crime/2017/03/23/daap-grad-former-art-academy-professor-killed-dc-corrina-mehiel-stabbing-cincinnati/99536230/
http://www.ancient.eu/Hypatia_of_Alexandria/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/30/2-shot-at-nyc-hospital-says-nypd.htmlhttp://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-doctor-teresa-sievers-slain-eleven-hundred-miles-to-murder/http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/toronto-doctor-found-dead-neurosurgeon-husband-charged-with-murder-1.3187968
http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/vincent-stanford-jailed-for-life-for-the-murder-of-stephanie-scott/news-story/0479316a4a423d315fb831c791ff2c50

Evidence of real intelligent women(scientists, professors, doctors, teachers) being murdered discrediting your delusion.

So your argument now is that intelligent women are victimized as much as or more than unintelligent women?

You’re done. Take some time to reflect on the error of your ways. Clearly, your reasoning is wrong.

I’m all done answering your dumb questions when you can’t answer a simple yes or no question with a yes or no.

Oh, I see the error of my ways…you made no real intelligent claim when you placed the word probably in there, probably being your wimpy escape clause.

Like I said, no she wouldn’t see it coming if it was not self-evident and the evidence supports my claim. Those women were murdered near or in their homes and none of them lived in a ghetto.

Yes, time out. You have thoroughly throttled me. You should ask one of the big boys for help making your arguments coherent.

Intelligent and proud women will always have the upper hand compared to stupider and more shameful women.

Your suggestion otherwise is wrong.

Should I congratulate your efforts to keep moving the goal post?

Your original claim…which has been proven wrong…many times over.

Your next claim…refuted with evidence as well for they are not bulletproof or stab proof either.

Your last claim…which is silly too due to dangerous men not always being self-evident, in fact, they can be a stranger hiding in your home waiting to ambush you, no matter your level of intelligence.

Intelligence guarantees nothing, it can be an aid given the best circumstances, circumstances that allow a person enough time to react, but bad shit can happen faster than an intelligent woman can compensate for.

Now I’m finished instructing you that the nature of reality can be at times out of the hands of even the most intelligent woman. To reiterate, intelligence guarantees nothing, not a safer husband, not a safer vehicle, not a safer neighborhood or job, or home, not a safer acquaintance or safer stranger.

Being a proud, attractive, intelligent woman is a recipe for disaster, like a billboard advertisement inviting unwanted male attention. It’s much safer to be a homely (not draw attention to yourself), schlepping(a pitiable charity case), dumb, quiet woman (completely mousy), unless you can back up your worth with a bit of ass-kicking.

Actually you’re moving the goalpost, because I said intelligent women change the context, you responded with “no woman is immune”, and that’s not a reasonable counter-point. Because a piano can fall out of a plane and kill anybody in the world. Absolute randomness is not a reasonable point. So you’re dodging the fact that intelligent women are far, far less victimized than average and stupid women. Because you deny this, I have reason to question your motives.

Who said anything about 100% guarantee? Not me, that’s you. That’s your reasoning, not mine.

An aspect of intelligence is deception, acting dumb and ditzy, when actually you’re a master intellect.

Some women, I can tell they’re hiding a very sharp intellect. But others, are not pretending to be stupid. Actions speak louder than words. I can tell intelligent women from unintelligent.

When you are hunted by a man, that is not a random piano. When you have no time to use your intelligence, your intelligence has not changed the context. You stated what appeared to me in your wording an absolute, that an intelligent woman absolutely changes the context and I pointed out that that is false—>

Intelligent women don’t always see it coming…duh!

I will concede that an intelligent woman given the time to act/react will fare better than other women.

Then you’re going backward on your earlier point that “it can happen anytime, anywhere”. You said it was random. Now you’re saying it’s not. So which is it, a matter of chance, or intelligence? If it’s the latter then clearly you agree with my points all along.

A very intelligent woman would “always see it coming” because she’s very intelligent. Sorry that you can’t relate with that fact. Don’t blame me for your own limitations.

Now, I will move this conversation forward. There are two sides to the equation. Smart women, and men, stupid women, and men. An intelligent predator, male, is very dangerous. Intelligent predators often feed on stupid females. Intelligent females are rarely targeted, because the chances of dropping on them, surprising them, is much lower. It’s like hunting and prey in the wild. Stupid and weaker victims tend to be victimized. So your approach to these matters is all wrong, and unrealistic.

WendyDarling, you’re WRONG.

Quote my saying that it was random, I didn’t say that, UR WRONG. Duh! I said that dangerous predators can ambush a smart woman at any place…anytime…duh!

Did you not peruse any of the articles I linked to or would learning a truth be too painful for such a mind as yours?

You said it never happens below

Pick one crazy notion and stay with it…maybe it will become less crazy the more you repeat yourself.

I refuse your whole line of reasoning and logic, because you are implying, at heart, that women are stupid, weak, defenseless, victims. I reject your whole system. I have faith in some women, unlike you. I believe that some women, perhaps a minority few, are intelligent, are “dangerous”, and can outsmart predatory men. I don’t care about your anecdotal evidence because rare exceptions, pianos falling out of planes killing people, don’t really make a point. You can link a few articles, say “here are example!” but they don’t help your point, which is, all women are victims. I don’t believe that, at all.

Your entire reasoning and argument is that women are weaklings, inferior. I say, “not all” in return. I say “some” women are intelligent, smart, can, and do defend themselves from all that you’re asserting.

Some men are predators? Obviously, you’re saying nothing new. Everybody knows this. I’ve explained a lot of it. Desperate males, or intelligent predators, are going to feed on women. Intelligent predators are 1 in 1000, probably. Desperate males are common though. Most women defend themselves well enough from desperate males.

However an intelligent male predator is rare, and if you are targeted, then there may not be a lot that women can do. An intelligent woman can defend herself from an intelligent predator. That’s about it. She has the highest chance of defense.

That’s why…some daughters and girls are blessed to have superior fathers, to pass on intelligence, physically and mentally. Those who are less endowed, stupider, will always continue to be victims. It’s an aspect of human evolution.

And there’s another point. Women can prey on weak men, psychologically, just as men can prey on weak women, physically.

I believe…could be proven wrong…unlike Wendy here, that some women are superior in regards to intelligence, poise, dignity, pride, than others. Some women are not victims, can defend themselves against the most dangerous types of men, and are educated with deep codes of honor. I could be wrong, but, I don’t believe I am. Many people, like Wendy, would have others believe that women are necessarily, always, victims. I refuse this. And it is a matter of intelligence, along with other factors. Dignity and pride are required. Shameful women are exceptions. Some women, with very low self esteem, mind less about being raped, prostituting their bodies, and some will even pride in “being a slut”, slut-walking.

Lumping all women into one group, as Wendy does, is dishonest and inaccurate. It’s wrong. After I add intelligence into the mix, it becomes clear how some women, superior, don’t share many of these sexual problems, like being assaulted, that Wendy implies.

To Wendy, you’re still wrong, start being right.

Self-defense is a moot point. By the time a woman is being assaulted physically, she’s already made countless mistakes. Physical assaults and rape of women, by strangers, is actually rare and becoming rarer. Most assaults and rapes, in modern times, occurs by men the woman already knows. This begs-the-question. How do women “know” their aggressors so well?

And I already explained this. Because many women are stupid, and, easily duped and led astray by dishonest or desperate men.

By the time a sexual assault becomes physical, the battle is pretty much lost. Males excel in physical violence. I’m repeating myself again. Males have evolved, thousands of years, of warfare, physical competitions, a vast majority of strenuous sports are acted by men, as well as soldiers in wars. So a woman really doesn’t stand a chance against 90% of men, physically. It’s not a contest.

That you imply that women “need to improve physically” demonstrates to me that you’ve lost the way. You’re not making sense. Intelligence is the better route, anyway. Women should be smarter about these types of things, but unfortunately, that may not be the case.

What kind of intelligence are you demonstrating, for example? Are you listening to what I’m saying? Are you getting my points? Maybe not. I shouldn’t have to repeat myself a dozen times.

It seems to me, overall, that you’re promoting victim-politics and supporting for women to be victims. I reject that. I am opposed to victim-ideology.

I believe that men, males, innately want freedom in life, far much more than women do. This reason and cause comes from thousands of years of men providing (civilization) for women, leading to complex and sophisticated forms of safety and security. Most of humanity don’t need to worry about such things like starvation and dying of thirst, for example. And despite Wendy’s claims, she’s wrong, most women don’t need to worry so much about sexual assaults. Maybe 49% of women have overall bad sexual experiences in life. Maybe 51% of women have overall good sexual experiences.

However, males need freedom, because society is anti-male. While life can be very, very competitive for any man or woman, in different regards, the competition among men, in masculine terms, is categorically different than women. Women’s competition is very superficial, although psychological and emotional. Women destroy each other’s minds, using passive-aggressive tactics, shaming tactics, and “psychological warfare”. Females can make others commit suicide, depression, or life a living hell, hence the term “happy wife happy life” stereotype.

Males want to be outside civilization, return to nature, the wild, however there is nothing left of the wild anymore. All places on earth are covered. Globalization is setting in.

When there are no places to escape to, masculinity becomes “toxic masculinity”, a popular phrase in modern times. It’s increasing in popularity. What does “toxic masculinity” mean, except, males have no places to escape to? Males have fewer and fewer places to be honest, to speak openly, or just “to be” in peace. Could it be, by the very nature of being born male, that boys and men are threats to society and civilization? And how much of a threat? This becomes obvious by criminality and warfare. Most criminals and soldiers are male. That explains a large percentage.

For a male who wants to “live in peace”, it is hard-won if at all. I believe that this is another reason the popular, mass religions, like Christianity, originally started up and became so popular. Because average men want to live in peace, but there is no peace to be found within civilization. Males must learn to suppress themselves, and Christianity developed this self-suppression, self-restraint, jailing oneself in cells, cubicles (offices), dorms (dormitories), etc.

Males literally jail themselves off from society, intentionally, to take a break from the constant, endless sexual competitions. In modern terms, this means “safe-spaces”, autistic bubble-realities, virtual realities, etc.

Women don’t need safe spaces, since, civilization was built for them. They won’t ever understand, nor do they want to, nor possibly, do they have the empathetic compulsion, the physical requirement, to understand. Women care about themselves, not others, until they have children, which technically are extensions of themselves anyway. A woman’s biological child is technically not “another”, something foreign and strange, but an extension of herself. Hence why a woman’s natural narcissism extends to protect her own children.

It’s instinct.

UR WRONG, it’s patently vital to a woman’s physical welfare and why must this always be about rape with you? There are many types of violent acts so expand your horizons past your rape fantasies.

I did not contend whether they were mostly acquaintances or strangers, that is the moot point.

I implied? UR WRONG, I made a statement of fact, women who can physically defend themselves stand a better chance at stopping an attempted rape, an aggravated assault and battery, death, etc.

Now who’s making all women victims (intelligent ones too), UR WRONG?

Denying women the benefits of being able to physically handle business is you supporting the victimization of all women.

I’m wasting my time trying to reason with your flavor of crazy.

Women can spend time on physical defense. That’s fine with me. But I believe, overall it’s a waste of time. And it’s anti-feminine. It’s a woman becoming more masculine, to do what? To suppress her fears of men? It’s just, completely the wrong direction.

What should a feminine, petite, beautiful woman do??? Should she bulk up on steroids like a behemoth? I say, no. She should focus her mind, first, if she is paralyzed from fear of men, which would be odd to begin with. It’s a bad premise.

Why is she so scared of men in the first place? Is she a bastard, her father abandoned her, she was raised by a single-mother?

THEREFORE…

She has no life experiences living among men. She is afraid of the unknown. She is unfamiliar with men.

I’m right! You’re wrong. lolz

Thanks for entertaining me with your preposterous extremism. Women don’t need to take steroids to do martial arts or boxing. If you cannot physically protect your mind, then you and your ginormous brain may die. Thanks again for the amusement.

This may be true in certain cases to a certain degree but it is not NECESSARILY about intelligence. The women who do defend their selves are usually better able to or at least try to or in the moment have the opportunity (see an opening) to rise above the fear and to do what has to be done…in order not to make herself a victim. It has a lot more to do with our survival instincts and in some cases how we value ourselves and a lot less to do with intelligence…unless you are speaking of street smarts here which do have to do with intelligence (as in gathering information and acting on it) to a certain degree.

Trust me. I know what I am talking about here.

You’re another woman-victim. My words are not for you and your ilk. If a woman were proud of herself, if she were raised by a strong father, then she would never give-in to victim complex and slave-mentality. She would refuse to be a victim. She would defend herself, and her honor. She would know men, through her father. However this is rare. And this is not you.

I know victim-mentality too well, now.

Most ‘modern’ women are victims, weaklings, stupid. Yes I am a misogynist in that I do not respect women who cling to victim-hood. But I am a woman-lover with those women in the world, rarer, who have self-worth, who have pride, who have something (Chastity) worth defending.

You are not like those women. You are not of the ilk. Most women do not have something worth defending, and hate themselves, appropriately. Most women are “victims”.

Fatherless. Without pride. Without self-love. Without self-confidence. Without self-worth.

Why are most (Modern) women victims? Why do they have low self-esteem, self-worth, self-identity? Because they are bastards. Because they are fatherless. This also demonstrates in females, in general, the ‘flocking’ mechanism to “bad-boys” or any male posing (faking) as an alpha-male. Fatherless women (Modern women) are stupid/ignorant/innocent insofar that they were not raised by a father-figure, not raised by a man, and so cannot tell the difference in males between the real and the fakery. This is a big cause, if not the main and predominant cause, for the flocking mechanism to the “bad boy”. Females flock to what they are lacking, a rebellious, contemptuous, strong-minded man.

The women that do have fathers, and are raised well, are more Noble and rare. These women have a strong sense of self, self-identity, self-worth, self-pride, self-love, self-confidence. These are the types of women who would fight tooth-and-nail if a rapist ever attacked them. They would fight back, ferociously. These are the most respectable types of women.

I’ve observed this a lot throughout life. Even other women, other females, flock to the “strong woman” rarity and oddity. I’ve seen women protect a girl’s virginity, because they want to preserve her innocence. Whereas with other girls, women will throw them under the bus, trick them into losing virginity, trick them into being a slut, etc. Women pick and choose from each-other too, who to defend, and who to outcast. These are ‘female’ politics, hidden from the view of the world, and especially from males. Women don’t talk about these things publicly. But my keen eye watches all things, all phenomenons.

Why are some females guarded (loved) and others, not? Why do some women have great worth and value, and others, not?

I would pose these types of questions to you all. But I already know that none of you have sufficient answers. So I will ask. And I will answer, myself.

These arguments should convince that some women are in fact, worth fighting for, worth guarding, worth aspiring toward. Some women are superior than others.

NO equality. NO equality between men and women. NO equality between women and women. NO equality between men and men. NO equality anywhere. That’s fine with me. But it’s not fine with you, the person reading this. Equality is a liberal, youthful idealism. And it is meaningless. It has no grounding in reality. MEANWHILE, you do the same as I say above. Even the person reading this, has preferences, of some men above other men, and of some women above other women.

Therefore, when some dumb bitch like Arcturus paints me as a “misogynist”, she will know, and others will know, fully why and how she is wrong. I am no more a “misogynist” than Arcturus is, or anybody else.

And rather these are accusations of personal flaws. So the better question to ask is, why does Arcturus hate women? Or worse, why does Arcturus hate herself???

Me, personally??? I’m not interested. I have bigger fish to fry. If others want to talk more about gender, then I recommend the “Gender Everything” thread.