I refuse your whole line of reasoning and logic, because you are implying, at heart, that women are stupid, weak, defenseless, victims. I reject your whole system. I have faith in some women, unlike you. I believe that some women, perhaps a minority few, are intelligent, are “dangerous”, and can outsmart predatory men. I don’t care about your anecdotal evidence because rare exceptions, pianos falling out of planes killing people, don’t really make a point. You can link a few articles, say “here are example!” but they don’t help your point, which is, all women are victims. I don’t believe that, at all.
Your entire reasoning and argument is that women are weaklings, inferior. I say, “not all” in return. I say “some” women are intelligent, smart, can, and do defend themselves from all that you’re asserting.
Some men are predators? Obviously, you’re saying nothing new. Everybody knows this. I’ve explained a lot of it. Desperate males, or intelligent predators, are going to feed on women. Intelligent predators are 1 in 1000, probably. Desperate males are common though. Most women defend themselves well enough from desperate males.
However an intelligent male predator is rare, and if you are targeted, then there may not be a lot that women can do. An intelligent woman can defend herself from an intelligent predator. That’s about it. She has the highest chance of defense.
That’s why…some daughters and girls are blessed to have superior fathers, to pass on intelligence, physically and mentally. Those who are less endowed, stupider, will always continue to be victims. It’s an aspect of human evolution.
And there’s another point. Women can prey on weak men, psychologically, just as men can prey on weak women, physically.