How is a woman supposed to differentiate one strange man from another without any interactions?
How will I know an average man when I see him? Hope for the best?
What they want as they prance around en masse is not what occurs when they walk alone. Women never walk alone in society without a fear of men. Place a strange man on the same sidewalk ahead of a woman alone after dark and she will go into a mini panic mode for most men are strangers so their is no guarantee to her safety, unless of course that she knows how to keep a level head and break some bones if need be.
The violent spouses/boyfriends, pedophile brothers, cousins, uncles, the normal looking stalking rapist…violent men do not stop but a small percentage of the atrocities that happen on a daily basis. Women must protect themselves, stop the men in their tracks by whatever force is necessary.
Sarcasm, as if these are fictitious occurrences. Men do not deserve any freedoms.
I have no reservations about putting down aggressors now. Anger replaced fear.
Tell me all about this wisdom in identifying dangerous strangers and defending against them.
Perhaps you’re lacking so allow me to shine some light. Shape, size, race of the man? Familiarity, clothes he’s wearing, the way he walks, where you and he are both walking, what time. Is he following you, or not? These are just some simple starts to identifying people. This ought to help you tremendously. However, we must admit, that many women are simply brain-dead stupid, very low intelligence, and honestly cannot identify people or recognize danger. Gullibility, innocence, naivety, easily duped, the “victims” of most crimes.
To seduce, trap, or ambush an intelligent woman would probably not work, because she would see it coming, and sense the danger, correctly. Properly and immediately identifying threats.
I apologize for revealing you in this manner, that you don’t have the first clue. This response can be a helpful lesson for you. Are you 12 or 13 years old?
You are like Ecmandu, except the female form, with vague generalizations and universalities. He claims that all women are evil, and you, all men are evil.
No, because most recognized and common species have evolved to the point of sexual reproduction. Usually it is the smaller or rarer organisms that reproduce asexually, basic cellular units, simple-cells, some amphibians like frogs, lizards, etc. Many plants and insects have genders. In many spider groups, females are larger than males.
I laid out the scenario. Did you read it? Do you understand that the man is before me on the same sidewalk at night? Duh. Can you comprehend that there are no definite telltale signs of psychopathy or sociopathy, it’s hidden. He is a well dressed, attractive, Asian male of average height and weight who is looking down as he approaches, but he is carrying a gun in the small of his back, he is an expert martial artists, and I am to be his next victim. Also, it wouldn’t matter if he was a white male wearing a priest’s attire…we already know how fucked up those muthers are.
Why would I wait for him to follow me? Some people are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ridiculous. If only you were a woman for a few years, you wouldn’t write such stupid things. Appearance is no guarantee of anything or can’t you comprehend that?
Can you not understand that not all threats are self-evident? If I’m thirteen, you are yet to be potty trained. Neener, neener, neener!
Presuming that a woman is beautiful, maybe wearing a skimpy outfit, walking alone out late, of course she is in danger of being taken into an alleyway, beaten, and raped. Males want sex, however, few are willing to go to such risky and immediate lengths to have it. Such occurrences are rare. You’re glossing over this fact, about rarity. Instead common males and females have common relationships, dating, seduction, temptations, etc. Men want to use women. Women want to use men. Sometimes mutually beneficial relationships are formed, a man offers what a woman needs, and a woman offers what a man needs. For men, it’s almost always about sex. For women, it’s about everything else. I demonstrated this already.
What you are taking about, however, with violent and dangerous males, is Desperation. Some males are desperate for sex, like Ecmandu, and it severely perverts and twists their drives and willpower. A sexually desperate male, has a high probability to rape and commit such crimes. Or usually it’s as simple as guy pouring roofies into a woman’s drink, or getting women drunk and passing out, etc. There are many factors and contexts to choose from.
It’s not a matter of “men are to blame” since males already receive the vast majority of punishments for sexual crimes. Females tend not to be punished for sexual crimes, since females are providers of sex to begin with. Most modern people see sex as pleasure, not reproduction. Reproduction is a foregone conclusion. Because average, common, and modern people don’t think that far ahead. Are blind to tomorrow. And an abortion would suffice.
My last post was a counter-point that you’re barely scratching the surface. I always go deep, wink wink.
Anyway, it strikes me now, that you as a female, don’t really understand male desperation. Thus it’s another point worth talking about. Females don’t understand, nor want to understand, male sexual desperation. That’s fine. A sexually desperate male is pathetic, to women, repulsive, disgusting, creepy, etc. I’ll add here that sexual desperation is also repulsive among males. Men do not respect beta-males who debase themselves, stalk women, and need to go to desperate lengths for the hope of sex. Throw all the negative identifiers into it. What triggers repulsive feelings is automatic and instinctive. Women can’t help it. Many women and girls try to “be nice” but that only encourages depraved/deprived males. So there is no “being nice” about it, in the end.
Many times I hear “alpha male status” as a social contrivance, a type of man who is not desperate for sex, since sex is readily available to him. And he subjugates and humiliates beta-males and other sexually depraved-deprived males. He’s a “bully” but with good cause.
Creeps (desperate males) are not good nor beneficial for any social grouping. It hurts the women of that group. It also causes disunity in the males. Therefore, sexual repulsion is universal, to both males and females. There’s something more to be said about guys who can “easily have” women versus those who cannot. The satiated versus the desperate.
That’s the distinction I’ll use.
Satiated males, versus, Desperate males. Desperation can take on many forms. It’s a different topic, worthy of a different topic, but it’s a good topic to derive from this thread. I’m happy that this thread finally produced something of worth.
I already answered that question, but I’ll answer it a second time since I’m feeling generous.
What is “self-evident” to one woman is not to another. It’s about intelligence. I already said that, of course, average and lower intelligent women are duped, leading to rape or worse, murder. An intelligent woman is better about screening, understanding male nature, recognizing and identifying threats, etc. This doesn’t seem obvious to you, but now’s always the best time to learn.
Do those “IQ tests” teach about identifying rapists? Seems like they’re not doing you any good.
Real intelligence is different. Real intelligent women don’t have the same problems as average and lower intelligent women have.
I’m all done answering your dumb questions when you can’t answer a simple yes or no question with a yes or no.
Oh, I see the error of my ways…you made no real intelligent claim when you placed the word probably in there, probably being your wimpy escape clause.
Like I said, no she wouldn’t see it coming if it was not self-evident and the evidence supports my claim. Those women were murdered near or in their homes and none of them lived in a ghetto.
Yes, time out. You have thoroughly throttled me. You should ask one of the big boys for help making your arguments coherent.
Should I congratulate your efforts to keep moving the goal post?
Your original claim…which has been proven wrong…many times over.
Your next claim…refuted with evidence as well for they are not bulletproof or stab proof either.
Your last claim…which is silly too due to dangerous men not always being self-evident, in fact, they can be a stranger hiding in your home waiting to ambush you, no matter your level of intelligence.
Intelligence guarantees nothing, it can be an aid given the best circumstances, circumstances that allow a person enough time to react, but bad shit can happen faster than an intelligent woman can compensate for.
Now I’m finished instructing you that the nature of reality can be at times out of the hands of even the most intelligent woman. To reiterate, intelligence guarantees nothing, not a safer husband, not a safer vehicle, not a safer neighborhood or job, or home, not a safer acquaintance or safer stranger.
Being a proud, attractive, intelligent woman is a recipe for disaster, like a billboard advertisement inviting unwanted male attention. It’s much safer to be a homely (not draw attention to yourself), schlepping(a pitiable charity case), dumb, quiet woman (completely mousy), unless you can back up your worth with a bit of ass-kicking.
Actually you’re moving the goalpost, because I said intelligent women change the context, you responded with “no woman is immune”, and that’s not a reasonable counter-point. Because a piano can fall out of a plane and kill anybody in the world. Absolute randomness is not a reasonable point. So you’re dodging the fact that intelligent women are far, far less victimized than average and stupid women. Because you deny this, I have reason to question your motives.
Who said anything about 100% guarantee? Not me, that’s you. That’s your reasoning, not mine.
An aspect of intelligence is deception, acting dumb and ditzy, when actually you’re a master intellect.
Some women, I can tell they’re hiding a very sharp intellect. But others, are not pretending to be stupid. Actions speak louder than words. I can tell intelligent women from unintelligent.
When you are hunted by a man, that is not a random piano. When you have no time to use your intelligence, your intelligence has not changed the context. You stated what appeared to me in your wording an absolute, that an intelligent woman absolutely changes the context and I pointed out that that is false—>
Intelligent women don’t always see it coming…duh!
I will concede that an intelligent woman given the time to act/react will fare better than other women.
Then you’re going backward on your earlier point that “it can happen anytime, anywhere”. You said it was random. Now you’re saying it’s not. So which is it, a matter of chance, or intelligence? If it’s the latter then clearly you agree with my points all along.
A very intelligent woman would “always see it coming” because she’s very intelligent. Sorry that you can’t relate with that fact. Don’t blame me for your own limitations.
Now, I will move this conversation forward. There are two sides to the equation. Smart women, and men, stupid women, and men. An intelligent predator, male, is very dangerous. Intelligent predators often feed on stupid females. Intelligent females are rarely targeted, because the chances of dropping on them, surprising them, is much lower. It’s like hunting and prey in the wild. Stupid and weaker victims tend to be victimized. So your approach to these matters is all wrong, and unrealistic.
