Criminals, rapists, murderers, men who are willing to break laws.
Average men, law-abiding, civil men, beta-males, cuckolds, white knights, “a good husband”, lots of men make women feel safe. It goes without saying that women are non-violent compared to men. That’s one of the gender divisions I already mentioned. You agree with me. However this point is about “psycho” versus “normal” men.
It cannot go both ways because non-violence results in the minority of men, who are violent, dominating everybody else. Criminals must be controlled by “violent good guys”. Although it’s an oxymoron. However women are protected from violent men, by other violent men.
A father perhaps. A brother. A cousin. A husband. These are some more examples.
Yes, of course, you poor babe.
Many times women want to be alone and “independent” and so want to walk throughout society “without fear”. Women often march to such a cause, having “rape walks” at universities, or “slut walks”, etc. It’s oxymoronic, because is it wrong to depend on a violent man to defend against other violent men? Is it wrong to depend on the police, or the military, ultimately? Women tend not to look that far ahead though. A large percentage of women are not victims, and not victimized, throughout their lives. Innocence remains.
Wisdom is a great defense. If a woman knows which men are aggressive and hateful, and will rape her, then she can react accordingly. Knowing the difference, is critical. Many women are stupid, easily duped, and taken advantage of. I would guess daughters of single-mothers or broken families. Daughters without strong fathers, teaching them how to identify and defend against hateful males, is critical in a woman’s self-esteem throughout life.
Maybe later