No. It’s immoral to be a nun. It’s only half correct.
It’s fine to take a break and see what it’s like… but very immoral to actually be a nun or monk … just for some vague sense that you are helping anyone. It’s extremely
Easy to point out the layers of hypocrisy here
Ha!! THE woman… spoken like someone who wants sexual and emotional property to be patented just for them. Women are materialistic by nature … what you just said is prostitution !!
Since we are making grandiose inaccurate claims, then I am too perfect to only score half of a trick question. I would not sleep with a psycho based on his crazy promise to not turn around and rape and torture anyway.
What? What is the materialism of a soul? You are not making one iota of sense.
Criminals, rapists, murderers, men who are willing to break laws.
Average men, law-abiding, civil men, beta-males, cuckolds, white knights, “a good husband”, lots of men make women feel safe. It goes without saying that women are non-violent compared to men. That’s one of the gender divisions I already mentioned. You agree with me. However this point is about “psycho” versus “normal” men.
It cannot go both ways because non-violence results in the minority of men, who are violent, dominating everybody else. Criminals must be controlled by “violent good guys”. Although it’s an oxymoron. However women are protected from violent men, by other violent men.
A father perhaps. A brother. A cousin. A husband. These are some more examples.
Yes, of course, you poor babe.
Many times women want to be alone and “independent” and so want to walk throughout society “without fear”. Women often march to such a cause, having “rape walks” at universities, or “slut walks”, etc. It’s oxymoronic, because is it wrong to depend on a violent man to defend against other violent men? Is it wrong to depend on the police, or the military, ultimately? Women tend not to look that far ahead though. A large percentage of women are not victims, and not victimized, throughout their lives. Innocence remains.
Wisdom is a great defense. If a woman knows which men are aggressive and hateful, and will rape her, then she can react accordingly. Knowing the difference, is critical. Many women are stupid, easily duped, and taken advantage of. I would guess daughters of single-mothers or broken families. Daughters without strong fathers, teaching them how to identify and defend against hateful males, is critical in a woman’s self-esteem throughout life.
Maybe later
How is a woman supposed to differentiate one strange man from another without any interactions?
How will I know an average man when I see him? Hope for the best?
What they want as they prance around en masse is not what occurs when they walk alone. Women never walk alone in society without a fear of men. Place a strange man on the same sidewalk ahead of a woman alone after dark and she will go into a mini panic mode for most men are strangers so their is no guarantee to her safety, unless of course that she knows how to keep a level head and break some bones if need be.
The violent spouses/boyfriends, pedophile brothers, cousins, uncles, the normal looking stalking rapist…violent men do not stop but a small percentage of the atrocities that happen on a daily basis. Women must protect themselves, stop the men in their tracks by whatever force is necessary.
Sarcasm, as if these are fictitious occurrences. Men do not deserve any freedoms.
I have no reservations about putting down aggressors now. Anger replaced fear.
Tell me all about this wisdom in identifying dangerous strangers and defending against them.
What if we talked for days about genders of plants, trees, ants, etc.
Wouldn’t that be silly?
Intelligence.
Perhaps you’re lacking so allow me to shine some light. Shape, size, race of the man? Familiarity, clothes he’s wearing, the way he walks, where you and he are both walking, what time. Is he following you, or not? These are just some simple starts to identifying people. This ought to help you tremendously. However, we must admit, that many women are simply brain-dead stupid, very low intelligence, and honestly cannot identify people or recognize danger. Gullibility, innocence, naivety, easily duped, the “victims” of most crimes.
To seduce, trap, or ambush an intelligent woman would probably not work, because she would see it coming, and sense the danger, correctly. Properly and immediately identifying threats.
I apologize for revealing you in this manner, that you don’t have the first clue. This response can be a helpful lesson for you. Are you 12 or 13 years old?
You are like Ecmandu, except the female form, with vague generalizations and universalities. He claims that all women are evil, and you, all men are evil.
Both of you…are wrong.
No, because most recognized and common species have evolved to the point of sexual reproduction. Usually it is the smaller or rarer organisms that reproduce asexually, basic cellular units, simple-cells, some amphibians like frogs, lizards, etc. Many plants and insects have genders. In many spider groups, females are larger than males.
It’s called “science”. Maybe it’s silly to you?
I laid out the scenario. Did you read it? Do you understand that the man is before me on the same sidewalk at night? Duh. Can you comprehend that there are no definite telltale signs of psychopathy or sociopathy, it’s hidden. He is a well dressed, attractive, Asian male of average height and weight who is looking down as he approaches, but he is carrying a gun in the small of his back, he is an expert martial artists, and I am to be his next victim. Also, it wouldn’t matter if he was a white male wearing a priest’s attire…we already know how fucked up those muthers are.
Why would I wait for him to follow me? Some people are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ridiculous. If only you were a woman for a few years, you wouldn’t write such stupid things. Appearance is no guarantee of anything or can’t you comprehend that?
Can you not understand that not all threats are self-evident? If I’m thirteen, you are yet to be potty trained. Neener, neener, neener! 
You’re not going deep enough.
Presuming that a woman is beautiful, maybe wearing a skimpy outfit, walking alone out late, of course she is in danger of being taken into an alleyway, beaten, and raped. Males want sex, however, few are willing to go to such risky and immediate lengths to have it. Such occurrences are rare. You’re glossing over this fact, about rarity. Instead common males and females have common relationships, dating, seduction, temptations, etc. Men want to use women. Women want to use men. Sometimes mutually beneficial relationships are formed, a man offers what a woman needs, and a woman offers what a man needs. For men, it’s almost always about sex. For women, it’s about everything else. I demonstrated this already.
What you are taking about, however, with violent and dangerous males, is Desperation. Some males are desperate for sex, like Ecmandu, and it severely perverts and twists their drives and willpower. A sexually desperate male, has a high probability to rape and commit such crimes. Or usually it’s as simple as guy pouring roofies into a woman’s drink, or getting women drunk and passing out, etc. There are many factors and contexts to choose from.
It’s not a matter of “men are to blame” since males already receive the vast majority of punishments for sexual crimes. Females tend not to be punished for sexual crimes, since females are providers of sex to begin with. Most modern people see sex as pleasure, not reproduction. Reproduction is a foregone conclusion. Because average, common, and modern people don’t think that far ahead. Are blind to tomorrow. And an abortion would suffice.
Can you go deeper, or not?
Give me an example of what you mean by deeper. Your last post wasn’t it, so don’t try to fool yourself that it was.
Where’s my answer?
My last post was a counter-point that you’re barely scratching the surface. I always go deep, wink wink.
Anyway, it strikes me now, that you as a female, don’t really understand male desperation. Thus it’s another point worth talking about. Females don’t understand, nor want to understand, male sexual desperation. That’s fine. A sexually desperate male is pathetic, to women, repulsive, disgusting, creepy, etc. I’ll add here that sexual desperation is also repulsive among males. Men do not respect beta-males who debase themselves, stalk women, and need to go to desperate lengths for the hope of sex. Throw all the negative identifiers into it. What triggers repulsive feelings is automatic and instinctive. Women can’t help it. Many women and girls try to “be nice” but that only encourages depraved/deprived males. So there is no “being nice” about it, in the end.
Many times I hear “alpha male status” as a social contrivance, a type of man who is not desperate for sex, since sex is readily available to him. And he subjugates and humiliates beta-males and other sexually depraved-deprived males. He’s a “bully” but with good cause.
Creeps (desperate males) are not good nor beneficial for any social grouping. It hurts the women of that group. It also causes disunity in the males. Therefore, sexual repulsion is universal, to both males and females. There’s something more to be said about guys who can “easily have” women versus those who cannot. The satiated versus the desperate.
That’s the distinction I’ll use.
Satiated males, versus, Desperate males. Desperation can take on many forms. It’s a different topic, worthy of a different topic, but it’s a good topic to derive from this thread. I’m happy that this thread finally produced something of worth.
Where’s my answer?
How is stating the obvious helpful? Beta-males, many are married and have access to sex. The problem is in the male mind, his psychology, overall.
Most men are broken and simply exhibit their defects in different ways, due to the lack of common sense found in a proper family upbringing.
Be more specific.
For the fifth time:
Can you understand that not all threats are self-evident?
I already answered that question, but I’ll answer it a second time since I’m feeling generous.
What is “self-evident” to one woman is not to another. It’s about intelligence. I already said that, of course, average and lower intelligent women are duped, leading to rape or worse, murder. An intelligent woman is better about screening, understanding male nature, recognizing and identifying threats, etc. This doesn’t seem obvious to you, but now’s always the best time to learn.
Do those “IQ tests” teach about identifying rapists? Seems like they’re not doing you any good.
Real intelligence is different. Real intelligent women don’t have the same problems as average and lower intelligent women have.
So you are incapable of answering a yes or no question? I was being easy on you and your advanced aptitude.
How does it feel to be so embedded in such a delusion?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/02/russian-ex-scientists-apparent-murder-in-massachusetts-under-investigation.html
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-uc-davis-researcher-killed-ethiopia-20161006-snap-story.htmlhttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/coimbatore/asst-woman-professor-found-murdered-at-her-residence/articleshow/56383632.cms
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/crime/2017/03/23/daap-grad-former-art-academy-professor-killed-dc-corrina-mehiel-stabbing-cincinnati/99536230/
http://www.ancient.eu/Hypatia_of_Alexandria/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/30/2-shot-at-nyc-hospital-says-nypd.htmlhttp://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-doctor-teresa-sievers-slain-eleven-hundred-miles-to-murder/http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/toronto-doctor-found-dead-neurosurgeon-husband-charged-with-murder-1.3187968
http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/vincent-stanford-jailed-for-life-for-the-murder-of-stephanie-scott/news-story/0479316a4a423d315fb831c791ff2c50
Evidence of real intelligent women(scientists, professors, doctors, teachers) being murdered discrediting your delusion.
So your argument now is that intelligent women are victimized as much as or more than unintelligent women?
You’re done. Take some time to reflect on the error of your ways. Clearly, your reasoning is wrong.
I’m all done answering your dumb questions when you can’t answer a simple yes or no question with a yes or no.
Oh, I see the error of my ways…you made no real intelligent claim when you placed the word probably in there, probably being your wimpy escape clause.
Like I said, no she wouldn’t see it coming if it was not self-evident and the evidence supports my claim. Those women were murdered near or in their homes and none of them lived in a ghetto.
Yes, time out. You have thoroughly throttled me. You should ask one of the big boys for help making your arguments coherent.
Intelligent and proud women will always have the upper hand compared to stupider and more shameful women.
Your suggestion otherwise is wrong.