Explain in detail how all women are whores…in detail with facts not your projections EC.
You have to trade for sex with women - sex itself isn’t considered good enough trade for a woman.
Even a homeless guy will fuck most any woman - the sex itself is the trade - he’s not even going to ask for a 5 cent empty can for it.
Men are also unblackmailable in small populations - meaning of you offered him a trillion dollars to fuck another guy, and he wasn’t gay, he’d shrug it off and say no. If you said you’ll chop his dick off if he doesn’t fuck a guy, he’ll shrug it off and say no, if you say you’re going to destroy the whole species, if he doesn’t fuck another guy, he’ll shrug it off and say no. You know why? Because men know the stakes for prostitution have infinite implications FAR more serious than stuff like that. Men can do long term planning, abstract cosmic laws better, can see implications of behavior trillions of years into the future … women aren’t wired that way shrug
Even if a woman takes a serious vow to be chaste, she’s making the claim that all sex is evil necessarily in all instances, forever, which is false - her hypocrisy will gain her material security - monks do the same thing - the topic of nuns and monks is very long actually sigh
Why isn’t it? An orgasm for an orgasm seems fair. If contraceptives are guaranteed, then women desire ecstasy too.
You’re stating the obvious, not the reality. Even women who can’t get pregnant because of infertility require trade greater than sex … men don’t. For men, sex is the trade.
Only heterosexual men are required to be moral agents
You ask me why? Women aren’t moral, and unlike urwrong stated, they don’t have to be.
Both genders are forced into morality. For women though, it tends to revolve around caring for their own children. For men, it’s everything else.
You are not explaining with any evidence these claims you make, about the soul of a woman being evil, about all women being amoral, about women being whore’s…you are not providing anything but your opinion.
This part is really, really, super-really important to explain, I can’t emphasize this enough!!
A woman in this world, if she opens up the whole can of worms that is morality, is like a father watching a small child walking to poke a paper clip in an electrical outlet - if he doesn’t get off his ass, both him and the child experience hell, the child for the first time, and his gets worse… it’s not a perfect analogy because the politics of women is much more complicated. But generally speaking, throwing a female into that ring is extremely severe abuse through passive neglect. Plus it makes men hypocrites. This stuff I’m explaining here is like preschool, it can’t really harm you much. Men know they can’t open that can of worms for women!! They know better. Men have to solve the problem before they teach the lesson. Women of earth are not placed in this type of sphere of consciousness. The irony is, the severe abuse women perpetrate on men causes a selective funnel that some men go through. the ones who are abusing women to get laid, haven’t gone through that funnel yet, the ones seeking revenge etc… the men who believe that they are good for a woman, so it’s ok if THEY trick women into sex, because it’s better than a real asshole getting sex… the means are the ends, guys still abusing the mating system are hopelessly stuck.
What forced morality? And what would be the alternative to this forced morality?
sigh
I’ll tell you something…
You ask ANY fucking nun on earth… will you fuck me for 50 trillion dollars and you can give it to your order, or any charity you want. Every fucking one of them would find a way to rationalize the sex.
Not all men are built this way.
Men do far more for children than women do, trying to collapse resource dependencies - and stop saying women are morally accountable fuck! They’re not morally accountable !!
If a woman keeps abandoning or murdering her own children then society will rebuke or punish her. She is obligated, morally, forced, to care for her children, to live at peace with society.
There is no “alternative” except, what, praising a woman who abandons and murders her own children? Is that what you’re implying, to take the “forced morality” away???
You’re all over the place.
So you have no evidence only your rationalization based on nothing concrete? Not good enough Ec.
Let’s bump up the stakes…
Let’s see how much you understand reality
The man offers 50 trillion dollars, if you don’t accept it, he will rape you, and torture every person on earth in a torture chamber for 50 years…
Do you consent to sex??
The thing is Wendy, women don’t understand reality.
Call me full of shit.
You are wrong on this though
Society has no guaranteed knowledge of this abandoning/murder of children, so it is not forced per se without societies knowledge, only when the woman admits to abandoning/murdering does such morality come into play after the fact. I don’t care to know how many women cause their own miscarriages, for that is a sad state of affairs and shaming a woman into being a poor mother is stupid. The more we delve into the whole double standards department, the more incoherent I will become because there is no end to it and that disturbs me on levels that I can’t even articulate…yet.
Why would I need money to have sex? Or better yet, why would I consent to sex with a psycho?
You answered the question half correct!
I’m impressed! 
It’s immoral to be a nun.
That’s the other half. It was a trick question.
However, attempting to tamper with sexual orientations for reasons of very deep implication is a greater crime than this world is worth.
Half correct? No totally correct.
A man who is beautiful inside and outside, always gets the woman. Now whether she herself is beautiful in both directions, would be based on his screening process, if he cared as much for what is inside. We all know men care for what is on the outside, but most don’t take much of an interest on what’s inside.
No. It’s immoral to be a nun. It’s only half correct.
It’s fine to take a break and see what it’s like… but very immoral to actually be a nun or monk … just for some vague sense that you are helping anyone. It’s extremely
Easy to point out the layers of hypocrisy here
Ha!! THE woman… spoken like someone who wants sexual and emotional property to be patented just for them. Women are materialistic by nature … what you just said is prostitution !!
Since we are making grandiose inaccurate claims, then I am too perfect to only score half of a trick question. I would not sleep with a psycho based on his crazy promise to not turn around and rape and torture anyway.
What? What is the materialism of a soul? You are not making one iota of sense.
Criminals, rapists, murderers, men who are willing to break laws.
Average men, law-abiding, civil men, beta-males, cuckolds, white knights, “a good husband”, lots of men make women feel safe. It goes without saying that women are non-violent compared to men. That’s one of the gender divisions I already mentioned. You agree with me. However this point is about “psycho” versus “normal” men.
It cannot go both ways because non-violence results in the minority of men, who are violent, dominating everybody else. Criminals must be controlled by “violent good guys”. Although it’s an oxymoron. However women are protected from violent men, by other violent men.
A father perhaps. A brother. A cousin. A husband. These are some more examples.
Yes, of course, you poor babe.
Many times women want to be alone and “independent” and so want to walk throughout society “without fear”. Women often march to such a cause, having “rape walks” at universities, or “slut walks”, etc. It’s oxymoronic, because is it wrong to depend on a violent man to defend against other violent men? Is it wrong to depend on the police, or the military, ultimately? Women tend not to look that far ahead though. A large percentage of women are not victims, and not victimized, throughout their lives. Innocence remains.
Wisdom is a great defense. If a woman knows which men are aggressive and hateful, and will rape her, then she can react accordingly. Knowing the difference, is critical. Many women are stupid, easily duped, and taken advantage of. I would guess daughters of single-mothers or broken families. Daughters without strong fathers, teaching them how to identify and defend against hateful males, is critical in a woman’s self-esteem throughout life.
Maybe later