Gender Divide

How different is a male and female cat or dog?
It’s not that different.

To be perfectly honest, I don’t know the approach escalation statistics for cats and dogs. I just don’t know it. I do know that for thousands upon thousands of years, billions of men have been saying, “why do assholes get the most women?” And not one women has ever thought, “wow, why do bitches get the most men?”

I’m going to suggest a no-brainer on this one.

I don’t think billions of men are stupid, I think they don’t analyze it further to include themselves because they want to be able to trick themselves to act out just enough to even secure a single sexual resource.

No, they don’t, you made that female blackmail system up just as you wrote that females have evil souls that men cannot sit with which is more made up, erroneous rubbish.

What are you talking about? Of course they have a blackmail system, read the last post…

Almost every man who has ever lived on earth has stated “why to assholes get the most women?” And there has definitely not been a woman who’s ever even thought, “wow, why do bitches get the most men?”

Billions of men and women … that’s not making shit up !!!

Because men COMPLAIN about this, they are held to a standard… not to be an asshole to get something from a woman that is good, otherwise they will hate themselves. Since nice women get laid MORE, they don’t have this complaint, and thus, are not liable for being or not being a bitch, they don’t suffer the hypocrisy clause, and have no motivational system to be anything. If they suffer, the heterosexual men pay for it, not the women, if women hurt heterosexual men, responding in any type of kind to a woman sends the heterosexual to hell. That’s the blackmail system!!! It’s there, billions of men and women say it every day!!!

Comes from both men and women [ though not all men or women ] but a woman has as much right to sleep
with as many people as she wants the same as a man does long as she accepts responsibility for her choices

The female blackmail system sends all heterosexual men to hell who allow a female to take responsibility.

Approach escalation is 100%.

You can’t handle the truth …

Actually sit and listen to billions of people, and then ponder the implications.

Billions of men say, “why do assholes get the most women?”

Billions of women have never once thought to even make such an absurd claim about bitches getting the most men.

You and WD are going to argue against billions of men and women??

It’s incorrect to say I don’t know what I’m talking about… if the facts are correct, the implication precisely follows with no possible option.

More accurately, all you can say is that I don’t know the facts…

Approach escalation being 100% (asshole)
Billions of men saying or thinking this
No women saying or thinking this about women.
Hell doesn’t exist

Etc… I’ll leave it to you to know these things imperically at a future time. We’ve reached an impasse. I will state however, that every evolutionary psychologist on earth agrees the evidence is overwhelming, and, they didn’t have my access!!

Don’t believe experts, and certainly don’t believe time traveling psychics who travel through time dilated portals. You’ll be judged by yourself, with all the facts at your disposal someday.

I can’t even tell you basics because this thread will be moved to rant!! I literally can’t tell you basic social science from studies anyone can read online without being banned. Think about the implications of that for a moment!! Like I said, the evolutionary psychologists all know this stuff!!


Ecmandu the only person who actually believes what you write is you

Right action.

Obviously writing, thinking and speech are actions.

I’ll tell you something… don’t worry about the studies and research. You’ll get my level of access someday, and then you’ll know even more than the studies. Until then, just ignore me. Seriously. It won’t change the outcome for you, but I cannot ask you to place faith in experts of the field or studies you haven’t conducted yourself.

You speak in absolute terms which is why I know what you say is not true. Though the real reason is that you apparently believe everything you say in
your You Tube videos and most of it is total rubbish. If you do believe it then you have seriously managed to deceive yourself given how ridiculous the
subject matter is. I would be interested to know how long you have been thinking like this and what exactly triggered these thoughts in the first place

Hmm… I read this message that was posted under the surreptitious57 handle.

It’s actually a form of dominance to tell people there are no absolutes, which triggers contradiction frequency, which causes females to like you.

You never saw my last video, because I never posted it here.

It’s basically saying that I outgrew my former videos and that there’s no point making additional ones.

I think it’s titled, “my last YouTube video” and wasn’t that great anyways…

You do realize that I’d have to teach you for thousands of years just to catch you up on basics.

Also, I haven’t perfected myself to my own satisfaction, which is honest, but NEVER an excuse!!

Most people say that as an excuse!!

I am glad that you stopped posting those videos since they had virtually nothing of any value in them
Hardly any one bothered watching them which defeats the reason for making them in the first place

Here’s my last one …

m.youtube.com/watch?v=mVfsOSiE4OM

ahh… yes, social conditioning tactics. how cute of you!

I want to make this point too…

Do you have even the slightest clue what it means for women to take responsibility for their actions??

It’s unconscionable !!!

You’d literally have to be pure evil to let that happen!!

It’s unspeakable!!

Thats not the answer!!

And I’ll explain something else, this planet and it’s treasures are rotten at the core …

When you get into the eternal damnation sequence because of women, the only possible light is a philosophic zombie universe. If there is a grand creator or goodness inherent, hat’s the only loophole for escaping the eternal damnation of all heterosexual men, the Easter egg of grace …

Everything else is hypocrisy for heterosexual men!

There is hope, the cosmos actually has room to save heterosexual men!! Once you start to realize that only hypocrisy gives you lots of women or any woman, and it’s hypocritical to punish them for it, you see hell in every direction as a heterosexual man…

Except!! Pz heaven universes… hypocrisy just vanishes

It’s not all doom and gloom …

That’s the hope that the cosmos holds for the hopeless.

Jesus was an angel encased in human flesh.

Some men make women feel unsafe. Some men make women feel safe. It can go either way. A beautiful and attractive woman will feel more unsafe in general, since she is more lusted after than average or uglier women. However all women, of any beauty, must defend against unwanted sexual advances. There is a noticeable and significant lack of education in the u.s. about sex and gender in this regard. In the 90s, the debate was between schools teaching sex, parents, or church. The issues are still unresolved, and so, leaves children to figure it out themselves, which leads to mistakes as well. No system is perfect. I lean toward parents educating their children, since children are property of parents, but then again, a lot of parents are simply bad parents, single parents, poor, or stupid. The church has potential, but tend to be weaklings, obsessive, and delusional. So religion has flaws. And state schools are neglectful, and don’t want to broach sex since it’s too politically correct. Thus public schools tend to favor liberal approaches and teaching “all colors of the rainbow”, which is also wrong.

Sexual education is very important, because a boy ought to know the consequences of his hormones, and a girl ought to know how to screen males and mates better. Uneducated boys can harm girls, become violent, and mishandle their self-control (suppression). Uneducated girls tend to lose virginity sooner than others, make mistakes, can become depressive, jaded, and/or suicidal. Then there is peer pressure, boys among boys, bragging about getting laid often, or girls among girls, shaming each other for slutting around.

Ecmandu has a point, thus far. A predominant amount of “slut-shaming” occurs among girls. Girls are competing among each other too. Girls learn to control the sexual game from an early age, and use hedonism to your own advantage. It’s easy within civilized and suppressed environments, to manipulate males, using sex. But that makes the average female lazy, intellectually. Her intellect then focuses on social affairs to compensate, lacking a proper male idol.

The division between gender is huge. Females are the pregnant ones, and usually the caretakers of children. That is very different.

To claim that “gender is not that different” reminds me of children, before puberty, ages 5-12. Prepubescent children are more “equal” you could say. Boys and girls can be around the same size, competitive, and as violent across gender. But then puberty and adolescence change everything. The hormones demonstrate the differences of gender and body, males develop different bodies and muscle-mass than females. Women grow tits and the hourglass figure, shape.

However, even from a young age, the general social rule “do not hit women” is put into effect and enforced on the playground. Girls are not supposed to be hit, punched, and kicked, brutally, as boys do to boys. Then comes the phrase “boys will be boys” after the fact. After the rule is put into effect. Girls are protected from violence. I’m not saying it’s good or bad. I’m saying that what society -is-. And thousands of years of history and evolution are put into this ruling.

Perhaps, a society or group could teach girls to be “just as violent” as boys, or boys to be just as “psychologically manipulative” as girls. But why? To what end? To prove a point? To prove liberal-left ideology true, in spite of the obvious, and in spite of history? And then how would such a society sustain itself? But this is hearsay. It’s a moot point, useless.

Instead, tradition dictates the norm. Feminine females will win out in the end. Masculine males will win out in the end. And the further people stray from the norm, the more backlash there will be, and more correction will be required, to come back to the “true path”.

Feminine women have a very powerful allure and self-respect. A high self-esteem. They’ve not fucked around, like average women, not been so easily seduced, pulled into lies and seduction by creeps and cretins. Very selective. High selection and choosiness denotes higher intelligence and sophistication. A female who lets few, or one, in, is much more highly respected by everybody.

I think it was pointed out by one of the women here that guys like to get laid to prove how canniving they are. This is a female way to look at it. You can’t trick a man into having sex with a woman. Everyone knows that having sex with women is to trick them.

I will tell you straight up, there is no guy who really thinks women or men are sluts for having sex with lots of people. This is 100% female. The only reason men will say this, is to get sex from women, not because they believe it. The dickheads, the men who only think with their dicks, force themselves to go to church, watch sports, defend female psychological hypocrisy… even Urwrong is doing it, by stating that women who choose one man is more respectable, more intelligent… he’s contradicting himself to puff himself up in the wild to show he can survive while destroying wealth (logical consistency in this case), which is the only thing that sexually compells a female towards a male. He criticizes slut shaming, and then unequivocally does it. Men are programmed by female sexuality to contradict themselves to get the social standing necessary to secure a sexual resource. Self contradiction in the human species IS EXACTLY like a bird singing a song, or a male peacock spreading its feathers… females will NEVER fuck a male peacock who NEVER spreads those feathers, EVER!

This is important! The lower the contradiction frequency of a male, the desire to not destroy wealth, live off false flags and planned obselesence and just polluting etc… human females see NO spreading of the feathers!! They are EXACTLY like a peacock to this degree. Females are extremely simple sexually in the human species. A male HAS to destroy wealth AND show that he can survive it, survive contradicting himself and the whole species. If he doesn’t get hurt by it, he’s seen as fit to a human female. That’s it. That’s exactly how female sexual consent works. It’s a basic broken computer program, there are no exceptions in this species, just like a female peacock has never mated with a male who never spread their feathers etc… or other male “song” - type species.

On the contrary my logic is solid as my vision has depth. It’s as simple as a child. Imagine the perspective of a child, whose mother is a whore, versus the child whose mother is a saint? Which child has it better or worse? That the other children, and adults of the tribe, know the child of the whore. Other children will make fun of and bully the whore-child. The whore-child will probably be single-parented, father absent, which marks shame. The saint-child will have an easier life by comparison, call it “privilege” if you must. The saint-child probably has a married mother and more cohesive, loyal family.

It’s simply more difficult to convey a sense of respect and security for a promiscuous woman. Again I’m not saying it’s “bad or good”, as Ecmandu implies. I’m saying this is a matter of -is-. I could be wrong, prove me wrong. But chances are, YOU’RE wrong.

Convince me that a whore-child is more respected, will have “equal” privileges in life, will not be shamed by the community, will not be made fun or bullied in school. Give me real life examples and scenarios. Show me.