Many of those arguments I never made and so I will not address those which have no bearing on what I am saying.
Can you show me where I advocated the term white patriarchy? One could just as well have said Europe needs traditional European values:
Would you then say that the idea of European tradition is dead, particularly for those who matter in the struggles we face today?
I am saying there is a reason to be serious and literal:
Considering the issues facing Europe today, do you not think that many Europeans will come seeking their own and be nothing but repelled by the propagation of muslim ideas, in jest or otherwise?
I see no reason to address simple minds who cannot think beyond the repetition of internet memes. That is the difference between aristocracy and any form of government which relies on mass society.
If you mean repel, then this is exactly what I mean by the difference between aristocracy and governments based on mass society. It might not repel the mass of uncouth men and women but it will repel those who care for and respect their traditions and do not see them as dead so that the banner of islam must be taken up instead.
Are you making the argument here that what is best is based on popularity? I think you are underestimating the ability of great men to rise above the heard and the mass of statistic.
Who said anything about being moderate? Caring for European tradition in Europe is moderate to you?
Though I did not make this argument, I will say that the argument I am making is not about “triggering” at all but the development and progression of our ideals.
Would you be willing to show the source which proves that sharia is originally a European term? Also, accusations of being triggered is not an argument for anyone except children and mental teenagers populating the internet.
None of your arguments even addressed the fact that you have sought out islam for your campaign rather than European ideals, and your response was full of arguments not even addressed to me.